Yoga, Immune Function, and Health
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is designed to examine the impact of hatha yoga on immune and hormonal functioning in healthy individuals.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This study is designed to examine the effects of hatha yoga on autonomic, immune, and endocrine function. The data from both inexperienced and experienced groups will help us better understand how longer-term practice of yoga may be beneficial. The study consists of one 3-hour screening session and three 6-hour activity sessions with 30 minute follow-up appointments the following morning scheduled 2 - 4 weeks apart. Each participant will complete the 3 activity sessions, which will consist of either yoga, mild movement, or a neutral activity (watching a videotape), in randomly assigned order. Thus, both novices and experts will participate in 3 activity sessions each (yoga, movement control, video control). The order in which each participant goes through the activity sessions is counterbalanced. Data for each activity session will be aggregated by group (i.e. novice or expert). We will measure responses to tape stripping to assess skin barrier repair, and evaluate responses to computer tasks, self-report measures, and a battery of unobtrusive behavioral measures. We will also collect blood and saliva samples to measure immune and endocrine outcomes.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Hatha yoga classes Groups consisted of novices or experts. Groups were counterbalanced to ensure that equal number of novices and experts participated in each possible session combination, in a randomly assigned order. |
Behavioral: Hatha Yoga Classes
Iyengar yoga, the form of hatha yoga used in this study, emphasizes the use of props to help students achieve precise postures safely and comfortably according to their particular body types and needs. The yoga activity sessions were directed by four experienced yoga teachers following a script. The poses used were (in order) Supta Baddha Konasana (Reclining Bound Angle Pose), Adho Mukha Svanasana (Downward Facing Dog), Supported Uttanasana (Intense Forward Stretch), Parsvotanasana (Intense Side Stretch Pose), Prasarita Padottanansana (Wide-Legged Forward Bend), Janu Sirsasana (Head to Knee Pose), Bharadvajasana (Simple Seated Twist Pose), Viparita Karani (Restful Inversion), Supported Setu Bandha Sarvanagasana (Bridge Pose), and Savasana (Corpse Pose). Blood draws occurred during the last two minutes of Supta Baddha Konasana (pose held 10 minutes), Viparita Karani (10 minutes), and Savasana (15 minutes).
|
Sham Comparator: Movement Control Non-Hatha yoga gentle movement. Groups consisted of novices or experts. Groups were counterbalanced to ensure that equal number of novices and experts participated in each possible session combination, in a randomly assigned order. |
Behavioral: Movement Control
Walking on a treadmill at .5 miles per hour was used to control for general physical movement/cardiovascular expenditure because it best approximated the heart rates during the restorative yoga session. To match the lower heart rate, women also rested supine on a bed for several minutes after walking, before and after getting their blood drawn.
|
No Intervention: Passive Video Control Another control condition, a neutral video that did not include any music, allowed us to contrast the effects of yoga with no activity.The session included a sequence on how to design physics experiments for a high school classroom, as well as segments from two lectures on polymers and quantum mechanics. Groups were counterbalanced to ensure that equal number of novices and experts participated in each possible session combination, in a randomly assigned order. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Detectable C-Reactive Protein (CRP) [8:30 a.m. at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart]
High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) assessed once at baseline, at each of the three visits. The hsCRP assay was performed using chemiluminescence methodology with the Immulite 1000 (Siemens Medical Solutions, Los Angeles, Ca.) The lowest level of detection is .3 mg/dL. 43% of the values were below this lower bound, thus hsCRP was dichotomized as undetectable/detectable.
- Cortisol [Day 1 8:30, 10:05, 10:58, 11:35, 12:05, 13:10. Day 2 7:30]
All cortisol and catecholamine samples for a subject were frozen after collection and analyzed within the same assay run after the participant had completed the study.
- Skin Barrier Repair: Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) [11:50, 12:50 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart]
Cellophane tape stripping, a common dermatological paradigm for studying restoration of the skin barrier, was used to examine whether the time necessary for recovery from minor physical insults varied by condition or yoga expertise. Measurement of the rate of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) through human skin provides a noninvasive method to monitor changes in the skin's barrier function. TEWL was measured twice during the session using a computerized evaporimetry instrument, the DermaLab® (CyberDERM, Media, PA), and barrier recovery was calculated.
- Immune Function: Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6r) [Day 1 8:30, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30]
Serum levels of the sIL-6r were assayed using Quantikine High Sensitivity Immunoassay kits (R&D), per kit instructions.
- Immune Function: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) [Day 1 8:30, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30]
Serum levels of TNF-α were assayed using Quantikine High Sensitivity Immunoassay kits (R&D), per kit instructions.
- Immune Function: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) -Stimulated Production of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) [Day 1 8:30, 10:05, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30]
Supernatants from PBLs stimulated with 5μg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 72 h were assayed for IL-6 and TNF-α using ELISA kits (B-D Pharmingen).
- Immune Function: LPS-stimulated Production of TNF-α [Day 1 8:30, 10:05, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30]
Supernatants from PBLs stimulated with 5μg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 72 h were assayed for IL-6 and TNF-α using ELISA kits (B-D Pharmingen).
