FIX-HF-5C2: Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the 2-lead OPTIMIZER® Smart System

Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03339310
Collaborator
(none)
60
10
1
24.2
6
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study of the Optimizer Smart System with 2-leads

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Optimizer Smart System with 2-leads
N/A

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm treatment only confirmatory study of the 2-lead configuration of the Optimizer Smart System.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Optimizer Smart SystemOptimizer Smart System
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
FIX-HF-5C2: Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the 2-lead OPTIMIZER® Smart System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure With Ejection Fraction Between 25% and 45%
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 23, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Optimizer Smart System with 2-leads

All eligible subjects will have the Optimizer Smart System implanted and receive cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCM).

Device: Optimizer Smart System with 2-leads
The Optimizer Smart System with 2-leads delivers non-excitatory cardiac contractility modulating (CCM) electrical signals to the heart muscle. Implanted subjects receive five non-contiguous one-hour periods of CCM signals per day.
Other Names:
  • Optimizer Smart System
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX). [24 weeks]

      Device efficacy will be assessed as change in exercise tolerance quantified by peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX). Subjects on device under FIX-HF-5C2 protocol will be compared to subjects on control under FIX-HF-5C protocol with respect to peak V02 mean change at 24-weeks from baseline.

    2. Optimizer-device and -procedure related complication rate [24 weeks]

      Subjects experiencing an Optimizer device- or procedure-related complication through the 24-week study period, as determined by an independent events committee.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Total CCM delivery comparing 2 and 3-lead device configurations [24 weeks]

      A comparison will be made between the Optimizer per-protocol groups in the FIX-HF-5C (3-lead) and FIX-HF-5C2 (2-lead) device configurations to show there is no difference between the amount of CCM therapy provided by the two device configurations. Total CCM delivery (effective hours delivered) will be evaluated at the end of 24 weeks following the Optimizer implantation.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subjects who are 18 years of age or older

    • Subject is male or a non-pregnant female

    • Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction greater than or equal to 25% and less than or equal to 45% by echocardiography determined by the echocardiography core laboratory.

    • Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the subject is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III and IV at the time of enrollment.

    • Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure according to guideline recommendations. For patients with EF≤35%, this regimen shall consist of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Angiotensin receptor -neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) may be substituted for ACE inhibitors or ARBs and Ivabradine may also be considered in subjects with a heart rate >70bpm. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose.

    • Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD, e.g., EF≤35%) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons.

    • Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Subjects whose baseline peak VO2 is <9 or >20 ml O2/min/kg. The qualifying CPX test must be deemed adequate.

    • Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease.

    • Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days before enrollment, or angina and/or ECG changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation.

    • Subjects hospitalized for heart failure requiring acute treatment with intravenous loop diuretics, IV inotropes or hemofiltration within 30 days before enrollment and baseline testing or subjects receiving any form of positive inotropic support within 30 days before enrollment, including continuous IV inotrope therapy.

    • Subjects having a PR interval greater than 375ms.

    • Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to perform baseline stress testing.

    • Subjects who are scheduled for a CABG or a PTCA procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment.

    • Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system, an accepted indication for such a device, or a QRS width of 130ms or greater.

    • Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment.

    • Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid valve.

    • Subjects who have a prior heart transplant.

    • Subjects on dialysis.

    • Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol.

    • Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Chan Heart Rhythm Institute Mesa Arizona United States 85206
    2 Southwest Cardiology Associates Mesa Arizona United States 85206
    3 Cardiovascular Consultants Phoenix Arizona United States 85032
    4 Arizona Arrhythmia Consultants Scottsdale Arizona United States 85251
    5 Pima Heart Physicians, PC Tucson Arizona United States 85712
    6 Baptist Health Systems Lexington Illinois United States 40503
    7 Ochsner Clinic Foundation New Orleans Louisiana United States 70121
    8 Dallas VA Hospital Dallas Texas United States 75216
    9 CHRISTUS Trinity Mother Frances Tyler Texas United States 75701
    10 University Hospital gGmbH Bergmannsheil Bochum Germany 44789

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Impulse Dynamics

    Investigators

    • Study Director: David D. Gutterman, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Impulse Dynamics
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03339310
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CP OPT2017-005
    • FIX-HF-5C2
    First Posted:
    Nov 13, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 14, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Impulse Dynamics
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 14, 2020