AUTOMASSEEG: Selective Effect of Foam Rolling and Manual Massage

Sponsor
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04859140
Collaborator
(none)
65
1
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The present double-blinded randomized controlled design aims at comparing the effects of a full-body manual massage and foam rolling intervention. Sixty-five healthy individuals were randomly allocated to foam rolling, manual massage or a control intervention consisting in an autogenic relaxation routine.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Psychometric ratings (Likert-scale)
  • Behavioral: Range of motion measures
  • Behavioral: Mental calculation task
  • Device: Resting-state electroencephalography
  • Device: Resting-state galvanic skin resistance measures
N/A

Detailed Description

Self-report ratings of perceived anxiety, muscle pain and relaxation were the psychometric outcome variables. Sit-and-reach, toes-touch and mental calculation performances were the behavioral variables. Resting-state alpha and beta power recorded using electroencephalography and galvanic skin resistance measures were the neurophysiological outcome variables.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
65 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Three independent groups, two measurement pointsThree independent groups, two measurement points
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Allocation concealment
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Effects of Self-myofascial Release and Manual Massage on Psychometric, Behavioural and Neurophysiological Indexes of Performance and Well-being: a Randomized Control Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Foam rolling

The foam rolling routine consisted in unilateral exercises alternatively performed on both legs and bilateral exercises on lower and back muscles. All participants started with the feet in a standing up position with a lacrosse ball. Then, participants performed on the ground the foam rolling exercises with the foam roller targeting leg and back muscles.

Other: Psychometric ratings (Likert-scale)
Self-report of perceived anxiety and physical sensations (muscle pain, relaxation and warmth)

Behavioral: Range of motion measures
Sit-and-reach and toe touch tests

Behavioral: Mental calculation task
Iterated substractions (for 2 minutes)

Device: Resting-state electroencephalography
Alpha and beta oscillation power (4 minutes recordings)

Device: Resting-state galvanic skin resistance measures
Skin conductance during the resting state period

Experimental: Manual massage

Participants in the manual massage group received manual massage by a professional physiotherapist who was blinded to the purpose of the experiment (20 years of registered practice). Participants were lying in the prone position on a massage table. To facilitate the physiotherapist's maneuvers, massage oil was used. The manual massage protocol reproduced several features of the foam rolling intervention, i.e., order of the areas massaged, massage time per muscles and total duration of the session.

Other: Psychometric ratings (Likert-scale)
Self-report of perceived anxiety and physical sensations (muscle pain, relaxation and warmth)

Behavioral: Range of motion measures
Sit-and-reach and toe touch tests

Behavioral: Mental calculation task
Iterated substractions (for 2 minutes)

Device: Resting-state electroencephalography
Alpha and beta oscillation power (4 minutes recordings)

Device: Resting-state galvanic skin resistance measures
Skin conductance during the resting state period

Active Comparator: Autogenic relaxation

Participants in the relaxation group listened to a 16 min relaxation audio tape, based on the autogenic training method. Participants were lying on the massage table in supine position, wearing headphones. During this desensitization-relaxation technique, they were guided to visualize bodily perceptions of heaviness and warmth in their arms, thorax and legs. To facilitate concentration, participants were left alone in a dark room.

Other: Psychometric ratings (Likert-scale)
Self-report of perceived anxiety and physical sensations (muscle pain, relaxation and warmth)

Behavioral: Range of motion measures
Sit-and-reach and toe touch tests

Behavioral: Mental calculation task
Iterated substractions (for 2 minutes)

Device: Resting-state electroencephalography
Alpha and beta oscillation power (4 minutes recordings)

Device: Resting-state galvanic skin resistance measures
Skin conductance during the resting state period

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in range of motion measures from standardized flexibility tests [Pretest and an immediate posttest after the intervention]

    Lower back and hamstring flexibility index from sit-and-reach and toe touch tests

  2. Resting-state electroencephalography [Pretest and an immediate posttest after the intervention]

    Power of alpha and beta neural oscillations

  3. Changes in subjective scores (self-reports on numeric rating scales) [Pretest and an immediate posttest after the intervention]

    Perceived anxiety and physical sensations (muscle pain, warmth and relaxation) on a numeric rating scale of 10 cm (0: "Complete absence of anxiety/muscle pain/muscle warmth/muscle relaxation"; 10: "Maximal possible levels of anxiety/muscle pain/muscle warmth/muscle relaxation")

  4. Changes in mental calculation performances [Pretest and an immediate posttest after the intervention]

    Iterated substractions for 2 minutes

  5. Changes in physiological arousal [Pretest and an immediate posttest after the intervention]

    Skin conductance during resting state periods

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Regular practice of foam rolling (10 min routines, 2-3 times per week over the past 6 months)
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Chronic medical conditions including functional limitations that might affect proprioception and/or pain perception

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Villeurbanne France 69622

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Prof. Aymeric Guillot, Professor, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04859140
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LIBMNEURO - AUTOMASSEEG
First Posted:
Apr 26, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Apr 26, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Prof. Aymeric Guillot, Professor, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 26, 2021