Task Training In Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss

Sponsor
Pamukkale University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05190081
Collaborator
(none)
43
1
3
18
2.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study aimed to examine the effects of single and dual-task training on physical function, cognitive function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, and activities of daily living in the elderly with age-related hearing loss.

The elderly who were diagnosed with age-related hearing loss in Pamukkale University Health, Practice and Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology participated in the study. The elderly were allocated a single-task training group, dual-task training group, and control group. Thirteen patients in the single-task training group, 15 patients in the dual-task training group, 14 patients in the control group completed the study. Degrees of hearing loss were determined by pure tone audiometry. Evaluations, Senior Fitness Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, World Health Organization- Quality of Life- Old Module, Berg Balance Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale International, Functional Independence Measure, Dual Task Questionnaire, Dual Task Effect, were performed initially, after the interventions and at the 6th month. The interventions were carried out two days a week and 40 minutes, for five weeks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: TASK TRAINING
N/A

Detailed Description

Outcome Measures Physical function, cognitive function, auditory function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, independence in activities of daily living, and dual-task performance were evaluated. Older adults were evaluated initially, after the dual-task and single-task training, and at 6th month for long-term control. All evaluations and interventions were carried out in an isolated and quiet environment in the examination room of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology.

Interventions A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group, were completed separately in the single-task training group. No intervention was performed in the control group. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week. It has been tried to prevent the learning effect by providing individual and weekly progress according to the patients' performance in the tasks in the motor and cognitive parts. Variable priority instructions were used in the dual-task training group, and fixed priority instructions were used in the single-task training group. At the beginning and end of the intervention programs, 7 types of warm-up and cool-down exercises involving large muscle groups were performed for 10-minutes. Each task in the intervention programs was performed for 60 seconds and/or 10 repetitions.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
43 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Intervention groups were formed as single-task training, dual-task training, and control group. Distribution was made into groups using a simple randomized number selection technique.Intervention groups were formed as single-task training, dual-task training, and control group. Distribution was made into groups using a simple randomized number selection technique.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Investigation Of the Effects Of Dual-Task And Single-Task Training In Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 23, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: single-task training group

Tasks were completed separately in the single-task training group

Other: TASK TRAINING
A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week.

Experimental: dual-task training group

Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group

Other: TASK TRAINING
A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week.

No Intervention: control group

No intervention was performed in the control group

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Senior Fitness Test [Initially, 1st week]

    This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests

  2. Senior Fitness Test [At 5th week]

    This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests

  3. Senior Fitness Test [Through study completion at 6th month]

    This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests

  4. Montreal Cognitive Assessment [Initially, 1st week]

    It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal

  5. Montreal Cognitive Assessment [At 5th week]

    It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal

  6. Montreal Cognitive Assessment [Through study completion at 6th month]

    It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal

  7. Pure tone audiometry [Initially, 1st week]

    Pure tone audiometry at 6 different frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 kHz) frequently mentioned in the literature was performed by an audiologist with a clinical audiometer

  8. World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module [Initially, 1st week]

    It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.

  9. World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module [At 5th week]

    It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.

  10. World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module [Through study completion at 6th month]

    It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Berg Balance Scale [Initially, 1st week]

    It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance

  2. Berg Balance Scale [At 5th week]

    It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance

  3. Berg Balance Scale [Through study completion at 6th month]

    It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance

  4. International Fall Efficiency Scale [Initially, 1st week]

    : It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established

  5. International Fall Efficiency Scale [At 5th week]

    : It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established

  6. International Fall Efficiency Scale [Through study completion at 6th month]

    : It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established

  7. Functional Independence Measurement [Initially, 1st week]

    FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.

  8. Functional Independence Measurement [At 5th week]

    FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.

  9. Functional Independence Measurement [Through study completion at 6th month]

    FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.

  10. Dual Task Questionnaire [Initially, 1st week]

    : DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.

  11. Dual Task Questionnaire [At 5th week]

    : DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.

  12. Dual Task Questionnaire [Through study completion at 6th month]

    : DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Being >65 years old

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale score > 21

  • Diagnosed with Age-Related Hearing Loss

  • Having bilateral symmetrical hearing loss (average ±10dB difference)

  • Having normal visual functions

  • Ability to ambulate independently (may use a self-help device)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Using a hearing aid

  • Receiving a physical therapy intervention for Age-Related Hearing Loss

  • Having an orthopedic or neurological condition that may affect cognition or postural control

  • Using medication that may affect cognition or postural control

  • Having vertigo or being hospitalized in the emergency room due to vertigo attacks

  • Missing or refusing the follow-up

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Pamukkale University Denizli Kinikli Turkey 20070

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Pamukkale University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: HANDE USTA, PHD, Pamukkale University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
HANDE USTA, Doctor, Research Assisstant, Pamukkale University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05190081
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 60116787-020/1933.
First Posted:
Jan 13, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jan 13, 2022
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by HANDE USTA, Doctor, Research Assisstant, Pamukkale University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 13, 2022