Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients (Aim 3)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
We will directly test the hypothesis that an initial strategy of lisinopril-based therapy will be more effective than atenolol-based therapy in causing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) over one year in patients with hemodialysis hypertension despite similar degree of BP reduction.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
This is a parallel group, active control, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of initial therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) vs. beta-blocker therapy (atenolol) each administered three times weekly after dialysis.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1 Atenolol |
Drug: Atenolol
Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg.
|
Experimental: 2 Lisinopril |
Drug: Lisinopril
Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year. [Baseline, 6 months, 12 months]
The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. A mixed model was used with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as the outcome variable. Fixed effects were indicator variables for time, treatment and their interaction. Random effect was subject and statistical inference was made using the maximum likelihood estimator. No imputation was made for missing data.
Other Outcome Measures
- Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination [1 yr]
Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF), hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. Adverse events reported are those during the course of 12 months of participation in the trial. All serious adverse events were adjudicated by R.A. and A.D.S. who were masked to the drug assignment at the time of adjudication. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. The cardiovascular event rate was calculated by treatment group assignment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). As a post hoc analysis, we also determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included MI, stroke, CHF, or cardiovascular death.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients on chronic hemodialysis for > 3 mos.
-
Compliance with hemodialysis treatments as defined by less than one missed dialysis per month
-
Hypertension as diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) >135/75 mm Hg after participation in the ultrafiltration (UF) Trial, or those on no antihypertensive medications but unwilling to do UF Trial.
-
Presence of LVH on echocardiogram defined as left ventricular mass index (LVMi) >104 g/m2 in women and >116 g/m2 in men.
-
Willingness to give informed consent.
Exclusion criteria:
-
Vascular event (stroke, myocardial infarction or limb ischemia requiring bypass) within previous six months
-
Noncompliance with hemodialysis treatments
-
Known drug abuse
-
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) requiring home oxygen
-
Congestive Heart Failure Class III or IV.
-
Body mass index > 40 kg/m2.
-
Known contraindication to atenolol (severe heart failure, bradycardia, bronchial asthma, intolerance or allergy) or lisinopril (cough, pregnancy, intolerance or allergy)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Indiana University
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rajiv Agarwal, MD, Indiana University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 0306-13
- R01DK062030
- NIH-NIDDK-5RO1-062030
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Atenolol | Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Atenolol: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | Lisinopril: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 100 | 100 |
COMPLETED | 58 | 46 |
NOT COMPLETED | 42 | 54 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Atenolol | Lisinopril | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Atenolol: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | Lisinopril: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 100 | 100 | 200 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
52.5
(11.7)
|
53.1
(13.5)
|
52.7
(12.6)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
27
27%
|
42
42%
|
69
34.5%
|
Male |
73
73%
|
58
58%
|
131
65.5%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
1
1%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
99
99%
|
100
100%
|
199
99.5%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||
Blacks |
86
86%
|
86
86%
|
172
86%
|
Non-blacks |
14
14%
|
14
14%
|
28
14%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
100
100%
|
100
100%
|
200
100%
|
Etiology of chronic kidney disease (participants) [Number] | |||
Diabetes mellitus |
29
29%
|
27
27%
|
56
28%
|
Hypertension |
54
54%
|
46
46%
|
100
50%
|
Glomerulonephritis |
4
4%
|
5
5%
|
9
4.5%
|
Polycystic kidney disease |
0
0%
|
1
1%
|
1
0.5%
|
Other etiologies |
13
13%
|
21
21%
|
34
17%
|
Dialysis vintage (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
4.2
(4.4)
|
3.9
(4.2)
|
4.1
(4.3)
|
Anuric (participants) [Number] | |||
Number [participants] |
68
68%
|
66
66%
|
134
67%
|
Education (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
12
(2)
|
12
(2)
|
12
(2)
|
Comorbid conditions (participants) [Number] | |||
Diabetes mellitus |
43
43%
|
43
43%
|
86
43%
|
Hospitalized heart failure |
25
25%
|
37
37%
|
62
31%
|
Coronary artery disease |
22
22%
|
31
31%
|
53
26.5%
|
Coronary revascularization |
4
4%
|
15
15%
|
19
9.5%
|
Cerebrovascular disease |