- Immune Function: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) [Day 1 8:30, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30]
Serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and the sIL-6r were assayed using Quantikine High Sensitivity Immunoassay kits (R&D), per kit instructions
- Catecholamine Production: Epinephrine [8:30, 10:05, 10:28, 10:58, 11:35, 12:05 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart]
All cortisol and catecholamine samples for a subject were frozen after collection and analyzed within the same assay run after the participant had completed the study.
- Catecholamine Production: Norepinephrine [8:30, 10:05, 10:28, 10:58, 11:35, 12:05]
All cortisol and catecholamine samples for a subject were frozen after collection and analyzed within the same assay run after the participant had completed the study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Heart Rate [Day 1: 8:30, 9:15, 9:45, 10:00, 10:45, 11:35, 12:05, 12:15]
- Blood Pressure [7:55 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart]
- Mood: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)Positive [7:35, 11:45, 12:30 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart]
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) includes two 10-item mood scales. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = very slightly or not at all to 5 = extremely, to indicate the extent to which the respondent has felt this way in the indicated time frame. Several additional words were added to better capture low positive affect: happy, satisfied, disappointed, discouraged, low, sad.
- Mood: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)Negative [7:35, 11:45, 12:30 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart]
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) includes two 10-item mood scales. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = very slightly or not at all to 5 = extremely, to indicate the extent to which the respondent has felt this way in the indicated time frame. Several additional words were added to better capture low positive affect: happy, satisfied, disappointed, discouraged, low, sad.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
healthy female adults
-
relatively inexperienced with yoga (beginner)
-
experienced with yoga (advanced practitioner)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Treatment with medication that has immunological or endocrinological consequences
-
Chronic health problems that affect immune or endocrine systems
-
Anemia
-
Use of psychoactive drugs or mood-altering medication
-
Smoking
-
Needle or blood phobias
-
Tape or bandage allergies
-
Pregnancy or nursing within the previous 3 months
-
Heart problems
-
History of hip or knee replacement surgery, displaced vertebrae, and any other physical limitations that would prevent full participation in the program
-
use of statins, beta blockers
-
excessive alcohol use
-
convulsive disorders
-
Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State University Clinical Research Center | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43210 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ohio State University
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser, PhD, Ohio State University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- 2005H0068
- R21AT002971-01
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Women were recruited through online ads and notices posted in yoga studios. All women participated in some form of hatha yoga. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Expert: Movement Control Then Hatha Yoga Then Video | Expert: Hatha Yoga Then Video Then Movement Control | Expert: Video Then Movement Control Then Hatha Yoga | Expert: Movement Control Then Video Then Hatha Yoga | Expert: Hatha Yoga Then Movement Control Then Video | Expert: Video Then Hatha Yoga Then Movement Control | Novice: Movement Control Then Hatha Yoga Then Video | Novice: Hatha Yoga Then Video Then Movement Control | Novice: Video Then Movement Control Then Hatha Yoga | Novice: Movement Control Then Video Then Hatha Yoga | Novice: Hatha Yoga Then Movement Control Then Video | Novice: Video Then Hatha Yoga Then Movement Control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants are female Yoga experts, meaning they have practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. For Session 1, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Hatha Yoga Class in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga experts, meaning they have practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. For Session 1, participants completed the Hatha Yoga Class in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga experts, meaning they have practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. For Session 1, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Hatha Yoga Class in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga experts, meaning they have practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. For Session 1, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga experts, meaning they have practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. For Session 1, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga experts, meaning they have practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. For Session 1, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga novices, meaning they had participated in yoga classes or practiced at home with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. For Session 1, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga novices, meaning they had participated in yoga classes or practiced at home with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. For Session 1, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga novices, meaning they had participated in yoga classes or practiced at home with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. For Session 1, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga novices, meaning they had participated in yoga classes or practiced at home with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. For Session 1, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. | Participants are female Yoga novices, meaning they had participated in yoga classes or practiced at home with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. For Session 1, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. For Session 3, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. | Participants are female Yoga novices, meaning they had participated in yoga classes or practiced at home with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. For Session 1, participants completed the Video Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 2, participants completed the Hatha Yoga session in 1 day, a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning, followed by 2-4 weeks of normal daily activity. For Session 3, participants completed the Movement Control Activity in 1 day and a 30 minute follow-up session the next morning. |
Period Title: Session 1 | ||||||||||||
STARTED | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
COMPLETED | 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Session 1 | ||||||||||||
STARTED | 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
COMPLETED | 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Session 1 | ||||||||||||
STARTED | 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
COMPLETED | 4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women were exposed to each of the conditions (yoga, movement control, and passive-video control) during three separate visits. The order of the visits was randomized per participant. 52 total participants enrolled. |
