High Intensity Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To determine the effect of high intensity aerobic interval training versus continuous aerobic training in heart failure patients.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: High Intensity interval Training
|
Other: High Intensity interval Training
High Intensity interval Training
Frequency: 3-5 day per week
Intensity: 60 to 80% of HRR. If atrial fibrillation present use RPE of 11-14 on a 6-20 scale.
Time: total 30 mint time.6 mint exercise with high intensity and 2 mints of low intensity for active recovery until 30 mints complete.
Type: walking and static cycling. Walking
Frequency 3 -5 days per week Intensity : use RPE of 11-14.
Time:30 mint total. 6 mint walk with high intensity and 2 mint walk with low intensity until 30mints completed.
|
| Active Comparator: Continuous Aerobic training
|
Other: Continuous Aerobic training
Continuous Aerobic training
Frequency : 3-5 days per week.
Intensity:40-70% of HHR.
Time : initial 5-10 then 10-15 until 30mints without rest interval
Type : walking and static cycling.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- 6MWT Distance [8 week]
Changes from the baseline, 6 min walk test was used to measure Functional capacity. It is a sub maximal exercise test which can aid in assessing functional capacity of patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, in this test we find out the maximum distance in meters which an individual covers in 6 min.
- Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire [8 week]
MLWHFQ is commonly used health related quality of life questionnaires with heart failure. This is very easy to apply on patients and self-administered questionnaire. It has two components emotional and physical and total score. Each item is scored in a 6.likert scale (0 to 5), thus, the total score could range from 5 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health related quality of life. Changes from the basline will be measured
- Pulse Rate [8 week]
Changes from baseline, Pulse rate was measured per minute through pulse oximeter
- Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) [8 week]
Changes from baseline SPO2 was measured in percentage. Oxygen immersion is the division of oxygen-soaked hemoglobin with respect to add up to hemoglobin in the blood. Pulse oximeter measure it.
- Modified Borg dyspnea scale [8 week]
Changes from the Baseline, It is a subjective numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no dyspnea" and 10 indicates "unbearable dyspnea." A number is chosen by the patient in order to decide the best score that matches his level of dyspnea during physical activity.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient with heart failure including both male and female
-
Patients who can perform 6 MWT.
-
According to classification of American heart association, class 1 heart failure patients are included.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Heart failure patients along with orthopedic problems.
-
Patients who have use pacemaker.
-
Patient who have recent acute myocardial infraction or revascularization less than 3 months.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poly clinic Hospital | Islamabad | Fedral | Pakistan | 44000 |
| 2 | Railway General Hospital | Rawalpindi | Punjab | Pakistan | 44000 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Riphah International University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Muhammad Iqbal Tariq, PhD*, Riphah International University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Hafiza Misbah Inayat