13
13%
|
20
20%
|
33
16.5%
|
Peripheral vascular disease |
10
10%
|
11
11%
|
21
10.5%
|
Marital status (participants) [Number] | |||
Single |
53
53%
|
56
56%
|
109
54.5%
|
Married |
23
23%
|
19
19%
|
42
21%
|
Divorced/separated |
18
18%
|
15
15%
|
33
16.5%
|
Widowed |
6
6%
|
10
10%
|
16
8%
|
Employed (participants) [Number] | |||
Working |
11
11%
|
7
7%
|
18
9%
|
Not working |
67
67%
|
70
70%
|
137
68.5%
|
Retired |
22
22%
|
23
23%
|
45
22.5%
|
Income (participants) [Number] | |||
< $25,000 |
84
84%
|
80
80%
|
164
82%
|
>= $25,000 |
10
10%
|
7
7%
|
17
8.5%
|
Refused |
6
6%
|
13
13%
|
19
9.5%
|
Smoking (participants) [Number] | |||
Current smoker |
43
43%
|
43
43%
|
86
43%
|
Non-smoker |
57
57%
|
57
57%
|
114
57%
|
Alcohol (participants) [Number] | |||
Drinks alcohol |
27
27%
|
19
19%
|
46
23%
|
Does not drink alcohol |
73
73%
|
81
81%
|
154
77%
|
Height (inches) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [inches] |
68.3
(4.1)
|
67.6
(3.7)
|
67.9
(3.9)
|
Weight (kg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg] |
85.1
(21.7)
|
80.9
(24.3)
|
83
(23.1)
|
Body mass index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
28.4
(7)
|
27.5
(8.3)
|
27.9
(7.7)
|
Access type (participants) [Number] | |||
Fistula |
59
59%
|
59
59%
|
118
59%
|
Graft |
16
16%
|
14
14%
|
30
15%
|
Catheter |
25
25%
|
27
27%
|
52
26%
|
Blood flow rate (mL/min) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mL/min] |
394.3
(30.9)
|
392.4
(36.4)
|
393.4
(33.7)
|
Dialysate flow rate (mL/min) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mL/min] |
779.6
(61.9)
|
761.3
(82)
|
770.4
(73)
|
Dialysis duration (minutes) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Prescribed dialysis duration |
239.4
(19)
|
239.4
(25.9)
|
239.4
(22.7)
|
Delivered dialysis duration |
224.1
(34.7)
|
219.8
(33.7)
|
222
(34.2)
|
Urea reduction ratio (%) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [%] |
74
(8)
|
76
(8)
|
75
(8)
|
Albumin (g/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [g/dL] |
3.6
(0.5)
|
3.6
(0.5)
|
3.6
(0.5)
|
Hemoglobin (g/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [g/dL] |
11.3
(1.2)
|
11.3
(1.4)
|
11.3
(1.3)
|
Creatinine (mg/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL] |
10.3
(3.5)
|
10
(3.6)
|
10.1
(3.6)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | The Primary End Point is the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) by Echocardiographic Criteria From Baseline to 1 Year. |
---|---|
Description | The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. A mixed model was used with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as the outcome variable. Fixed effects were indicator variables for time, treatment and their interaction. Random effect was subject and statistical inference was made using the maximum likelihood estimator. No imputation was made for missing data. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary outcome of the study was the average reduction in left ventricular mass indexed for body surface area from baseline to 1 year. The analysis was performed by intention to treat, if the patient received at least one dose of the randomized drug regardless of the availability of a post-baseline echocardiogram. |
Arm/Group Title | Atenolol | Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Atenolol: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | Lisinopril: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. |
Measure Participants | 100 | 100 |
LVMI Change from baseline, 6 months |
-8.4
(5.1)
|
-3.4
(5.5)
|
LVMI Change from baseline, 12 months |
-21.5
(5.7)
|
-15.1
(6.2)
|
Title | Serious Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Events That Led to Trial Termination |
---|---|
Description | Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF), hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. Adverse events reported are those during the course of 12 months of participation in the trial. All serious adverse events were adjudicated by R.A. and A.D.S. who were masked to the drug assignment at the time of adjudication. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. The cardiovascular event rate was calculated by treatment group assignment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). As a post hoc analysis, we also determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included MI, stroke, CHF, or cardiovascular death. |
Time Frame | 1 yr |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Atenolol | Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Atenolol: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | Lisinopril: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. |
Measure Participants | 100 | 100 |
Incidence rate, cardiovasular events |
24.6
|
58
|
Incidence rate, combined MI, stroke, CHF, CV death |
13.5
|
31
|
Incidence rate, congest heart failure |
6.2
|
20.2
|
Incidence rate, all-cause hospitalizations |
89.9
|
