Comparison of PEEP in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Sponsor
Asan Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04853563
Collaborator
(none)
120
1
2
36.3
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Little is known about optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patiens who recieved invasive mechanical ventilation for acute decompensated heart failure. We therefore sought to compare clinical outcome according to low versus high PEEP.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: PEEP
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of High VErsus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Heart Failure (HELP-AFH) : Open-label Randomized Controlled Multi-center Pilot Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 20, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 30, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: High PEEP

Immediate after initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation and randomization, the PEEP level is set to be at 8 centimetre of water with an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) between 0.21 and 0.6. Thereafter, the PEEP level is adjusted to 1 centimetre of water higher to a minimum PEEP level of 10 with every 30 minutes.

Other: PEEP
High PEEP targeted to 10 cmH2O to be maintained during the period of mechanical ventilation compared with low PEEP maintaining 3-5 cmH2O

Active Comparator: Low PEEP

Immediate after initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation and randomization, the PEEP level is set to be at 5 centimetre of water with an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) between 0.21 and 0.6. In this arm, the PEEP level is adjusted to 1 centimetre of water lower to a minimum PEEP level of 3 with every 30 minutes while maintaining a partial pressure of arterial blood oxygen above 65 millimeter of mercury or oxygen saturation >92% with pulse oxymetry.

Other: PEEP
High PEEP targeted to 10 cmH2O to be maintained during the period of mechanical ventilation compared with low PEEP maintaining 3-5 cmH2O

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Ventilator-free day at 28-day [up to 28-day]

    Starting at the day of randomization, and the days on non-invasive ventilation do not count. Successful extubation is defined as at least 24 hours wihtout reintubation independent of invasive assisted ventilation in survivor. Non-survivor within 28 days: ventilator-free day counted as 0, ventilator-free day among only survivor at 28-day will be counted for primary endpoint.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Subject who was diagnosed with congestive heart failure and objective evidence of pulmonary congestion (pulmonary edema on simple chest radiography or positive B-line on lung ultrasonography AND elevated B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level) as a reason for invasive mechanical ventilation

  2. Age over 19 years old

  3. Subject who agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Subject who are on mechanical circulatory support (ECMO, intra-aortic balloon pump, VAD) at the time of randomization

  2. Subject who has cardiac abnormality that requires emergent or urgent percutaneous or surgical valvular procedure

  3. Subject who are on vasoactive or inotropic agents at least moderate dose defined as vasoactive-inotropic score >10

  4. Isolated preload-dependent cardiac dysfunction (isolated right ventricular failure, right ventricular infarction, constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, severe pulmonary hypertension without LV dysfunction)

  5. Predominant right ventricular failure defined as following; clinical evidence of right ventricular failure by attending physician's discretion including hepatojugular reflux, Kussmaul sign, cardiac liver cirrhosis, hepato/splenomegaly, acites, thronmbocytopenia, etc.

  6. Subject who are not on mechanical ventilation before open heart surgery

  7. Subject who received unwitness cardiopulmonary rescucitation (CPR) or witness CPR lasting more than 30 minutes

  8. Subject who was already diagnosed or is suspected to have hypertophic cardiomyopathy with significant left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction

  9. Subject with intracranial hemorrahge or ischemic stroke at the time of randomization

  10. Subject with irreversible neurologic damage or irreversible hepatic failure

  11. Invasive mechanical ventilation lasting more than 24 hours preceding endotracheal intubation

  12. Subject with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD classification III or IV) or restrictive pulmonary disease (e.g. interstitial lung disease)

  13. Subject with impaired consciousness that can not perform self coughing and need suction to maintain adequate airway patency

  14. Pregnant and/or lactating women

  15. Subject with life expectancy less than a year

  16. Subject who is not suitable to enrollment by investigator's discretion

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Asan Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of 05505

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Asan Medical Center

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Min-Seok Kim, professor of medicine, Asan Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04853563
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AMC_2021_0433
First Posted:
Apr 21, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Feb 23, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 23, 2022