Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Dual Switching System and a Separable Clustered Electrode (Octopus®)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Increasing ablative zone is an essential part to improve technical success and long term outcome in patient treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
A combination of dual switching system and separable clustered electrode has been reported to create large ablative zone in preclinical study.
Based on preclinical study, the investigators conducted a preliminary study in eligible 60 patients to measure whether this combination (dual switching system and separable clustered electrode) improves technical success rate and local tumor progression rate over a year, in comparison with historical control group.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Increasing ablative zone is an essential part to improve technical success and long term outcome in patient treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
A combination of dual switching system and separable clustered electrode has been reported to create large ablative zone in preclinical study.
Based on preclinical study, the investigators conducted a preliminary study in eligible 60 patients to measure whether this combination (dual switching system and separable clustered electrode) improves technical success rate and local tumor progression rate over a year, in comparison with historical control group using propensity score matching.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: RFA DSM Eligible patients who undergo RFA using DSM and separable clustered electrodes. |
Device: DSM
Monopolar RFA using dual switching mode (DSM)
Device: separable clustered electrode
A separable clustered electrode is similar to a clustered electrode, although it differs from a conventional clustered electrode in that each individual electrode is separable.
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: RFA SSM Historical control group consisted of patients underwent RFA in our institution with single switching mode (SSM) and single/ or multiple clustered electrodes. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- local tumor progression (LTP) [12 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Technical success on 1 months follow-up imaging after RFA (no residual/progressed tumor) [1 months]
- rate of intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) after RFA [12 months]
- rate of extrahepatic metastasis (EM) after RFA [12 months]
Other Outcome Measures
- Number of complication of RFA [6 months]
incidence of any possible complication related with RFA
- Maximal diameter of ablative zone [7 day]
Maximal diameter of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm.
- ablation time [1 day]
ablation time in a patient
- Real time US fusion image feasibility [1 day after RFA procedure]
success or failure of accurate fusion between US and pre-RFA cross sectional images
- Immediate evaluation of ablative zone via visual assess and pre-and post-RFA images registration. [12 months]
Prediction of LTP by classifying patients according to assessing ablative margin in each method on a four point scale (1: residual tumor, 4: ablative margin equal to or larger than 5mm)
- Volume of ablative zone [7 days]
Volume of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm3.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma (according to AASLD guideline or LI-RADS)
-
histologically confirmed HCC
-
histologically confirmed or typical imaging feature of colorectal cancer liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer AND
-
equal to or larger than 2cm, equal to or smaller than 5cm
-
available cross-sectional liver imaging within 30 days before RFA
-
signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
history of local treatment on the index tumor
-
more than three tumors in a patient
-
tumors in central portion of portal vein or hepatic vein
-
Child-Pugh class C
-
vascular invasion by tumors
-
uncorrected coagulopathy
-
presence of multiple extrahepatic metastases
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | Korea, Republic of |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeong Min Lee, MD, Seoul National University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- SNUH-2013-1441