Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Dual Switching System and a Separable Clustered Electrode (Octopus®)

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02675881
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
23.2
2.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Increasing ablative zone is an essential part to improve technical success and long term outcome in patient treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

A combination of dual switching system and separable clustered electrode has been reported to create large ablative zone in preclinical study.

Based on preclinical study, the investigators conducted a preliminary study in eligible 60 patients to measure whether this combination (dual switching system and separable clustered electrode) improves technical success rate and local tumor progression rate over a year, in comparison with historical control group.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: DSM
  • Device: separable clustered electrode
N/A

Detailed Description

Increasing ablative zone is an essential part to improve technical success and long term outcome in patient treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

A combination of dual switching system and separable clustered electrode has been reported to create large ablative zone in preclinical study.

Based on preclinical study, the investigators conducted a preliminary study in eligible 60 patients to measure whether this combination (dual switching system and separable clustered electrode) improves technical success rate and local tumor progression rate over a year, in comparison with historical control group using propensity score matching.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Dual Switching System and a Separable Clustered Electrode (Octopus®) for Treatment of Focal Liver Malignancies: A Preliminary Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 5, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 8, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 13, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: RFA DSM

Eligible patients who undergo RFA using DSM and separable clustered electrodes.

Device: DSM
Monopolar RFA using dual switching mode (DSM)

Device: separable clustered electrode
A separable clustered electrode is similar to a clustered electrode, although it differs from a conventional clustered electrode in that each individual electrode is separable.
Other Names:
  • Octopus(R)
  • No Intervention: RFA SSM

    Historical control group consisted of patients underwent RFA in our institution with single switching mode (SSM) and single/ or multiple clustered electrodes.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. local tumor progression (LTP) [12 months]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Technical success on 1 months follow-up imaging after RFA (no residual/progressed tumor) [1 months]

    2. rate of intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) after RFA [12 months]

    3. rate of extrahepatic metastasis (EM) after RFA [12 months]

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Number of complication of RFA [6 months]

      incidence of any possible complication related with RFA

    2. Maximal diameter of ablative zone [7 day]

      Maximal diameter of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm.

    3. ablation time [1 day]

      ablation time in a patient

    4. Real time US fusion image feasibility [1 day after RFA procedure]

      success or failure of accurate fusion between US and pre-RFA cross sectional images

    5. Immediate evaluation of ablative zone via visual assess and pre-and post-RFA images registration. [12 months]

      Prediction of LTP by classifying patients according to assessing ablative margin in each method on a four point scale (1: residual tumor, 4: ablative margin equal to or larger than 5mm)

    6. Volume of ablative zone [7 days]

      Volume of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm3.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    20 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Hepatocellular carcinoma (according to AASLD guideline or LI-RADS)

    • histologically confirmed HCC

    • histologically confirmed or typical imaging feature of colorectal cancer liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer AND

    • equal to or larger than 2cm, equal to or smaller than 5cm

    • available cross-sectional liver imaging within 30 days before RFA

    • signed informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • history of local treatment on the index tumor

    • more than three tumors in a patient

    • tumors in central portion of portal vein or hepatic vein

    • Child-Pugh class C

    • vascular invasion by tumors

    • uncorrected coagulopathy

    • presence of multiple extrahepatic metastases

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Seoul National University Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jeong Min Lee, MD, Seoul National University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Jeong Min Lee, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02675881
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • SNUH-2013-1441
    First Posted:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Jeong Min Lee, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 18, 2021