aCRT: Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the AdaptivCRT algorithm is at least as good as manual echo based optimization in regard to patient outcomes and cardiac performance
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The trial has 3 primary end points:
-
to demonstrate that over 6-month follow-up, the proportion of the patients improved in the aCRT arm is at least as high as in the Echo arm
-
to demonstrate that cardiac function is similar when using aCRT versus echo-optimized settings
-
to demonstrate that aCRT does not result in inappropriate AV or VV delay settings
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Adaptive CRT (aCRT) arm Intervention: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) with Adaptive CRT algorithm ON |
Device: Adaptive CRT (aCRT)
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) is an algorithm, which provides ambulatory adjustment of pacing configuration (LV-only or BiV) and AV and VV delays based on periodic automatic evaluation of electrical conduction to optimize cardiac function
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Echo-optimized arm Intervention: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) with standard biventricular pacing (Adaptive CRT algorithm OFF) |
Device: Echo
Standard BiV pacing with settings optimized using a standardized echocardiographic protocol
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Patients With Improved Heart Failure Outcomes Clinical Composite Score [randomization to six month visit]
Patients considered worsened if they died, were hospitalized with worsening heart failure (HF), crossed over to other arm, demonstrated worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, or reported moderately/markedly worse on 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant. Patients are improved if they are not worsened and have an improved NYHA or reported moderately/markedly improved on the 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant Global assessment question for the patient: Specifically in reference to your heart failure symptoms, how do you feel today as compared to how you felt before your CRT system was implanted? O Markedly improved O Moderately improved O Mildly improved O No change O Slightly worse O Moderately worse O Markedly worse
- Correlation Between Aortic Velocity Time Integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and Echo-optimized Device Settings [randomization visit and six month visit]
Correlation between aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and echo-optimized device settings. AoVTI is an echocardiographic representative of stroke volume and cardiac performance.
- Percentage of Patients With a Safety Event (Inappropriate AV or VV Delay Settings Related to the aCRT Feature) [randomization to 6 months post randomization]
For each subject, the Adaptive CRT-determined AV and VV delay settings from randomization up to 183-days post-randomization were evaluated to identify any period of 28-days with a wide delay range (>60 ms)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Right Ventricular Pacing Percentage [implant to six months post randomization]
The percentage of time the right ventricle is paced by the device
- Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVi) [baseline to six month visit]
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi).
- Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [baseline to six month visit]
- Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification [baseline to six month visit]
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity. Class - Patient Symptoms I - No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). II- Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). III- Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV- Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
- Change in Distance Walked During the Six Minute Hall Walk [baseline to six month visit]
- Change in Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF) [baseline to six month visit]
The MLWHF is a 21 question survey. Scores range from 0-105, with lower scores indicating better health.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subject is willing to sign and date the study Informed Consent form
-
Subject is at least 18 years of age (or older, if required by local law)
-
Subject is expected to remain available for at least six months of follow-up visits
-
Subject is indicated for a study device that will be implanted within 30 days after signing the Informed Consent form
-
Subject has an intrinsic QRS duration greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds (documented within 30 days prior to enrollment)
-
Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35 percent (method per physician discretion) (documented within 180 days prior to enrollment)
-
Subject is diagnosed with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV (within 30 days prior to enrollment) despite optimal medical therapy which is defined as: ACE-inhibitor (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB), if tolerated, for at least one month prior to implant, AND beta-blocker for at least three months preceding implant, if tolerated, and stable for one month, OR subject has an urgent medical need for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) that precludes waiting the one or three months for the medication requirements for ACE inhibitor, ARB or beta-blocker
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subject has chronic (permanent) atrial arrhythmias for which pharmacological therapy and/or cardioversion have been unsuccessful or have not been attempted
-
Subject has existing CRT system
-
Subject has non-intact or unstable leads
-
Subject has medical conditions that would limit study participation (per physician discretion)
-
Subject is enrolled in one or more concurrent studies that would confound the study results of this study as determined by Medtronic
-
Subject has unstable angina, or experienced an acute myocardial infarction (MI) or received coronary artery revascularization (CABG) or coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (documented within 30 days prior to enrollment)
