FOKhint: Effects of Brain-stimulation on Metamemory Monitoring and Control

Sponsor
Brooklyn College of the City University of New York (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03693729
Collaborator
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) (NIH)
216
1
3
45.9
4.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

When people learn and remember information, it is often accompanied by a feeling of subjective confidence about whether or not information has been learned and accurately remembered. These subjective feelings of confidence are often related to actual memory performance, but are sometimes incorrect. The investigators have previously shown that applying high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex leads to more accurate feelings of subjective confidence, at least when subjects are asked for their confidence about future memory performance. Accurate confidence judgments are useful in that they may later subsequent behavior, and inaccurate ones may be costly. For example, a student who erroneously believes that studied material was learned may stop studying and not do well on a test. Individuals who have a feeling-of-knowing about the answer to a general knowledge question will continue to search their memory, whereas individuals who do not have a feeling-of-knowing will stop searching their memory. Individuals who are confident they know the answer to a question are more likely to answer it. In this study, the experimenters are testing the effects of brain stimulation on subjective awareness of memory (termed metamemory monitoring) and how people use those subjective judgments (termed metamemory control). The approach taken is to have participants visit the laboratory on 3 visits and receive brain stimulation while completing memory and metamemory tasks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: HD-tDCS
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
216 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Effects of Brain-stimulation on Memory and Memory Awareness
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 3, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Active DLPFC during task

HD-tDCS will be applied over the DLPFC at 2mA in a single session for up to 30 min during the memory and metamemory task

Device: HD-tDCS
Participants will complete a metamemory and memory task
Other Names:
  • Behavioral
  • Active Comparator: Active DLPFC after task

    HD-tDCS will be applied over the DLPFC at 2mA in a single session for up to 30 min after the memory and metamemory task and during a filler task.

    Device: HD-tDCS
    Participants will complete a metamemory and memory task
    Other Names:
  • Behavioral
  • Sham Comparator: Sham DLPFC during task

    Sham HD-tDCS will be applied over the DLPFC at 2mA in a single session for up to 30 min during the memory and metamemory task

    Device: HD-tDCS
    Participants will complete a metamemory and memory task
    Other Names:
  • Behavioral
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Memory Control Advantage Index [Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks]

      This indexes the memory advantage for choosing which general knowledge question one receives a hint about the answer to versus having the experimenter choose which general knowledge question one receives a hint about the answer. The investigators will subtract the proportion of correctly recognized general knowledge answers for experimenter-chosen questions from the proportion correctly recognized for participant-chosen questions

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. semantic recognition as assessed by a general knowledge task [Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks]

      Differences in recognition are compared between each condition (each active HD-tDCS and sham).

    2. semantic recall as assessed by a general knowledge task [Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks]

      Differences in recall are compared between each condition (each active HD-tDCS and sham).

    3. Feeling-of-knowing ratings and their accuracy [Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks]

      Feeling of knowing ratings are given on a scale. To assess the accuracy of these ratings, the subjective ratings are compared to objective accuracy, using signal detection based measures. Differences in feeling-of-knowing ratings and their accuracy are compared between each condition (each active HD-tDCS and sham).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 35 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Healthy, right-handed adults ages 18-35. English spoken since age 5. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Participants will be excluded if they have chronic skin disease or a medical skin condition, or an unhealed open wound on the scalp, face, neck, or forehead near the electrode location.

    • Participants will be excluded if they self-report significant medical, neurological, or psychiatric illness and/or a history of substance abuse

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Brooklyn College Brooklyn New York United States 11210

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Brooklyn College of the City University of New York
    • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Elizabeth Chua, Associate Professor, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03693729
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • BrooklynC
    • SC3GM121192
    First Posted:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 10, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Elizabeth Chua, Associate Professor, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 10, 2020