Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy

Sponsor
AdventHealth (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03307811
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
1
14
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a prospective study to determine the optimal technique for obtaining liver tissue with a smaller caliber (22 gauge) needle and whether a good core biopsy can be obtained without the use of suction and secondly to determine the diagnostic yield and safety of 22 g Fine Needle Biopsy needle for liver biopsy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: 22 gauge needle liver biopsy
N/A

Detailed Description

Liver biopsy (LB) has historically been performed by percutaneous route without image guidance (blind biopsy). However, in the last several years there has been more reliance on image guidance ultrasound-guided (USG) or computed tomography (CT) to direct the needle into the liver with the hope of limiting complications. Other ways of performing liver biopsy are transjugular fluoroscopy guided approach when percutaneous route is deemed not safe because of coagulopathy or ascites. Surgical LB (either laparoscopic or open) is yet another way of obtaining liver tissue.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is proposed as a newer method that may offer several potential advantages over existing techniques for attaining liver tissue. It can be performed in an outpatient setting and offers the comfort of sedation and analgesia. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) provides high resolution images of left lobe of the liver and a good portion of the right lobe of the liver. This coupled with Doppler capability the biopsy needle can be safely directed into the liver for sampling under real time image guidance. Intervening structures such as pleura, bowel loops and gallbladder can be easily seen by EUS and thus avoided that further decreases the risk of adverse events. It has been recognized that sampling error can lead to diagnostic inaccuracy of a biopsy from a single site. As compared to USG or CT scan the EUS allows easy and safe biopsy of both left and right lobes of the liver during same setting, potentially addressing concerns about sampling error.

The cost of the endoscopic procedure is the main expense of EUS-LB. Thus this approach is best used for patients requiring EUS for evaluation of elevated liver tests. If no obstructive lesion is identified by EUS that will require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) then it would cost-effective to perform EUS-LB during the same setting without much additional time and risks. This approach can spare the patient the additional discomfort and expense of a second dedicated LB procedure by any of the other available techniques (percutaneous, transjugular etc.). In such setting the equipment costs for the EUS-LB will mainly include only the Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) needle, which is similar in expense to the cost of needles for the transjugular or percutaneous approach.

The traditionally used transcutaneous LB needle is 16 gauge (G) while largest EUS biopsy needle is 19 G. The smaller size of the needle is expected to decrease the complications rate (mainly pain and bleeding) even further. Many studies using a 19 G Tru-cut biopsy or Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) needle to acquire liver tissue have obtained specimens adequate for histologic diagnosis but there has been a wide range of specimen adequacy (19-100%). The 19 G Tru-cut biopsy needle has been associated with several technical difficulties that could reflect negatively on tissue adequacy.

While it is easy and straight forward to biopsy the left lobe of the liver with any EUS needle. The 19 G needle is a large bore needle for EUS use and it is sometimes difficult to attain an adequate position for biopsy specially in duodenum where scope is torqued and this is the only area of access to right lobe.

In this study the investigators will use a 22 G needle. Smaller caliber of the needle would not only make it technically easier to access right lobe of the liver through the duodenum, it is also expected to decrease the risks further due to smaller size. Also, the 22 G EUS-FNB needle has three cutting points at the cutting edge of the needle that provide stability at puncture while the high quality, fully formed heels are designed to maximize tissue capture and minimize fragmentation, that would result in attaining a good histological specimen, a main stay for liver biopsy.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy Using a 22 Gauge Fine Needle Biopsy Needle.
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 19, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 22 gauge needle liver biopsy

EUS-LB will be performed using a 22 g FNB needle. Specimens obtained from each pass will be placed in a separate biopsy jar. If the third pass does not result in sufficient diagnostic material, a 19 G will be used. A maximum of 3 passes will be made using the alternate needle. The total number of passes with the 22 G needle and the 19 G needle is 6. Data will be collected about the procedure and the performance of the needles for each procedure.

Other: 22 gauge needle liver biopsy
EUS will be performed. Specimens obtained from each pass will be placed in a separate biopsy jar. If the third pass does not result in sufficient diagnostic material, a 19 G will be used. A maximum of 3 passes will be made using the alternate needle. The total number of passes with the 22 G needle and the 19 G needle is 6. Data will be collected about the procedure and the performance of the needles for each procedure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Diagnostic adequacy of the liver biopsy specimen [Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.]

    Determine the diagnostic adequacy of the liver biopsy specimen by obtaining a histological specimen using a smaller (22 G) caliber needle. Diagnostic adequacy is defined as a sample that provides definitive pathological diagnosis (yes, no).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Visible core [Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.]

    The sample will have a visible core (yes/no).

  2. Suction [Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.]

    Sample was obtained using suction (yes/no).

  3. Number of passes required histological samples [Time of Liver biopsy]

    Assessing the median number of passes required to obtain diagnostically adequate histological samples histological samples

  4. Technical failure [Time of Liver biopsy]

    Was there a technical failure (yes/no).

  5. Complications/Bleeding [1 month]

    Assessing subjects for post-procedural complications via follow up phone calls. Bleeding (yes/no).

  6. Complications/Pain [1 month]

    Assessing subjects for post-procedural complications via follow up phone calls. Pain (yes/no).

  7. Complications/Infection [1 Month]

    Assessing subjects for post-procedural complications via follow up phone calls. Infection (yes/no).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. All patients referred to Florida Hospital Endoscopy Unit for assessment of elevated liver tests with EUS and are found to have no obstructive lesion to explain elevation of liver tests and will not require ERCP.

  2. Age ≥ 19 years

  3. Willing to provide informed consent verbal or written.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Age <19 years

  2. Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason

  3. Coagulopathy (INR >1.6, Thrombocytopenia with platelet count <50,000/ml) for subjects on anti-coagulation therapy.

  4. Unwilling or cognitively unable to provide informed consent verbal or written.

  5. Pregnancy (confirmed with Standard of Care urine pregnancy test for all women with child-bearing potential only)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Center for Interventional Endoscopy - Florida Hospital Orlando Florida United States 32803

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • AdventHealth

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Hasan, MD, Florida Hospital - Center for Interventional Endoscopy

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
AdventHealth
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03307811
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1055744
First Posted:
Oct 12, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Feb 11, 2019
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by AdventHealth
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 11, 2019