SIRveNIB: Study to Compare Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Sponsor
Singapore General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01135056
Collaborator
National Cancer Centre, Singapore (Other), National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore (Other), Singapore Clinical Research Institute (Other), Sirtex Medical (Industry)
360
29
2
97
12.4
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of SIRT as compared with Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced liver cancer in terms of overall survival (OS).

The Study null hypothesis is, there is no difference in overall survival between patients receiving SIRT and those receiving Sorafenib therapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: SIR-Spheres
  • Drug: Sorafenib tosylate
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 5th most common cancer worldwide but unfortunately between 70 - 80% of all HCC are in the Asia-Pacific because of the prevalence of chronic viral hepatitis in the region. The increase in the prevalence of chronic hepatitis C in the Western world however predicts that HCC will similarly be an important cause of death there in the next 20 years.

Only 15-20% of HCC are today potentially curable by surgery at the time of diagnosis. Another 10-15% of patients may benefit from potentially curative locally ablative therapy such as radio-frequency ablation. Prognosis in the majority of patients has been dismal as conventional systemic therapies have been largely inefficacious. The first successfully trialed systemic targeted therapy, sorafenib (2007) prolonged survival by a modest average of 3 months in patients with good underlying liver function.

While the liver is radio-sensitive, external beam radiation causes significant radio-toxicity. To overcome this, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) was developed to deliver a radiation source directly to liver cancer via the arterial route. Sir-sphere is radioactive yttrium on a 90 micro-meter diameter resin carrier and is an established therapy in colorectal metastasis. Sir-sphere has been reported to cause significantly tumour regression in HCC.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of SIRT using SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 microspheres compared to sorafenib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary HCC.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
360 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Phase III Multi-Centre Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SIRveNIB)
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2010
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Sorafenib, Multikinase Inhibitor, Tablet

Sorafenib tosylate: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that decreases tumor cell proliferation. Sorafenib was shown to inhibit multiple intracellular (c-CRAF, BRAF and mutant BRAF) and cell surface kinases (KIT, FLT- 3, RET, VEGFR-1, VEGFR- 2, VEGFR- 3, and PDGFR- ß). Several of these kinases are thought to be involved in tumor cell signaling, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Sorafenib inhibited tumor growth of the human hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma, and several other human tumor xenografts in immunocompromised mice. A reduction in tumor angiogenesis and increases in tumor apoptosis was seen in models of human hepatocellular and renal cell carcinoma. Additionally a reduction in tumor cell signaling was seen in a model of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Drug: Sorafenib tosylate
Oral Tablet, 400mg B.i.d, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops
Other Names:
  • Nexavar
  • Active Comparator: SIR-Spheres, Microspheres, Device

    SIR-Spheres: SIR-Spheres consist of biocompatible resin microspheres containing yttrium-90, with a size between 20 and 60 microns in diameter. Yttrium-90 is a high-energy pure beta-emitting isotope with no primary gamma emission. The half life of yttrium-90 is 64.1 hours. In clinical use which requires the isotope to decay to infinity, 94% of the radiation is delivered in 11 days leaving only background radiation with no therapeutic value. SIR-Spheres is implanted into hepatic tumours by delivery via either the common hepatic artery or the right or left hepatic artery using a catheter or implanted port . Once SIR-Spheres is implanted into the liver, it is not metabolised or excreted and it stays permanently in the liver.

    Device: SIR-Spheres
    One time treatment. Dose administered based on tumour volume. Each vial is 3.0GBq.
    Other Names:
  • Yttrium-90 Microspheres
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall Survival [2 years]

      Overall Survival is defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of death due to any cause. All patients will be followed up until death to compare the overall survival between the two treatments. 2 years is an estimated time frame.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Progression free survival in the liver [2 years]

      Progression-free survival in the liver is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the date of tumour progression in the liver or death, whichever is earlier. Tumour progression in the liver will be determined from serial CT scans. Diagnosis of tumour progression of disease should be made using the RECIST guideline version 1.1. 2 years is an estimated time frame.

    2. Progression free survival overall [2 years]

      Progression-free survival overall is defined as the time interval between randomisation and the date of tumour progression at any site in the body or death, whichever is earlier. Tumour progression at any site in the body will be measured by any definitive imaging technique including CT scan, MRI study or other nuclear medicine scan. The Investigator should clearly indicate the site of tumour progression (hepatic or extra-hepatic) at the time of recurrence. 2 years is an estimated time frame.