Overall Participants | 52 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
52
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
41.32
(10.33)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
52
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
52
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Participants With Detectable C-Reactive Protein (CRP) |
---|---|
Description | High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) assessed once at baseline, at each of the three visits. The hsCRP assay was performed using chemiluminescence methodology with the Immulite 1000 (Siemens Medical Solutions, Los Angeles, Ca.) The lowest level of detection is .3 mg/dL. 43% of the values were below this lower bound, thus hsCRP was dichotomized as undetectable/detectable. |
Time Frame | 8:30 a.m. at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Novice | Expert |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Women were classified as novices if they had participated in yoga classes or home practice with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. | Women were classified as Experts if they had practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. |
Measure Participants | 25 | 25 |
Number [participants with CRP above 0.3] |
16
30.8%
|
8
NaN
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Novice, Expert |
---|---|---|
Comments | hsCRP dichotomized as undetectable/detectable. Logistic regression w/generalized estimating equations(GEE)s to determine odds ratio. Assessed hsCRP at baseline at each of the three visits; 43% of the values (n = 65) were below the assay's detectable lower bound of .3 mg/dL, and thus hsCRP was dichotomized as undetectable/detectable. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .009 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 4.75 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Cortisol |
---|---|
Description | All cortisol and catecholamine samples for a subject were frozen after collection and analyzed within the same assay run after the participant had completed the study. |
Time Frame | Day 1 8:30, 10:05, 10:58, 11:35, 12:05, 13:10. Day 2 7:30 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Skin Barrier Repair: Trans-epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) |
---|---|
Description | Cellophane tape stripping, a common dermatological paradigm for studying restoration of the skin barrier, was used to examine whether the time necessary for recovery from minor physical insults varied by condition or yoga expertise. Measurement of the rate of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) through human skin provides a noninvasive method to monitor changes in the skin's barrier function. TEWL was measured twice during the session using a computerized evaporimetry instrument, the DermaLab® (CyberDERM, Media, PA), and barrier recovery was calculated. |
Time Frame | 11:50, 12:50 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Immune Function: Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6r) |
---|---|
Description | Serum levels of the sIL-6r were assayed using Quantikine High Sensitivity Immunoassay kits (R&D), per kit instructions. |
Time Frame | Day 1 8:30, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Immune Function: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) |
---|---|
Description | Serum levels of TNF-α were assayed using Quantikine High Sensitivity Immunoassay kits (R&D), per kit instructions. |
Time Frame | Day 1 8:30, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Immune Function: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) -Stimulated Production of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) |
---|---|
Description | Supernatants from PBLs stimulated with 5μg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 72 h were assayed for IL-6 and TNF-α using ELISA kits (B-D Pharmingen). |
Time Frame | Day 1 8:30, 10:05, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Immune Function: LPS-stimulated Production of TNF-α |
---|---|
Description | Supernatants from PBLs stimulated with 5μg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 72 h were assayed for IL-6 and TNF-α using ELISA kits (B-D Pharmingen). |
Time Frame | Day 1 8:30, 10:05, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Immune Function: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) |
---|---|
Description | Serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and the sIL-6r were assayed using Quantikine High Sensitivity Immunoassay kits (R&D), per kit instructions |
Time Frame | Day 1 8:30, 11:35, 13:10. Day 2 7:30 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Catecholamine Production: Epinephrine |
---|---|
Description | All cortisol and catecholamine samples for a subject were frozen after collection and analyzed within the same assay run after the participant had completed the study. |
Time Frame | 8:30, 10:05, 10:28, 10:58, 11:35, 12:05 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Catecholamine Production: Norepinephrine |
---|---|
Description | All cortisol and catecholamine samples for a subject were frozen after collection and analyzed within the same assay run after the participant had completed the study. |
Time Frame | 8:30, 10:05, 10:28, 10:58, 11:35, 12:05 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Heart Rate |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Day 1: 8:30, 9:15, 9:45, 10:00, 10:45, 11:35, 12:05, 12:15 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Blood Pressure |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | 7:55 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Mood: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)Positive |
---|---|
Description | The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) includes two 10-item mood scales. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = very slightly or not at all to 5 = extremely, to indicate the extent to which the respondent has felt this way in the indicated time frame. Several additional words were added to better capture low positive affect: happy, satisfied, disappointed, discouraged, low, sad. |
Time Frame | 7:35, 11:45, 12:30 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Mood: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)Negative |
---|---|
Description | The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) includes two 10-item mood scales. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = very slightly or not at all to 5 = extremely, to indicate the extent to which the respondent has felt this way in the indicated time frame. Several additional words were added to better capture low positive affect: happy, satisfied, disappointed, discouraged, low, sad. |
Time Frame | 7:35, 11:45, 12:30 at each of the three visits, scheduled at least 2 weeks apart |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Novice | Expert | ||
Arm/Group Description | Women were classified as novices if they had participated in yoga classes or home practice with yoga videos for 6 - 12 sessions. | Women were classified as Experts if they had practiced yoga regularly 1-2 times per week (75-90 min sessions) for at least 2 years, and at least 2 times per week for the past year. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Novice | Expert | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Novice | Expert | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/26 (0%) | 0/26 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Novice | Expert | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/26 (0%) | 0/26 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, PhD |
---|---|
Organization | Ohio State University Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research |
Phone | 614-292-0033 |
Kiecolt-Glaser.1@osu.edu |
- 2005H0068
- R21AT002971-01