-
Subject has a mechanical right heart valve or is scheduled to undergo valve repair or valve replacement during the course of the study
-
Subject is post-heart transplant (subjects on the heart transplant list for the first time are not excluded)
-
Subject has a limited life expectancy that would not allow completion of the 6 month visit
-
Subject is pregnant (In the United States, all women of child-bearing potential must undergo a pregnancy test within seven days prior to aCRT download into device)
-
Subject meets the exclusion criteria required by local law
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Huntsville | Alabama | United States | 36264 | |
2 | Anchorage | Alaska | United States | 36264 | |
3 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 36264 | |
4 | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States | 36264 | |
5 | Glendale | California | United States | 36264 | |
6 | San Bernardino | California | United States | 36264 | |
7 | San Diego | California | United States | 36264 | |
8 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States | 36264 | |
9 | Denver | Colorado | United States | 36264 | |
10 | Clearwater | Florida | United States | 36264 | |
11 | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 36264 | |
12 | Orlando | Florida | United States | 36264 | |
13 | Pensacola | Florida | United States | 36264 | |
14 | Augusta | Georgia | United States | 36264 | |
15 | Barrington | Illinois | United States | 36264 | |
16 | Fort Wayne | Indiana | United States | 36264 | |
17 | Davenport | Iowa | United States | 36264 | |
18 | Des Moines | Iowa | United States | 36264 | |
19 | Kansas City | Kansas | United States | 36264 | |
20 | Louisville | Kentucky | United States | 36264 | |
21 | Takoma Park | Maryland | United States | 36264 | |
22 | Burlington | Massachusetts | United States | 36264 | |
23 | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 36264 | |
24 | Grand Rapids | Michigan | United States | 36264 | |
25 | Saginaw | Michigan | United States | 36264 | |
26 | Saint Cloud | Minnesota | United States | 36264 | |
27 | Saint Louis Park | Minnesota | United States | 36264 | |
28 | Saint Paul | Minnesota | United States | 36264 | |
29 | Tupelo | Mississippi | United States | 36264 | |
30 | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | 36264 | |
31 | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 36264 | |
32 | Lincoln | Nebraska | United States | 36264 | |
33 | Morristown | New Jersey | United States | 36264 | |
34 | Brooklyn | New York | United States | 36264 | |
35 | Buffalo | New York | United States | 36264 | |
36 | New York | New York | United States | 36264 | |
37 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 36264 | |
38 | Greensboro | North Carolina | United States | 36264 | |
39 | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 36264 | |
40 | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 36264 | |
41 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 36264 | |
42 | Portland | Oregon | United States | 36264 | |
43 | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | 36264 | |
44 | Spartanburg | South Carolina | United States | 36264 | |
45 | Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States | 36264 | |
46 | Austin | Texas | United States | 36264 | |
47 | Dallas | Texas | United States | 36264 | |
48 | Tyler | Texas | United States | 36264 | |
49 | Burlington | Vermont | United States | 36264 | |
50 | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | 36264 | |
51 | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 36264 | |
52 | Bellingham | Washington | United States | 36264 | |
53 | Spokane | Washington | United States | 36264 | |
54 | Morgantown | West Virginia | United States | 36264 | |
55 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States | 36264 | |
56 | Adelaide | Australia | |||
57 | Camperdown | Australia | |||
58 | Chermside | Australia | |||
59 | Darlinghurst | Australia | |||
60 | Perth | Australia | |||
61 | Spring Hill | Australia | |||
62 | Linz | Austria | |||
63 | Genk | Belgium | |||
64 | Leuven | Belgium | |||
65 | Yvoir | Belgium | |||
66 | Calgary | Canada | |||
67 | London | Canada | |||
68 | Montreal | Canada | |||
69 | Newmarket | Canada | |||
70 | Ottawa | Canada | |||
71 | Victoria | Canada | |||
72 | Aalborg | Denmark | |||
73 | København | Denmark | |||
74 | Odense | Denmark | |||
75 | Århus | Denmark | |||
76 | Bochum | Germany | |||
77 | Hamburg | Germany | |||
78 | Ludenscheid | Germany | |||
79 | Reinbek | Germany | |||
80 | Trier | Germany | |||
81 | Athens | Greece | |||
82 | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | |||
83 | Budapest | Hungary | |||
84 | Milano | Italy | |||
85 | Pavia | Italy | |||
86 | Pedara | Italy | |||
87 | Rozzano | Italy | |||
88 | Osaka | Japan | |||
89 | Tokyo | Japan | |||
90 | Tsukuba city | Japan | |||
91 | Nijmegen | Netherlands | |||
92 | Rotterdam | Netherlands | |||
93 | Bergen | Norway | |||
94 | Oslo | Norway | |||
95 | Tyumen | Russian Federation | |||
96 | Riyadh | Saudi Arabia | |||
97 | Belgrade | Serbia | |||
98 | Nis | Serbia | |||
99 | Sremska Kamenica | Serbia | |||
100 | Albacete | Spain | |||
101 | Madrid | Spain | |||
102 | Majadahonda | Spain | |||
103 | Vitoria-Gasteiz | Spain | |||
104 | Lund | Sweden | |||
105 | Stockholm | Sweden |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Investigators
- Study Chair: Adaptive CRT Trial Leader, Medtronic
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Adaptive CRT
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Total number of: 522 pts enrolled, 1 exit 521 pts with baseline information, 16 exits 505 pts of which 14 unsuccessful implants and 491 successful implants, 12 exits and 1 death 478 randomized (318 to aCRT, 160 to control) |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 318 | 160 |
COMPLETED | 299 | 155 |
NOT COMPLETED | 19 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 318 | 160 | 478 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
65.4
(11.2)
|
66.2
(9.7)
|
65.7
(10.7)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
