Radiofrequency Ablation Using Cooled-Wet Electrode

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02675894
Collaborator
RF medical (Other), Medical Research Collaborating Center (Other)
77
1
2
48.3
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To determine safety, ablative zone, technical success rate and early safety data of recently introduced cool-wet electrode in eligible patients who are indicative for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver tumors.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: cooled-wet electrode
  • Device: separable clustered electrode
N/A

Detailed Description

To determine safety, ablative zone, technical success rate and early safety data (12 months local tumor progression rate) of recently introduced cooled-wet electrode in eligible patients who are indicative for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver tumors in comparison with currently used separable clustered electrode in our institution. Owing to tissue cooling effect of internally cooled-wet electrode can be used in switching bipolar mode. Patients would be randomized into two groups (cool-wet electrode group and separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode). The results from this preliminary study would be used for main study to compare the efficacy and safety data between two electrodes in the future.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
77 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Switching Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using Cooled-Wet Electrode for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 14, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 19, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 24, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: RFA with cooled-wet electrode

RFA is performed using three cool-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode under the fused US guidance.

Device: cooled-wet electrode
RFA is performed using three cooled-wet electrodes in switching bipolar mode. The electrode is anticipated to reduce tissue resistance by releasing small amount of saline during the procedure, which may lead larger ablative volume by delivering more RF energy.

Active Comparator: RFA with separable clustered electrode

RFA using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode under the fused US guidance

Device: separable clustered electrode
RFA is performed using separable clustered electrode in switching monopolar mode.
Other Names:
  • Octopus(R)
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. LTP [24 months]

      cumulating local tumor progression rate over 2- year after RFA

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Technical success rate [1 months]

      technical success rate on 1 month follow-up which indicates no residual tumor on cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI)

    2. IDR rate [24 months]

      cumulating intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) rate over 2- year after RFA

    3. EM rate [24 months]

      cumulating extrahepatic metastasis (EM) rate over 2- year after RFA

    4. Maximal diameter of ablative zone [7 day]

      Maximal diameter of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm.

    5. ablation time [1 day]

      RFA procedure time in each patient.

    6. Complication [12 months]

      all complication rate and grades (according to Clavien system from I to III) related with RFA procedure

    7. Volume of ablative zone [7 days]

      Volume of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm3.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. US/CT or MR fusion success rate [1 day]

      RFA is performed under real time US guidance and US is fused with pre-RFA CT or MRI before ablation of the index tumor. US/CT or US/MR fusion quality is assessed by an operator.

    2. Immediate assess of technique success rate [2 days]

      After performing RFA, patients were transferred CT unit to confirm immediate technique success. It is performed in both a) visual inspection using pre-and post-RFA images side-by-side comparison and b) software assisted inspection which register pre-and post-RFA scans. The results would be used to perform additional treatment (2nd look RFA).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    20 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No

    Inclusion Criteria: all conditions have to be fulfilled.

    • Diagnosed with HCC (1~5cm) according to AASLD guideline or LI-RADS on MDCT or liver MRI within 60 days before RFA

    • liver metastasis histologically confirmed or characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging

    • signed informed consent

    • treatment naive index tumor (no history of local treatment for an index tumor)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • more than three tumors in a patients

    • tumor size larger than 5cm

    • tumor attaches to central portal vein or hepatic vein

    • Child-Pugh classification C

    • uncorrected coagulopathy

    • presence of extrahepatic metastases

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Seoul National University Hospital
    • RF medical
    • Medical Research Collaborating Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jeong Min Lee, MD, Seoul National University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Jeong Min Lee, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02675894
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • SNUH-2013-2283
    First Posted:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Jeong Min Lee, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 18, 2021