SimVAD: Use of Simulation to Improve VAD Self-management
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the performance of a curriculum using medical simulators to train patients with advanced heart failure and their caregivers to master the self-management of ventricular assist devices (a device implanted into the heart to help circulate the blood). The investigators expect this training will improve self-management skills, and reduce VAD-related infections and re-hospitalizations. In addition to providing innovative training to the patients and their caregivers, the study will advance our knowledge of the effects of simulation-based training on patient self-management and safety.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Traditional VAD training Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. |
|
Experimental: Simulation-based VAD training Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management |
Other: Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML)
The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Comparisons of VAD-care Checklist Assessment on the Patient and Written Examination Scores Between SBML and Usual Training Groups [3 months]
The investigators will compare the performance of the SBML intervention group to the usual VAD training group during actual VAD care activities (controller change, power source change and dressing change) plus a written examination. Only caregivers were assessed on dressing change as patients do not independently complete this task.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Infections and Re-hospitalizations up to 3 Months After VAD Implant [3 months after discharge]
All VAD related driveline infections and re-hospitalizations between the SBML intervention group as compared to the usual VAD training group
- Self-management Skill Decay in the Five Domains [1 month and 3 months after discharge (*1 month SBML-trained only)]
The investigators will measure the change in skill decay on the patient from 0 (time of implant), one and three months using VAD self-management checklists (controller change, power source change and dressing change) throughout the study period.
- Comparisons of Self-confidence Between Groups [3 months]
Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML) Trained and Usual Trained Patient and Caregiver Reported Self-Confidence (0=very low confidence to 100=very high confidence) before Discharge Testing on Five VAD Skills.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
-
being a previous or current VAD implantation patient,
-
age >18,
-
English-speaking,
-
receiving implantation and VAD care at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH),
-
meet hospital criteria for VAD implantation.
Caregiver inclusion criteria:
-
being a caregiver identified by a previous or current VAD implantation patient,
-
age >18, and
-
English-speaking.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Vulnerable populations of patients will not be included in this study (including fetuses, neonates, children, pregnant women, prisoners, mentally retarded or incompetent individuals, institutionalized individuals, or individuals unable to give consent due to their medical condition). Fetuses and neonates are not the focus of our study.
-
Pregnant women will not be included since pregnancy is a contraindication to VAD implantation It is possible that VAD caregivers may be pregnant at the time of the study.
-
Patients with mental retardation, mental incompetence, or patients who are unable to give consent due to their medical condition will not be included as they will not be able to complete measures.
-
Lastly, institutionalized individuals will not be included as access will be a problem, and these individuals are rarely referred for VAD implantation
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60611 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Northwestern University
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Barsuk, MD, Northwestern University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- STU00203530
- 5R21NR016745-02
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Traditional VAD Training (Caregivers) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Caregivers) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | Caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
STARTED | 33 | 37 | 36 | 37 |
Received Initial Training | 29 | 29 | 33 | 33 |
COMPLETED | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 |
NOT COMPLETED | 8 | 12 | 12 | 13 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Traditional VAD Training (Caregivers) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Caregivers) | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 33 | 37 | 36 | 37 | 143 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.91
(13.25)
|
53.43
(14.95)
|
51.33
(14.54)
|
55.28
(12.68)
|
53.71
(13.85)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
9
27.3%
|
30
81.1%
|
10
27.8%
|
27
73%
|
76
53.1%
|
Male |
24
72.7%
|
7
18.9%
|
26
72.2%
|
10
27%
|
67
46.9%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||||
Hispanic or Latino |
3
9.1%
|
2
5.4%
|
6
16.7%
|
4
10.8%
|
15
10.5%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
30
90.9%
|
35
94.6%
|
30
83.3%
|
33
89.2%
|
128
89.5%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.8%
|
1
2.7%
|
2
1.4%
|
Asian |
1
3%
|
1
2.7%
|
2
5.6%
|
1
2.7%
|
5
3.5%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
11
33.3%
|
14
37.8%
|
12
33.3%
|
12
32.4%
|
49
34.3%
|
White |
19
57.6%
|
21
56.8%
|
20
55.6%
|
22
59.5%
|
82
57.3%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
2
6.1%
|
1
2.7%
|
1
2.8%
|
1
2.7%
|
5
3.5%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||||
United States |
33
100%
|
37
100%
|
36
100%
|
37
100%
|
143
100%
|
Baseline VAD Checklist Skills (percent of items correct on checklist) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||||
Controller change |
21.42
|
28.57
|
24.04
|
||
Power source change |
22.22
|
76.39
|
55.56
|
||