97
30.5%
|
51
31.9%
|
148
31%
|
Male |
221
69.5%
|
109
68.1%
|
330
69%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
Asian |
8
2.5%
|
3
1.9%
|
11
2.3%
|
Black or African American |
29
9.1%
|
6
3.8%
|
35
7.3%
|
Hispanic or Latino |
13
4.1%
|
5
3.1%
|
18
3.8%
|
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
1
0.6%
|
1
0.2%
|
White or Caucasian |
257
80.8%
|
139
86.9%
|
396
82.8%
|
Two or more races |
3
0.9%
|
1
0.6%
|
4
0.8%
|
Other race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Not available |
7
2.2%
|
5
3.1%
|
12
2.5%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Russia |
1
0.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.2%
|
Hong Kong |
2
0.6%
|
1
0.6%
|
3
0.6%
|
United States |
176
55.3%
|
87
54.4%
|
263
55%
|
Japan |
4
1.3%
|
2
1.3%
|
6
1.3%
|
Spain |
1
0.3%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.2%
|
Saudi Arabia |
1
0.3%
|
1
0.6%
|
2
0.4%
|
Canada |
17
5.3%
|
8
5%
|
25
5.2%
|
Austria |
5
1.6%
|
2
1.3%
|
7
1.5%
|
Netherlands |
11
3.5%
|
5
3.1%
|
16
3.3%
|
Sweden |
2
0.6%
|
2
1.3%
|
4
0.8%
|
Belgium |
6
1.9%
|
3
1.9%
|
9
1.9%
|
Norway |
7
2.2%
|
3
1.9%
|
10
2.1%
|
Denmark |
11
3.5%
|
7
4.4%
|
18
3.8%
|
Italy |
3
0.9%
|
2
1.3%
|
5
1%
|
Australia |
18
5.7%
|
12
7.5%
|
30
6.3%
|
Serbia |
23
7.2%
|
10
6.3%
|
33
6.9%
|
Germany |
31
9.7%
|
14
8.8%
|
45
9.4%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Patients With Improved Heart Failure Outcomes Clinical Composite Score |
---|---|
Description | Patients considered worsened if they died, were hospitalized with worsening heart failure (HF), crossed over to other arm, demonstrated worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, or reported moderately/markedly worse on 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant. Patients are improved if they are not worsened and have an improved NYHA or reported moderately/markedly improved on the 'patient global assessment' compared to before CRT implant Global assessment question for the patient: Specifically in reference to your heart failure symptoms, how do you feel today as compared to how you felt before your CRT system was implanted? O Markedly improved O Moderately improved O Mildly improved O No change O Slightly worse O Moderately worse O Markedly worse |
Time Frame | randomization to six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 318 | 160 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
234
73.6%
|
114
71.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | The non-inferiority margin was 12%. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0002 |
Comments | ||
Method | Farrington-Manning test of two ind. prop | |
Comments |
Title | Correlation Between Aortic Velocity Time Integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and Echo-optimized Device Settings |
---|---|
Description | Correlation between aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI) at Adaptive CRT and echo-optimized device settings. AoVTI is an echocardiographic representative of stroke volume and cardiac performance. |
Time Frame | randomization visit and six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Concordance correlations have been calculated between AoVTI at Adaptive CRT AV and VV settings vs. echo-optimized AV and VV settings at randomization and 6 M. Paired AoVTI measurements were used for concordance correlation analysis, where each subject served as his/her own control. AoVTI was not obtained at both settings for 79 patients. |
Arm/Group Title | All Randomized Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The AoVTI was calculated for each Adaptive CRT subject under two different parameter settings: AV and VV settings determined by Adaptive CRT, and AV and VV settings determined by echo-optimization. Subsequently a concordance correlation was calculated and reported, thus this measure cannot be reported per treatment arm. |
Measure Participants | 399 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Concordance correlation coefficient] |
0.93
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | The pre-specified minimum objective performance criteria was 0.82 | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Percentage of Patients With a Safety Event (Inappropriate AV or VV Delay Settings Related to the aCRT Feature) |
---|---|
Description | For each subject, the Adaptive CRT-determined AV and VV delay settings from randomization up to 183-days post-randomization were evaluated to identify any period of 28-days with a wide delay range (>60 ms) |
Time Frame | randomization to 6 months post randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
17 participants did not have data available for analysis of this endpoint. |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status |
Measure Participants | 301 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
Title | Right Ventricular Pacing Percentage |
---|---|
Description | The percentage of time the right ventricle is paced by the device |
Time Frame | implant to six months post randomization |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 314 | 160 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of right ventricle pacing] |
51.3
(37.9)
|
95.1
(10.5)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVi) |
---|---|
Description | Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index (LVESVi). |
Time Frame | baseline to six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 250 | 123 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [milliliters per meter squared] |
-8.3
(23.3)
|
-10.5
(24.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | The non-inferiority margin is 15 | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | baseline to six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 250 | 123 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent] |
3.9
(10.0)
|
2.9
(9.8)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | The non-inferiority margin is 2.5 | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0009 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification |
---|---|
