Liver: Prospective Tumor Response Evaluation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if MRI imaging can detect genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic characteristics of liver tumors. The study also aims to determine if these imaging characteristics are correlated with clinical outcomes.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
For each treatment arm, pre-procedural MRI and post procedural MRI will be obtained. Pre-procedural biopsies will be obtained, if possible. Pretreatment genetic expression, proteomic, or metabolomic patterns from the tumor samples will be assessed. Imaging characteristics from tumors will be extracted using automated software-the study will apply a computational analysis system with the capability to extract and analyze imaging characteristics and correlate them to genetic expression, proteomic, and metabolomic tumor characteristics. Imaging findings will be correlated to clinical outcomes and genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic findings to determine association. Imaging findings and genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic tumor characteristics will be correlated to clinical outcomes (time to recurrence, overall survival, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year survival).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Transcatheter Chemoembolization or TACE A technique called transcatheter chemoembolization (TACE) is used for some patients with liver cancer that cannot be treated surgically. The procedure is a way of delivering cancer treatment directly to a tumor through minimally-invasive means. |
Procedure: TACE
Procedure for giving chemotherapy directly to tumor cells.
Other Names:
|
Yittrium 90 or Y-90 Radioembolization is a minimally invasive procedure that combines embolization and radiation therapy to treat liver cancer. Tiny glass or resin beads filled with the radioactive isotope yttrium Y-90 are placed inside the blood vessels that feed a tumor. This blocks the supply of blood to the cancer cells and delivers a high dose of radiation to the tumor while sparing normal tissue. |
Procedure: Y-90
Using a combination of radiation and chemotherapy directly on the tumor cells to cause cell death.
Other Names:
|
Microwave Ablation or MWA Microwave ablation (MWA), destroys liver tumors using heat generated by microwave energy. A CT scan or ultrasonic guidance is used to pinpoint the exact location of the tumor. A thin antenna, which emits microwaves, is then inserted into the tumor. The probe produces intense heat that ablates (destroys) tumor tissue, often within 10 minutes. |
Procedure: MWA
Using heat to kill tumor cells.
Other Names:
|
electroporation Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal method of destroying the cell. A cell is subjected to a powerful electrical field using high-voltage direct current (up to 3 kV); this creates multiple holes in the cell membrane and irreversibly damages the cell's homeostasis mechanism, leading to instant cell death. |
Procedure: IRE
Using energy to disrupt tumor cell activity, thereby causing cellular death.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Time to progression [1 month to 3 years]
Time from initial treatment to progression as defined by RECIST criteria.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- 1 year survival [1 year]
Number of patients alive 1 year after treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis or suspicion of primary or metastatic liver cancer deemed eligible for TACE, Y-90, percutaneous ablation, and /or electroporation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any reason MRI cannot be obtained.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Texas Health Science Center Houston | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Derek L West, MD, University of Texas Healtlh Science Center at Houston
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Assumpcao L, Choti M, Pawlik TM, Gecshwind JF, Kamel IR. Functional MR imaging as a new paradigm for image guidance. Abdom Imaging. 2009 Nov;34(6):675-85. doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9481-8. Epub 2008 Dec 2. Review.
- Bian DJ, Xiao EH, Hu DX, Chen XY, Situ WJ, Yuan SW, Sun JL, Yang LP. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy on hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Chin J Cancer. 2010 Feb;29(2):198-201.
- Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1245-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0. Epub 2012 Feb 20. Review.
- Gu L, Liu H, Fan L, Lv Y, Cui Z, Luo Y, Liu Y, Li G, Li C, Ma J. Treatment outcomes of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with local ablative therapy versus monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;140(2):199-210. Review.
- Karlo CA, Di Paolo PL, Chaim J, Hakimi AA, Ostrovnaya I, Russo P, Hricak H, Motzer R, Hsieh JJ, Akin O. Radiogenomics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: associations between CT imaging features and mutations. Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):464-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130663. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
- Minami Y, Kudo M. Therapeutic response assessment of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: ultrasonography, CT and MR imaging. Oncology. 2013;84 Suppl 1:58-63. doi: 10.1159/000345891. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Review.
- Raoul JL, Gilabert M, Piana G. How to define transarterial chemoembolization failure or refractoriness: a European perspective. Liver Cancer. 2014 May;3(2):119-24. doi: 10.1159/000343867. Review.
- HSC-MS-14-0761