Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Ototoxicity Screening (SOS)

Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05789316
Collaborator
(none)
70
1
1
18.1
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an ototoxicity screening protocol among head and neck (H&N) cancer patients followed in survivorship clinic that received cisplatin-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Ototoxicity Screening Protocol
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
70 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Ototoxicity Screening (SOS) Protocol
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 30, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Ototoxicity Screening Protocol

After enrollment, participants will complete a pre-screening survey. Before their survivorship clinic visit, participants will complete the ototoxicity screening protocol and implementation outcome surveys. During their visit, they will receive counseling on ototoxicity and referral to audiology. After their visit, they will complete the SESMQ and WU-QOLv4 surveys and undergo pure tone audiometry (0.25 - 8 kHz). Each participants will complete this protocol once. The investigators will follow each participant by chart review for at least six months to evaluate for audiologic follow-up.

Other: Ototoxicity Screening Protocol
The ototoxicity screening protocol contains a functional and objective component. The functional component is the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Screening Version (HHIE-S). The objective component will be pure tone audiometry. A 2 kHz tone at 40 dB will play through over-the-ear headphones and subjects will indicate whether they heard it.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of participants who complete audiologic follow-up [Through completion of follow-up (estimated to be 6 months)]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Feasibility of ototoxicity screening protocol as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure [Before survivorship clinic visit (Day 1)]

    -Contains 4 statements about the proposed intervention that are scored on a five-point Likert scale (1 indicates the participant "completely disagrees", 5 indicates "completely agrees"). A score greater than or equal to 4 will indicate the intervention is feasible.

  2. Acceptability of ototoxicity screening protocol as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure [Before survivorship clinic visit (Day 1)]

    -Contains 4 statements about the proposed intervention that are scored on a five-point Likert scale (1 indicates the participant "completely disagrees", 5 indicates "completely agrees"). A score greater than or equal to 4 will indicate the intervention is acceptable.

  3. Appropriateness of ototoxicity screening protocol as measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure [Before survivorship clinic visit (Day 1)]

    -Contains 4 statements about the proposed intervention that are scored on a five-point Likert scale (1 indicates the participant "completely disagrees", 5 indicates "completely agrees"). A score greater than or equal to 4 will indicate the intervention is appropriate.

  4. Functional hearing loss of participants as measured by the Situational Management Questionnaire (SESMQ) [After survivorship clinic visit (Day 1)]

    -This questionnaire contains 20 situations. Participants rate each situation according to their ability to hear in the given situation (hearing ability scale; SESMQH) and their confidence in managing the given situation (confidence scale; SESMQC). The score for each situation ranges from 0 (poor hearing/low confidence) to 10 (normal hearing/high confidence), totaling 200 points for each scale. The higher the score indicates less hearing loss to the participant.

  5. Quality of life of participants as measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) [After survivorship clinic visit (Day 1)]

    -This questionnaire contains 16 items on morbidities associated with H&N cancer treatment. Twelve items are graded on a 5-point Likert scale. One question lists treatment-related morbidities and ask participants to identify their top three most important issues. The last three questions evaluate global QoL. It is scored on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). However, UW-QOL does not include symptoms of ototoxicity. Therefore, the investigators will modify it to include tinnitus and hearing loss as additional 5-point Likert scale questions and morbidities in the rank order question.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult (≥ 18 years old)

  • H&N cancer patients will be eligible for inclusion if they have previously undergone cisplatin-based CRT with curative intent (i.e., definitive, neoadjuvant, or adjuvant).

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient has been evaluated by an audiologist within the past 12 months

  • Use of a hearing aid

  • Received a cochlear implant

  • Cannot complete simple forms in English

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Lee, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Washington University School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05789316
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 202302038
First Posted:
Mar 29, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Mar 29, 2023
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Washington University School of Medicine
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 29, 2023