Prospective Comparison of Metolazone Versus Chlorothiazide for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance

Sponsor
University of Virginia (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT03574857
Collaborator
(none)
5
1
2
31
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to compare efficacy of metolazone and chlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients refractory to loop diuretics with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This will be a single-center randomized pilot study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Metolazone Oral Tablet
  • Drug: Chlorothiazide Injection
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
5 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective Comparison of Metolazone Versus Chlorothiazide for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Metolazone

Metolazone 5 mg by mouth once daily for 2 days

Drug: Metolazone Oral Tablet
Day 1: Metolazone 5 mg PO Day 2: Metolazone 5 mg PO
Other Names:
  • Zaroxolyn
  • Active Comparator: Chlorothiazide

    Chlorothiazide 500 mg IV once daily for 2 days

    Drug: Chlorothiazide Injection
    Day 1: Chlorothiazide 500 mg IV Day 2: Chlorothiazide 500 mg IV
    Other Names:
  • Diuril
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Net urine output at 24 hours [24 hours]

      Milliliters of urine output minus the oral plus intravenous intake

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Net urine output at 48 hours [48 hours]

      Milliliters of urine output minus the oral plus IV intake

    2. Net fluid balance over 12 hours [24 hours]

      the net fluid balance over 12 and 24 hours prior to the addition of metolazone or chlorothiazide compared to the 12 hours after addition of the study drug

    3. Net fluid balance over 24 hours [48 hours]

      Net fluid balance over 24 hours prior to the addition of metolazone or chlorothiazide compared to the 24 hours after addition of the study drug

    4. Weight change [48 hours]

      Change in documented weight in kg at 48 hours after starting metolazone or chlorothiazide

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Electrolyte disturbances [48 hours]

      Frequency of hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia

    2. Worsening renal function [48 hours]

      increase in serum creatinine greater that 0.5 mg/dL from the patient's baseline value on the day of the first dose of chlorothiazide or metolazone

    3. Hospital length of stay [Assessed until hospital discharge, an average of 7 days]

      Number of days hospitalized

    4. ICU length of stay [Assessed until hospital discharge, an average of 7 days]

      Number of days patient is located in an ICU

    5. In-hospital mortality [Assessed until hospital discharge, an average of 7 days]

      Incidence of in-hospital mortality

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age > 18 years old

    • Admitted for acute decompensated HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%

    • Refractory fluid overload:

    • Unresponsive (<500 mL net negative over previous 24 hours) AND ineffective diuresis (determined by HF team) to moderate intensity push or low intensity continuous infusion loop diuretic (80 mg IV furosemide or equivalent bumetanide dose of 4 mg)

    • English or Spanish-speaking subjects

    • Willing and able to comply with study procedures

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Baseline thiazide use prior to admission or prior to study enrollment

    • Renal replacement therapies (RRT) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min at the time of enrollment

    • Pregnant women

    • Cognitive impairment

    • Prisoners

    • Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) or temporary mechanical circulatory support devices

    • History of cardiac transplant

    • Reported allergy to thiazides

    • No enteral access or unable to take medications enterally

    • Palliative diuretics

    • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mm Hg prior to randomization

    • Patients receiving concomitant lithium therapy

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Virginia

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Emily Burns, Principle Investigator, University of Virginia
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03574857
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20455
    First Posted:
    Jul 2, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 16, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Emily Burns, Principle Investigator, University of Virginia
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 16, 2021