Role of DEB-TACE Versus c-TACE in Treatment of HCC

Sponsor
Sohag University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05093920
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
12.9
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is listed as the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality. The majority of HCC cases occurs stem from chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma accounts for approximately 70% to 90% of all primary liver cancers. Trans-arterial Chemoembolization is the most widely utilized and is considered the first-line treatment recommended for patients staged as intermediate HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B). If applied correctly, TACE can produce survival benefits without adversely affecting hepatic functional reserve.

Two TACE techniques have been used since 2004, conventional TACE (c-TACE) and TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE). Conventional TACE was evidenced first to treat intermediate stage HCC patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads
Early Phase 1

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is listed as the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the third most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality. The majority of HCC cases occurs stem from chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma accounts for approximately 70% to 90% of all primary liver cancers. HCC patients have been suffering from poor prognosis with 5-year survival being roughly 10% to 15% for decades despite the progress in screening, diagnosis, and treatment, which is mainly resulted from that most patients are already in the moderate or advanced stage at diagnosis, whom can only receive palliative treatments.

At the level of the individual patient, concomitant cirrhosis and the number, size, and location of hepatocellular tumors will affect the treatment approach. In addition, multiple disease-related factors need to be taken into account, such as the presence of vascular involvement or extra-hepatic disease, when deciding on the best treatment options for these patients. Consequently, a multidisciplinary approach involving several physicians with different specialties (e.g., diagnostic and interventional radiologists, surgical oncologists, hepatologists, and medical oncologists) is necessary to determine the best approach to treatment and maximize potential outcomes for patients with HCC.

The liver has a dual vascular supply via the hepatic artery and the portal vein. The rationale of the trans-arterial embolotherapies is explained by the fact that liver malignancies are predominantly supplied by the hepatic artery, which allows delivering the chemotherapy directly to the tumor-feeding artery while sparing the healthy hepatic tissue mainly supplied by the portal vein.

Loco regional treatments are a set of therapeutic approaches that directly target tumors in the liver. Among the loco regional modalities, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) involves the local delivery of chemotherapy to the tumor and is generally recommended for patients with liver-limited disease. Several randomized trials have been conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of TACE.

According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, TACE is the first-line treatment for patients with intermediate stage HCC, including those with large or multinodular HCC, well-preserved liver function, and no cancer-related symptoms or evidence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. Recent advances allow TACE treatment of both early stage patients (i.e. those with a solitary nodule or up to 3 nodules under 3 cm) and some advanced stage patients.

Trans-arterial Chemoembolization is the most widely utilized and is considered the first-line treatment recommended for patients staged as intermediate HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B). If applied correctly, TACE can produce survival benefits without adversely affecting hepatic functional reserve.

Two TACE techniques have been used since 2004, conventional TACE (c-TACE) and TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE). Conventional TACE was evidenced first to treat intermediate stage HCC patients. It combines the trans-catheter delivery of chemotherapy using Lipiodol-based emulsion plus an embolizing agent to achieve strong cytotoxic and ischemic effects. Drug-eluting beads (DEB) were developed in order to slowly release chemotherapeutic agents, and to increase ischemia intensity and duration.

The introduction of TACE with drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) was primarily developed to enhance the delivery of the chemotherapeutic agent while minimizing systemic toxicity and to provide a standardized embolizing effect. DEBs are embolic microspheres loaded with a chemotherapeutic agent (mostly doxorubicin) with the ability of slow drug release, which should ensure high local and low systemic drug concentrations. Indeed, systemic levels of doxorubicin were significantly lower in patients receiving DEB-TACE compared to patients receiving c-TACE with Lipiodol.

DEB-TACE was introduced 10 years ago with the aim to improve the overall c-TACE outcomes and to diminish the side effects of the procedure. It is based on the use of microspheres that exploit ionic bonds and are able to actively sequester and then slowly release the cytotoxic drug inside the target lesion. Moreover, the use of particles allows a deeper distal embolization of small vessels, ensuring a permanent highly selective occlusion of the tumor-feeding arteries.

DEB-TACE has several advantages over c-TACE, such as the delivery of higher concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents directly to tumors, lower rates of systemic complications, greater efficacy in advanced stage or large tumors, and better standardization of the procedure itself.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Role of Drug Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoebolization Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Drug Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization

Drug Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization

Drug: Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads
The patients will be categorized in two randomized groups; c-TACE group (A) and DEB-TACE group (B). After patient counseling and obtaining a written consent to participate in the study, both groups will be subjected to the interventional procedure according to patient group; Group A; Lipidol-Doxorubicin emulsion material followed by gel foam embolic material will be injected through the catheter directly into tumor feeding vessels through transarterial catheter. Group B; Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads will be injected through the catheter directly into tumor feeding vessels through transarterial catheter.
Other Names:
  • Lipidol-Doxorubicin emulsion
  • Active Comparator: conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization

    conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization

    Drug: Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads
    The patients will be categorized in two randomized groups; c-TACE group (A) and DEB-TACE group (B). After patient counseling and obtaining a written consent to participate in the study, both groups will be subjected to the interventional procedure according to patient group; Group A; Lipidol-Doxorubicin emulsion material followed by gel foam embolic material will be injected through the catheter directly into tumor feeding vessels through transarterial catheter. Group B; Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads will be injected through the catheter directly into tumor feeding vessels through transarterial catheter.
    Other Names:
  • Lipidol-Doxorubicin emulsion
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Tumor size [four-six weeks after treatment]

      Triphasic CT scan of the liver measures the maximum diameter of tumor according to modified RECIST (mRecist) criteria.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Serum Alpha-fetoprotein level ng/ml. [four-six weeks after treatment]

      Laboratory test of Serum alpha-fetoprotein level (AFP) ng/ml.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
      • Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis.
    • ECOG performance status (PS) Grade 2 or below.

    • BCLC stage B or C.

    • No serious concurrent medical illness.

    • Radiologically or histologically proven HCC (an alpha-fetoprotein level > 500 ug/ml in the presence of radiological findings suggestive of HCC in a patient with chronic HBV or HCV infection is considered eligible).

    • Unresectable and locally advanced disease without extra-hepatic disease.

    • Nodular tumor morphology with measurable lesion on CT with less than 50% involvement of liver by HCC.

    • Size of largest tumor is less than or equal to 15cm in largest dimension.

    • Number of main tumor is less than or equal to 5, excluding associated small satellite lesions.

    • Patent main portal vein.

    Exclusion Criteria:
      • Child-Pugh C cirrhosis (evidence of poor liver function).
    • History of significant concurrent medical illness such as ischemic heart disease or heart failure.

    • Serum creatinine level > 2 mg/dL.

    • Presence of extrahepatic metastasis.

    • Predominantly infiltrative lesion.

    • Diffuse tumor morphology with extensive lesions involving both lobes.

    • Hepatic artery thrombosis.

    • Thrombosis of the main portal vein.

    • Tumor invasion of portal branch of contralateral lobe.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Sohag University Hospital Sohag Egypt 88525

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Sohag University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ahmed E Mohamed, Master, Sohag University
    • Study Chair: Mohamed Z Ali, MD, Sohag University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Ahmed Elsaman Mohamed, Assistant Lecturer at department of diagnostic and interventional radiology, Sohag University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05093920
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Soh-Med-21-10-31
    First Posted:
    Oct 26, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    May 11, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 11, 2022