Description | The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity. Class - Patient Symptoms I - No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). II- Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). III- Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV- Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases. |
Time Frame | baseline to six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 296 | 153 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [NYHA class] |
-1.0
(0.8)
|
-0.8
(0.8)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | The non-inferiority margin is 0.3 | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Distance Walked During the Six Minute Hall Walk |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | baseline to six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 284 | 142 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [meters] |
42.4
(103.3)
|
29.0
(123.0)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | The non-inferiority margin is 30 | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0002 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF) |
---|---|
Description | The MLWHF is a 21 question survey. Scores range from 0-105, with lower scores indicating better health. |
Time Frame | baseline to six month visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) |
Measure Participants | 261 | 135 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
-19.3
(20.7)
|
-17.6
(23.8)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing, Standard Biventricular Pacing |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority | |
Comments | The non-inferiority margin is 5.1 | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.002 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 1 sided | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From randomization to the end of the study, which was 31.3 months for the longest-randomized patient. The average follow-up time was 20.2 months. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing | ||
Arm/Group Description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing: Adaptive CRT pacing software adjusts how the device paces the heart based on the patient's current heart status | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing only (without adaptive pacing) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D): Market approved Medtronic Vision 3D™ CRT-D implantable device (Consulta® CRT-D, Maximo II® CRT-D, or Concerto II® CRT-D) | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 35/318 (11%) | 19/160 (11.9%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 158/318 (49.7%) | 86/160 (53.8%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 6/160 (3.8%) | 6 |
Coagulopathy | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Iron deficiency anaemia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Splenic infarction | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Thrombocytopenia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Acute coronary syndrome | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Acute myocardial infarction | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Angina pectoris | 3/318 (0.9%) | 3 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Angina unstable | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Aortic valve stenosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Arrhythmia supraventricular | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Atrial fibrillation | 4/318 (1.3%) | 5 | 5/160 (3.1%) | 8 |
Atrial flutter | 4/318 (1.3%) | 5 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Cardiac arrest | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cardiac failure | 63/318 (19.8%) | 112 | 35/160 (21.9%) | 58 |
Cardiac failure chronic | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Cardiac tamponade | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Cardio-respiratory arrest | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cardiogenic shock | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Coronary artery disease | 7/318 (2.2%) | 7 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Heart valve incompetence | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Intracardiac thrombus | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 3/160 (1.9%) | 3 |
Mitral valve incompetence | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Myocardial infarction | 2/318 (0.6%) | 3 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pericardial effusion | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pulseless electrical activity | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Sinus tachycardia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Supraventricular tachycardia | 3/318 (0.9%) | 3 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Tachycardia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Tricuspid valve disease | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Tricuspid valve incompetence | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Ventricular arrhythmia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Ventricular fibrillation | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Ventricular tachyarrhythmia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Ventricular tachycardia | 8/318 (2.5%) | 8 | 4/160 (2.5%) | 6 |
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | ||||
Atrial septal defect | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Vertigo | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Vertigo positional | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Eye disorders | ||||
Cataract | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Ascites | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Colitis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Colonic polyp | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Constipation | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Diarrhoea | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Diverticular perforation | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Dysphagia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Enterocutaneous fistula | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Food poisoning | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Gastric haemorrhage | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Gastritis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 4/160 (2.5%) | 5 |
