"Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Provider's Network Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to serve as a pilot showing the feasibility of a "Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure (HF) Provider's Network which will aim to provide improved, evidence-based care to Veterans with HF. Primary Care Providers in the VA Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) will undergo a brief period of intensive training in HF management and then practice in a network of primary care providers supported by the Regional HF Center.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Background:
Congestive heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem. There is a pressing need to improve treatment of HF, but lifesaving therapies remain underused in clinical practice. The investigators proposed a novel, potentially cost-effective model of community-based, multidisciplinary, collaborative HF care - the "Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Providers Network. Primary care providers trained in HF management would provide improved care to their clinic patients with HF in "satellite" clinics, supported by the Regional HF Center "hub".
Objectives:
-
To establish and demonstrate the feasibility of the "Hub and Satellite" Heart Failure Providers Network
-
To obtain data examining clinical effectiveness and barriers
Methods:
Volunteer community-based primary care providers underwent 3 days of HF management training at the regional HF center (Nashville), consisting of 21 hours of lectures, briefings, teaching sessions and case presentations. Multiple choice testing and a survey interview were completed at the beginning and end of training. Exclusive access was given to the services of a clinical pharmacist to titrate HF medications to clinical guideline-recommended doses.
Providers received updates on advances in HF management. A confidential feedback report on their performance was given to HF providers. Formative evaluation was performed through pre-educational and 4 subsequent telephone interviews with HF providers.
Decision Support System (DSS) data was used to identify patients with systolic HF (ejection fraction<40%) cared for by the HF providers; systolic HF patients in the same clinics cared for by non-HF trained providers were randomly selected as controls. Data on the care received over the one year period of follow-up was collected from DSS data and the computerized patient record system (CPRS).
Status:
One year of study follow-up has been completed. Primary data analysis is continuing. Work done to date has successfully demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a "Hub and Satellite" HF Providers network, including high provider satisfaction.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Arm 1: Received HF Training Providers will receive 3 days of HF training, receive access to clinical pharmacist medication titration serviced and receive performance feedback |
Other: HF training
These are CBOC Providers who received HF Training as the active intervention. HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds. Providers were given access to clinical pharmacist services Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration. There was quarterly analysis of patient compliance including individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures.
|
Active Comparator: Arm 2: No HF Training CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who did not received HF Training, access to clinical pharmacist services or performance feedback |
Other: No HF training
These are control providers drawn from the same CBOCs who have not received HF training, access to clinical pharmacist medication titration services or performance feedback
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Superior Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures [12 months]
This was a pilot, qualitative study to assess the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program to train primary care providers in specialty care. 9 Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures were studied: Patient weight measured at clinic visit; level of activity assessed; volume status assessed; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescribed; ACEI/ARB at target dose; beta-blocker prescribed; beta-blocker at target dose; evidence-based beta-blocker used; coumadin prescribed in atrial fibrillation. Healthcare provider performance with each of the Performance Outcome Quality Measures was assessed at each study visit. Superior performance was defined as a higher score for each Measure on the follow-up visit compared to the baseline visit. The primary outcome of the study was considered to have been reached if 6 of the 9 outcome measures were superior to the baseline visit.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Healthcare providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician's assistants) who practice in a Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) in the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, and are willing to undergo Heart Failure Training
Exclusion Criteria:
Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) Providers who are unable to attend the 3 day Heart Failure Training at the Regional Heart Failure Center.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37212-2637 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Development
