Efficacy of a Mechanical Gait Repetitive Training Technique in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients (AVC)

Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00284115
Collaborator
Ministry of Health, France (Other)
122
12
2
62
10.2
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Modern concepts of gait rehabilitation after stroke favor a task-specific repetitive approach. This study aims to test the efficacy on gait recovery of a mechanized gait trainer enabling nonambulatory patients to have the repetitive practice of a gait-like movement.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Gait trainer
  • Device: Conventional rehabilitation
N/A

Detailed Description

Modern concepts of gait rehabilitation after stroke favor a task-specific repetitive approach. The aim of the study is to test the efficacy of a body weight support treadmill training technique enabling nonambulatory patients to have the repetitive practice of a gait-like movement compared to a conventional rehabilitation program in the acute phase. Hemiparetic stroke patients will be randomly included in a 4 week rehabilitation program associating physiotherapy and gait trainer therapy or physiotherapy alone.

The primary endpoint will be the walking speed (time needed to walk 10 m) at the end of the rehabilitation program. Functional ambulatory category, walking endurance, time to self sufficient gait recovery, needing for mobility and self assistance, spasticity and economic evaluation of the two strategies will also be assessed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
122 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of a Mechanical Gait Repetitive Training Technique Compared With a Usual Rehabilitation Program on Gait Recovery in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Mechanical gait repetitive training

Body weight support treadmill training technique enabling nonambulatory patients to have the repetitive practice of a gate-like movement

Device: Gait trainer
Mechanical gait repetitive training

Active Comparator: Conventional rehabilitation program

Physiotherapeutic conventional rehabilitation program

Device: Conventional rehabilitation
Physiotherapeutic conventional rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Walking speed (time needed to walk 10 m) after the 4 week rehabilitation program [after 4 weeks]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Functional ambulatory category [Days 0, 15, 28 and 90.]

  2. Walking endurance (6 minute walk) [days 15, 28 and 90.]

    distance covered in a 6 minutes confortable walk

  3. Time to self sufficient gait recovery [Since inclusion Time]

  4. Spasticity (modified Ashworth score) [Days 0, 15, 28 and 90]

  5. Motricity index [Days 0, 15, 28 and 90]

  6. Need for mobility and self assistance (Barthel score, PMSI-SSR scores, need for physical assistance) [Days 0, 15, 28 and 90]

  7. Economic evaluation (healthcare requirements, rehabilitation unit length of stay) [At the end of the study]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Men or women aged 18 years or more

  • Hemiplegia secondary to stroke

  • Interval between stroke and study inclusion of 4 month or less

  • First supratentorial stroke or no motor sequelae in case of history of transient ischemic stroke

  • Non ambulatory patient (Functional Ambulatory Category Stage 0 or 1)

  • Being able to sit unsupported at the edge of the bed

  • No severe impairment of cognition or communication

  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Orthopedic and/or rheumatological disease impairing mobility

  • Other Neurological associated disease

  • History of myocardial infarction or deep venous embolism or pulmonary embolism less than 3 months before study inclusion

  • Chronic pulmonary disease

  • Intolerance to stand up

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rééducation et Réadaptation Fonctionnelle - Hôpital Intercommunal Robert Ballanger Aulnay sous Bois France 93602
2 Centre du Docteur Bouffart-Vercelli Cerbère France 66290
3 Centre de Rééducation de Coubert Coubert France 77170
4 Rééducation Fonctionnelle - Hôpital Raymond Poincaré Garches France 92380
5 Centre l'espoir Hellemmes France 59260
6 Centre Bretegnier Héricourt France 70400
7 Département de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation - Hôpital Jean Rebeyrol Limoges France 87000
8 Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation - Hôpital de l'Archet Nice France 06202
9 Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation - Centre Hospitalier Le Grau du Roi Nîmes France 30029
10 Service de Rééducation Neuro-orthopédique - Hôpital Rothschild Paris France 75012
11 Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation - Hôpital Pontchaillou Rennes France 35033
12 Centre de l'Arche Saint Saturnin France 72650

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rennes University Hospital
  • Ministry of Health, France

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Régine Brissot, MD, CHU Rennes
  • Study Chair: Bruno Laviolle, MD, CHU Rennes

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Rennes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00284115
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AFSSAPS 2005/10/006
  • PHRC/04-02
First Posted:
Jan 31, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Jul 4, 2012
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2012
Keywords provided by Rennes University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 4, 2012