Haematochezia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Inguinal hernia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Intestinal ischaemia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Intestinal obstruction | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pancreatitis acute | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Peptic ulcer | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Peritoneal haemorrhage | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Rectal haemorrhage | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Vomiting | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 2 |
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Chest discomfort | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Chest pain | 6/318 (1.9%) | 6 | 4/160 (2.5%) | 4 |
Device capturing issue | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Device connection issue | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Device dislocation | 11/318 (3.5%) | 11 | 7/160 (4.4%) | 10 |
Device electrical impedance issue | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Device lead damage | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Device misuse | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Device pacing issue | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Device psychogenic complication | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Device stimulation issue | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Hernia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Implant site haematoma | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Implant site pain | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Multi-organ failure | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Non-cardiac chest pain | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Polyp | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Sudden cardiac death | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Undersensing | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholecystitis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cholecystitis acute | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Immune system disorders | ||||
Hypersensitivity | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Anal abscess | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Bacterial infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Bronchitis | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Bronchopneumonia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Campylobacter gastroenteritis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cellulitis | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 3/160 (1.9%) | 3 |
Clostridium difficile colitis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Device related infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Empyema | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Gastroenteritis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Gastroenteritis viral | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Implant site infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 4/160 (2.5%) | 4 |
Infection | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Influenza | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Liver abscess | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Lower respiratory tract infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Parotitis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pelvic abscess | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pneumonia | 16/318 (5%) | 19 | 9/160 (5.6%) | 12 |
Postoperative wound infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 2 |
Respiratory tract infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Sepsis | 7/318 (2.2%) | 9 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Septic shock | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Staphylococcal infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary tract infection | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 4/160 (2.5%) | 4 |
Urosepsis | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Wound infection pseudomonas | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Arteriovenous fistula occlusion | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Fall | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Fracture | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Head injury | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Hip fracture | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Lumbar vertebral fracture | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pocket erosion | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Post procedural haemorrhage | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Post-traumatic neck syndrome | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Spinal compression fracture | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Investigations | ||||
Blood bilirubin abnormal | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Clostridium test positive | 1/318 (0.3%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Dehydration | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Diabetes mellitus | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Hyperglycaemia | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 3/160 (1.9%) | 3 |
Hyperkalaemia | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Hypernatraemia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Hypoglycaemia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 3/160 (1.9%) | 3 |
Hyponatraemia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 3/160 (1.9%) | 3 |