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Henry H Ooi, MD, VA Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- RRP 09-170
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Primary care providers practicing were recruited from Primary Care Clinics in the local VA healthcare system. Providers volunteered to be trained as Heart Failure providers and underwent specialized training in May 2010. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | CBOC Providers who have received HF Training 3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds. Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures. | CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 6 | 6 |
COMPLETED | 6 | 6 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | CBOC Providers who have received HF Training 3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds. Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures. | CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 129 | 129 | 258 |
Age (years) [Mean (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Mean (Inter-Quartile Range) [years] |
65
|
65
|
65
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
4
3.1%
|
1
0.8%
|
5
1.9%
|
Male |
125
96.9%
|
128
99.2%
|
253
98.1%
|
Coronary Artery Disease (participants) [Number] | |||
Coronary Artery Disease present |
101
78.3%
|
97
75.2%
|
198
76.7%
|
Coronary artery disease not present |
28
21.7%
|
32
24.8%
|
60
23.3%
|
Hypertension (participants) [Number] | |||
Hypertension present |
119
92.2%
|
119
92.2%
|
238
92.2%
|
Hypertension not present |
10
7.8%
|
10
7.8%
|
20
7.8%
|
Diabetes (participants) [Number] | |||
Diabetes present |
72
55.8%
|
65
50.4%
|
137
53.1%
|
Diabetes not present |
57
44.2%
|
64
49.6%
|
121
46.9%
|
Median ejection fraction (% left ventricular end-diastolic volume) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | |||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [% left ventricular end-diastolic volume] |
30
|
30
|
30
|
Followed by Cardiology (participants) [Number] | |||
Number followed by Cardiology |
116
89.9%
|
108
83.7%
|
224
86.8%
|
Number not followed by Cardiology |
13
10.1%
|
21
16.3%
|
34
13.2%
|
Followed by Advanced Heart Failure Clinic (participants) [Number] | |||
Followed by Heart failure Clinic |
26
20.2%
|
37
28.7%
|
63
24.4%
|
Not followed by Heart Failure Clinic |
103
79.8%
|
92
71.3%
|
195
75.6%
|
HF Hospitalization past year (participants) [Number] | |||
No. with a HF hospitalization in the past year |
26
20.2%
|
15
11.6%
|
41
15.9%
|
No. without a HF hospitalization in the past year |
103
79.8%
|
114
88.4%
|
217
84.1%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Number of Superior Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures |
---|---|
Description | This was a pilot, qualitative study to assess the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a program to train primary care providers in specialty care. 9 Heart Failure Performance Outcome Quality Measures were studied: Patient weight measured at clinic visit; level of activity assessed; volume status assessed; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ACEI/ARB) prescribed; ACEI/ARB at target dose; beta-blocker prescribed; beta-blocker at target dose; evidence-based beta-blocker used; coumadin prescribed in atrial fibrillation. Healthcare provider performance with each of the Performance Outcome Quality Measures was assessed at each study visit. Superior performance was defined as a higher score for each Measure on the follow-up visit compared to the baseline visit. The primary outcome of the study was considered to have been reached if 6 of the 9 outcome measures were superior to the baseline visit. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
129 patients cared for by HF trained primary care providers in Intervention Arm. 129 patients in the Control group, cared for by non-HF trained primary care providers. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients followed by CBOC Providers who have received HF Training. | Patients followed by CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training |
Measure Participants | 129 | 129 |
Number [number of outcome measures superior] |
5
|
4
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Neither providers or patients were monitored for adverse events | |||
Arm/Group Title | Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training | ||
Arm/Group Description | CBOC Providers who have received HF Training 3 days of training in HF management: HF training includes didactic lectures, case discussions and interactive symposia, course materials including teaching material, textbooks, copies of HF clinical guidelines and patient education material for distribution, participation in HF Clinics and Inpatient Heart Failure Rounds. Access to clinical pharmacist services: Including medication and disease teaching, adjustment and uptitration Quarterly analysis of physician compliance: Individualized confidential, non-punitive feedback to providers from a set of prespecified core HF performance measures. | CBOC Providers in the same CBOC who have not received HF Training | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Arm 1: Received HF Training | Arm 2: No HF Training | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Henry Ooi |
---|---|
Organization | VA Medical Center Nashville |
Phone | 615-8736373 |
henry.ooi@va.gov |
- RRP 09-170