Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation Plus Conventional Resuscitation

Sponsor
University of Louisville (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT01882218
Collaborator
(none)
0
2
2
19.9
0
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) (putting a sugar solution into the abdominal cavity) helps blood flow through vital organs in the body that may suffer from low blood flow due to surgery. We will also try to find out if the DPR will help patients recover faster from liver surgery. Lastly, this study will also try to find if direct peritoneal resuscitation decreases levels of signaling chemicals in the blood called 'cytokines' and a protein called high-mobility group protein 1, which is known to cause tissue damage.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Our study will focus on 108 patients requiring hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastasis or primary hepatocellular carcinoma. These patients will then be randomized into two 54 patient arms: the control arm of conventional resuscitation only and the experimental arm of conventional resuscitation with DPR immediately post operatively. Patient exclusion criteria will be: 1) unable to obtain proper consent for enrollment, 2) age less than 18 years or greater than 75 years, 3) chronic renal failure, cirrhosis, or congestive heart failure, 4) patients requiring portal venous embolization prior to resection, or 5) women who are pregnant or lactating/breast feeding. A pregnancy test (urine or blood) will be done for female subjects of child bearing potential the day prior or the morning of surgery per the usual standard of care pre-op labs.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Comparison of Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation Plus Conventional Resuscitation Versus Conventional Resuscitation Alone in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection for Cancer
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard treatment

Standard liver surgery and post-operative treatment

Drug: Standard Treatment
Standard liver surgery.

Experimental: Galactose

Standard liver surgery with direct peritoneal resuscitation with galactose after surgery.

Drug: Galactose
After surgery, galactose will be dripped into the belly for up to 24 hours after surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Morbidity [Six months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Cytokine levels [Six months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Colorectal cancer

  • Scheduled for liver resection

  • 18 to 75

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Chronic renal failure

  • Cirrhosis

  • Congestive heart failure

  • Requiring portal venous embolization prior to resection

  • Pregnant or nursing

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Norton Hospital Louisville Kentucky United States 40202
2 University of Louisville Hospital Louisville Kentucky United States 40202

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Louisville

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jason Smith, MD, U Louisville

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jason Smith, MD, University of Louisville
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01882218
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 12.0262
First Posted:
Jun 20, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2017
Last Verified:
May 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jason Smith, MD, University of Louisville
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 5, 2017