Hypovolaemia | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Cervical spinal stenosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Flank pain | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Gouty arthritis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Neck pain | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Osteoarthritis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Pain in jaw | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Rhabdomyolysis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Gallbladder cancer | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatic neoplasm malignant | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 2 |
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Gastric cancer | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Lung neoplasm malignant | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Lymphoma | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Metastases to gastrointestinal tract | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasm malignant | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Carotid artery stenosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Cerebellar infarction | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cerebral infarction | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Cerebrovascular accident | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Cervical root pain | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Dementia | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Encephalopathy | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Haemorrhage intracranial | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Headache | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Nerve compression | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Presyncope | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Syncope | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 2 |
Transient ischaemic attack | 3/318 (0.9%) | 3 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Obstructive uropathy | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Renal artery stenosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Renal failure | 6/318 (1.9%) | 7 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Renal failure acute | 8/318 (2.5%) | 9 | 6/160 (3.8%) | 6 |
Renal impairment | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Urinary retention | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Rectocele | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute pulmonary oedema | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Acute respiratory failure | 1/318 (0.3%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 5/318 (1.6%) | 7 | 6/160 (3.8%) | 11 |
Epistaxis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Haemoptysis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Interstitial lung disease | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Lung infiltration | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Pleural effusion | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Pneumonia aspiration | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Pneumothorax | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pulmonary arterial hypertension | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pulmonary embolism | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Pulmonary fibrosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Pulmonary oedema | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory distress | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory failure | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Angioedema | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Bladder neoplasm surgery | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Heart transplant | 3/318 (0.9%) | 3 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Aortic aneurysm | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Aortic stenosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Arterial occlusive disease | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Arterial stenosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Deep vein thrombosis | 3/318 (0.9%) | 3 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Embolism | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Haematoma | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Hypertension | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Hypertensive crisis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Hypertensive emergency | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Hypotension | 3/318 (0.9%) | 3 | 2/160 (1.3%) | 2 |
Intermittent claudication | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Orthostatic hypotension | 4/318 (1.3%) | 4 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Peripheral vascular disorder | 2/318 (0.6%) | 2 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Thrombophlebitis superficial | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Thrombosis | 1/318 (0.3%) | 1 | 0/160 (0%) | 0 |
Vena cava thrombosis | 0/318 (0%) | 0 | 1/160 (0.6%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Adaptive CRT (aCRT) Pacing | Standard Biventricular Pacing | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 50/318 (15.7%) | 34/160 (21.3%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Atrial fibrillation | 10/318 (3.1%) | 10 | 14/160 (8.8%) | 15 |
Cardiac failure | 28/318 (8.8%) | 33 | 14/160 (8.8%) | 15 |
General disorders | ||||
Device stimulation issue | 14/318 (4.4%) | 17 | 10/160 (6.3%) | 14 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Generally, contracts allow investigators to publish study results per the protocol and publication plan. Investigators and Participating Institutions will provide any publication of Study Data generated by PI and/or Participating Institution to Medtronic for review prior to submission to determine if confidential information ("CI") is included and to check for technical correctness. Medtronic may not censor/interfere with the publication beyond the extent necessary to protect CI.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Adaptive CRT Clinical Research Specialist |
---|---|
Organization | Medtronic, Inc |
Phone | 800-328-2518 |
medtronicCRMtrials@medtronic.com |
- Adaptive CRT