CLIN-ECHO-II: Efficacy of the echOpen Device to Detect Pyelocaliceal Dilation and Hepatic Steatosis

Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05280145
Collaborator
ECHOPEN (Other), EIT Health (Other)
200
3
1
8.9
66.7
7.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In recent years, portable and ultra-portable ultrasound devices are increasingly used by the non radiologists, notably cardiologists or obstetrician gynecologist, at the patient's bedside to visualize and measure anatomical structures and fluid and provide the clinical examination with additional signs allowing quicker and more confident clinical decisions.

This innovative approach is slowed down by the accessibility of these miniaturized devices, the price of which remains high.

The echOpen device includes an ultra-portable ultrasound probe and a mobile application that allows the image to be displayed on a smartphone via a WIFI protocol.

The objective of the clinical investigation is to show that the echOpen device, using three frequencies 3.5 Mhz, 5.0 Mhz and 7.5 Mhz, allows identifying the semiological signs or anatomical structures of interest located at several depths of the body, with a performance similar to other devices routinely used in clinical departments.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: EchOpen ultra-portable ultrasound device
  • Device: Ultrasound device routinely used in the department
  • Procedure: Standard ultrasound examination by an independent referent radiologist
N/A

Detailed Description

The echOpen device includes an ultrasound probe and a mobile application. The mechanical probe emits at three ultrasound frequencies, 3.5 Mhz, 5.0 Mhz and 7.5 Mhz, which allows the exploration of the interior of the body at different depths in a non-invasive and non-irradiating manner.

Thus, the purpose of the echOpen device is, on one hand, to guide the diagnosis during the clinical examination and, on the other hand, to identify anatomical structures in order to assist in management.

The objective of the clinical investigation is to demonstrate that the echOpen device is able to identify semiological signs and localize anatomical structures at different depths of the body, with a performance not inferior to that of other ultrasound devices, routinely employed in hospital clinical departments.

The signs of interest (i.e. detection of pyelocaliceal dilation (3.5 Mhz) and hepatic steatosis (5.0 Mhz) were chosen for their clinical usefulness (their identification during the clinical examination constitutes an argument for orientation and/or severity) and for their prevalence in the study population.

An ultrasound probe in use in the hospital clinical departments where the investigation takes place will be employed as a comparator to judge the performance of the echOpen device.

This clinical investigation is part of a CE marking procedure.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A single group, comparative, non-randomized, controlled study. Each patient represents her/his own control: the patient is examined consecutively with the echOpen probe, then with the probe routinely used in the departmentA single group, comparative, non-randomized, controlled study. Each patient represents her/his own control: the patient is examined consecutively with the echOpen probe, then with the probe routinely used in the department
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Screening
Official Title:
Assessment of the echOpen Ultra-portable Ultrasound Device in Daily Use by Clinicians. Part II: Detection of Pyelocaliceal Dilation and Hepatic Steatosis
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 4, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Patients benefitting ultrasound examination

This is the only arm of the study. Patients with an indicative clinical picture that leads the clinician to resort to the use of an ultrasound to potentially support the diagnosis will be examined to verify the presence of pleural effusion or intra-abdominal effusion, or to identify basilic vein. The patients will be assessed first with the echOpen device and second witn an ultrasound routinely used in the department. In a case of discordance between the assessments made with echOpen and the usual ultrasound device, an independent referent radiologist will use a standard ultrasound machine to constitute the gold standard (GS) rating.

Device: EchOpen ultra-portable ultrasound device
Depending on the clinical picture, the patient is examined with EchOpen to detect the presence or absence of pyelocaliceal dilation or hepatic steatosis

Device: Ultrasound device routinely used in the department
Patient who was first examined with EchOpen, is secondarily examined with an ultrasound probe used routinely in the department to detect pyelocaliceal dilation or hepatic steatosis

Procedure: Standard ultrasound examination by an independent referent radiologist
In a case of discordance between the assessments made with echOpen and the usual ultrasound device, an independent referent radiologist will use a standard ultrasound machine to constitute the gold standard (GS) rating.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Presence of Pyelocaliceal dilation [Day 0]

    Pyelocaliceal system assessment by using echOpen or a portable ultrasound routinely used in the department and scored as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, normal parenchyma, dilated renal pelvis, undilated calyces; 2, normal parenchyma, renal pelvis and calyces dilated, papillary impression preserved; 3, parenchyma thinned, significant pyelocaliceal dilation with bulging calyxes and disappearance of the papillary impression; 4, very thinned parenchyma, massive pyelocaliceal dilation, disappearance of the pyelocaliceal differentiation.

  2. Presence of Hepatic steatosis [Day 0]

    Hepatic steatosis assessment by using echOpen or a portable ultrasound routinely used in the department and scored on the base of liver echogenicity as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, local hyperechogenicity; 2, diffuse hyperechogenicity

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pyelocaliceal dilation determined using a gold standard procedure [Day 0]

    Pyelocaliceal system assessment by by an independent referent radiologist using a standard ultrasound machine and scored as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, normal parenchyma, dilated renal pelvis, undilated calyces; 2, normal parenchyma, renal pelvis and calyces dilated, papillary impression preserved; 3, parenchyma thinned, significant pyelocaliceal dilation with bulging calyxes and disappearance of the papillary impression; 4, very thinned parenchyma, massive pyelocaliceal dilation, disappearance of the pyelocaliceal differentiation.

  2. Hepatic steatosis determined using a gold standard procedure [Day 0]

    Hepatic steatosis assessment by by an independent referent radiologist using a standard ultrasound machine and scored on the base of liver echogenicity as follows: 0, normal condition; 1, local hyperechogenicity; 2, diffuse hyperechogenicity

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patient (age ≥ 18 years old)

  • Patient having signed the informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation

  • Patient affiliated to the social security scheme

  • Patient arriving in the hospital clinical ward (own initiative or by emergency services) whose clinical symptomatology suggests the presence of pathological elements which would be visible using an ultrasound probe in the following cases:

  • Search for pyelocaliceal dilation: patient consulting for abdominal and/or lumbar pain and/or iliac fossa, fever, pain in the right or left iliac fossa, anuresis

  • Search for hepatic steatosis: in a case of global clinical examination, abnormal laboratory test results, known or suspected metabolic disease, any situation suggesting the presence of hepatic steatosis

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Minor patient (age < 18 years)

  • Patients under the State Medical Assistance (AME)

  • Obese patient (body mass index > 29.9)

  • Patient in too serious condition for the clinical examination to be done fully and/or with additional exploratory time

  • Unstable patient: need for immediate care, impossibility to carry out a thorough clinical examination including interview, palpation, auscultation, percussion

  • Known allergy to ultrasound gel

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Avicenne Hospital - APHP- Hepatology Department Bobigny France 93140
2 APHP COCHIN HOSPITAL / Emergency Department Paris France 75014
3 Paul Brousse Hospital - APHP - Hepatobiliary Center Villejuif France 94800

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • ECHOPEN
  • EIT Health

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jérôme BOKOBZA, MD, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05280145
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • APHP211147
  • 2021-A02168-33
First Posted:
Mar 15, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 26, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 26, 2022