144.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Atenolol, Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Comments | Cardiovascular events were counted by subject and included the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, hospitalized angina, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization and heart valve replacement. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals (95% CIs). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 2.36 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.36 to 4.23 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Atenolol, Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Comments | As a post hoc analysis, we determined the narrower definition of cardiovascular events per group that included myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure or cardiovascular death. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals (95% CIs). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 2.29 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.07 to 5.21 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Atenolol, Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Comments | Hospitalization for congestive heart failure between groups was analyzed. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 3.13 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.08 to 10.99 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Atenolol, Lisinopril |
---|---|---|
Comments | All-cause hospitalizations between groups were analyzed. The duration of participation in the study per subject, which according to the trial design could be up to 12 months, was determined. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) by treatment was then determined along with the 95%confidence intervals. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.002 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.61 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.18 to 2.19 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Atenolol | Lisinopril | ||
Arm/Group Description | Atenolol: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | Lisinopril: Patients will be randomized into two groups, one that is beta blocker based, the other ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) based. Patients who are on no medications will receive atenolol 25 mg. t.i.w. or lisinopril 10 mg. t.i.w. for one month at the end of which, dose will be titrated to twice the drug doses following monthly interval to another doubling of dose. If BP is still poorly controlled felodipine will be added. Other antihypertensive therapies will be added to control home BP to <140/90 mm Hg. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Atenolol | Lisinopril | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Atenolol | Lisinopril | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 58/100 (58%) | 70/100 (70%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Angina | 0/100 (0%) | 0 | 2/100 (2%) | 2 |
Arrhythmia | 2/100 (2%) | 2 | 3/100 (3%) | 5 |
Cardiac arrest | 0/100 (0%) | 0 | 2/100 (2%) | 2 |
Congestive heart failure | 5/100 (5%) | 5 | 10/100 (10%) | 15 |
Myocardial infarction | 2/100 (2%) | 2 | 3/100 (3%) | 3 |
Peripheral vascular disease | 1/100 (1%) | 1 | 5/100 (5%) | 6 |
Revascularization | 3/100 (3%) | 4 | 4/100 (4%) | 4 |
Stroke | 2/100 (2%) | 2 | 2/100 (2%) | 2 |
Valve replacement surgery | 1/100 (1%) | 1 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Cardiovascular death | 2/100 (2%) | 2 | 3/100 (3%) | 3 |
Endocrine disorders | ||||
Parathyroidectomy | 3/100 (3%) | 3 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Hyperglycemia | 1/100 (1%) | 2 | 3/100 (3%) | 3 |
Hypoglycemia | 2/100 (2%) | 3 | 4/100 (4%) | 4 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Bowel-related | 3/100 (3%) | 3 | 5/100 (5%) | 5 |
Gastrointestinal bleed | 2/100 (2%) | 4 | 5/100 (5%) | 7 |
General disorders | ||||
Noncardiovascular death | 2/100 (2%) | 2 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Falls | 6/100 (6%) | 6 | 3/100 (3%) | 3 |
Hypertensive crisis | 3/100 (3%) | 3 | 10/100 (10%) | 11 |
Hypotension with hospitalization | 6/100 (6%) | 8 | 5/100 (5%) | 5 |
Miscellaneous | 12/100 (12%) | 14 | 18/100 (18%) | 24 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Biliary-related | 1/100 (1%) | 1 | 2/100 (2%) | 2 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Infections | 24/100 (24%) | 30 | 20/100 (20%) | 29 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Fractures | 7/100 (7%) | 7 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Cancer-related complications | 2/100 (2%) | 4 | 2/100 (2%) | 3 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Central nervous system | 3/100 (3%) | 3 | 3/100 (3%) | 5 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Access-related | 17/100 (17%) | 24 | 19/100 (19%) | 30 |
Hyperkalemia | 3/100 (3%) | 3 | 10/100 (10%) | 10 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Atenolol | Lisinopril | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 44/100 (44%) | 29/100 (29%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | 5/100 (5%) | 6 | 6/100 (6%) | 6 |
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 20/100 (20%) | 25 | 6/100 (6%) | 12 |
bradycardia | 2/100 (2%) | 3 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Intradialytic hypotension | 6/100 (6%) | 7 | 4/100 (4%) | 4 |
tachycardia | 1/100 (1%) | 1 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Dialysis access-related events | 0/100 (0%) | 0 | 1/100 (1%) | 1 |
Hypertension | 1/100 (1%) | 1 | 2/100 (2%) | 3 |
Other | 19/100 (19%) | 23 | 17/100 (17%) | 29 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Upper respiratory infection | 1/100 (1%) | 1 | 2/100 (2%) | 4 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Rash | 1/100 (1%) | 2 | 2/100 (2%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Rajiv Agarwal |
---|---|
Organization | Professor of Medicine |
Phone | 317-988-2241 |
ragarwal@iu.edu |
- 0306-13
- R01DK062030
- NIH-NIDDK-5RO1-062030