Dressing change |
23.44
|
23.44
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Comparisons of VAD-care Checklist Assessment on the Patient and Written Examination Scores Between SBML and Usual Training Groups |
---|---|
Description | The investigators will compare the performance of the SBML intervention group to the usual VAD training group during actual VAD care activities (controller change, power source change and dressing change) plus a written examination. Only caregivers were assessed on dressing change as patients do not independently complete this task. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patient and caregiver pairs were included if both the patient and their caregiver completed training and assessments through discharge testing. (*Note- Only caregivers were assessed on dressing change as patients do not independently complete this task.) |
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Traditional VAD Training (Caregivers) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Caregivers) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | Caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. |
Measure Participants | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 |
Written examination |
100
|
97.1
|
100
|
100
|
Controller change |
92.9
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Power source change |
88.9
|
88.9
|
100
|
100
|
Dressing change |
81.3
|
100
|
Title | Infections and Re-hospitalizations up to 3 Months After VAD Implant |
---|---|
Description | All VAD related driveline infections and re-hospitalizations between the SBML intervention group as compared to the usual VAD training group |
Time Frame | 3 months after discharge |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
This outcome is for patients only |
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. |
Measure Participants | 25 | 24 |
Infections |
6
18.2%
|
0
0%
|
Re-hospitalizations |
20
60.6%
|
15
40.5%
|
Title | Self-management Skill Decay in the Five Domains |
---|---|
Description | The investigators will measure the change in skill decay on the patient from 0 (time of implant), one and three months using VAD self-management checklists (controller change, power source change and dressing change) throughout the study period. |
Time Frame | 1 month and 3 months after discharge (*1 month SBML-trained only) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Of the 49 patient and caregiver pairs who completed discharge testing, 15 patient and caregiver pairs in the SBML group completed 1 month and 3 month followup testing and 20 pairs in the usual care group completed 3 month follow-up testing only. |
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Traditional VAD Training (Caregivers) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Caregivers) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | Patients and caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 | 15 | 15 |
One month controller change |
100
|
100
|
||
One month power source change |
100
|
100
|
||
One month dressing change |
100
|
|||
3 month controller change |
85.71
|
78.57
|
100
|
100
|
3 month power source change |
88.89
|
88.89
|
100
|
100
|
3 month dressing change |
78.13
|
100
|
Title | Comparisons of Self-confidence Between Groups |
---|---|
Description | Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML) Trained and Usual Trained Patient and Caregiver Reported Self-Confidence (0=very low confidence to 100=very high confidence) before Discharge Testing on Five VAD Skills. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
patients and caregiver who completed training through hospital discharge |
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Traditional VAD Training (Caregivers) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Caregivers) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | Caregivers will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. |
Measure Participants | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 |
VAD Driveline exit site sterile dressing changes |
40
|
90
|
50
|
100
|
Changing the VAD controller during emergencies |
90
|
100
|
95
|
100
|
Changing power sources on the VAD |
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Troubleshooting emergency VAD-related malfunction |
90
|
90
|
90
|
95
|
Recognizing VAD-specific signs and symptoms |
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 year post patient discharge | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | NOTE: All-Cause Mortality, Serious, and Other [Not Including Serious] Adverse Events were not monitored/assessed in "Traditional VAD Training (Caregivers)" and "Simulation-based VAD Training (Caregivers)" participants because they are not followed clinically as part of this study. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | ||
Arm/Group Description | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer. | Patients will receive traditional training for their VAD via a video produced by the VAD manufacturer and then participate in simulation-based mastery learning for VAD management Simulation-based Mastery Learning (SBML): The SBML training group will first 1) watch the VAD video, then 2) participate in a SBML intervention using the simulator for a) driveline exit site sterile dressing changes; b) performing controller self-tests; c) changing power sources; d) troubleshooting emergent VAD-related malfunction; and e) recognizing specific signs and symptoms requiring immediate contact with the VAD team. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 10/33 (30.3%) | 10/36 (27.8%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/33 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Traditional VAD Training (Patients) | Simulation-based VAD Training (Patients) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/33 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Jeffrey H Barsuk |
---|---|
Organization | Northwestern University |
Phone | 312-926-5924 |
jbarsuk@nm.org |
- STU00203530
- 5R21NR016745-02