    3. Tumour Response Rate [2 years]

      Tumour response and progression will be evaluated in this study using the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [European Journal of Cancer (45): 228 - 247, 2009] (http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/recist_guideline.pdf). 2 years is an estimated time frame

    4. Toxicity and Safety [Up to 2 years]

      Toxicity will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 4.02. Patients for both treatment arms will be followed-up for safety and toxicity from the time of study entry (randomisation day) until 30 days post study conclusion or until commencement of the next alternative therapy, which ever is earlier.

    5. Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) [Up to 2 years]

      Quality of life (QoL) will be measured by using the EQ-5D questionnaire over the study period. QoL for patients will be measured until their first disease progression up to 2 years (estimated) which ever is earlier.

    6. Liver resection rate [Up to 2 years]

      Patients will be assessed for suitability for liver resection every 12 weekly until their study conclusion up to 2 years which ever is earlier.

    7. Liver Transplantation Rate [Up to 2 years]

      Patients will be assessed for suitability for liver transplantation every 12 weekly until their study conclusion up to 2 years which ever is earlier.

    8. Time to Disease Progression [Up to 2 years]

      Time to Disease Progression (TTP) is defined as a measure of time after a disease is diagnosed (or treated) until the disease starts to get worse. Disease Progression will be measured by RECIST guideline version 1.1. TTP will be measured every 12 weekly up to 2 years (estimated).

    9. Disease control rate [2 years]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Disease must be locally advanced as defined by BCLC (B) intermediate stage or BCLC (C) advanced stage without extra-hepatic disease (only with branch portal vein thrombosis).

    • Willing, able and mentally competent to provide written informed consent prior to any testing undertaken for this study protocol, including screening tests and evaluations that are not considered to be part of the subject's routine care.

    • Aged 18 years/older (either gender).

    • Unequivocal diagnosis of HCC.

    • HCC not amenable to surgical resection or immediate liver transplantation, or cannot be optimally treated with local ablative techniques such as RFA, consistent with the practice of the clinical trial centre.

    • Measurable disease, defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥ 10 mm with spiral CT scan or MRI.

    • ECOG performance status 0-1.

    • Child-Pugh A-B (up to 7 points)

    • Adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function as follows:

    • Leukocytes ≥ 2,500/μL

    • Platelets ≥ 80,000/μL

    • Haemoglobin > 9.5g/dL

    • Total bilirubin < 2.0mg/dL

    • INR ≤ 2.0

    • ALP ≤ 5 x institutional ULN

    • AST and ALT ≤ 5 x institutional ULN

    • Albumin ≥ 2.5g/dL

    • Creatinine ≤ 2.0mg/dL

    • Life expectancy of at least 3 months without any active treatment.

    • Suitable for protocol treatment as determined by clinical assessment undertaken by the Investigator.

    • Female patients must be either postmenopausal or, if premenopausal, must have a negative pregnancy test and agree to use 2 forms of contraception if sexually active during their study participation.

    • Male patients must be surgically sterile, or if sexually active and having a pre-menopausal female partner then must be using an acceptable form of contraception.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Have had more than 2 administrations of hepatic artery directed therapy.

    • Subjects who have had hepatic artery directed therapy done < 4 weeks prior to study entry.

    • Have had systemic chemotherapy for HCC except for prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy given more than 6 months from enrolment.

    • have had prior treatment with Sorafenib or VEGF inhibitors.

    • Prior hepatic radiation therapy for HCC or other malignancy.

    • Currently receiving any other investigational agents for the treatment of their cancer.

    • Has intractable clinical ascites (in spite of optimal diuretic treatment) or any other clinical signs of liver failure, on physical examination.

    • Complete main portal vein thrombosis.

    • Any metastatic disease (local-regional lymph nodes measuring less than 2 cm in greatest diameter or lung nodules measuring less than 1 cm are not contraindications as per Investigator discretion).

    • Any other concurrent malignancy, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for at least 5 years.

    • Presence of clinical signs of CNS metastases due to their poor prognosis and because progressive neurologic dysfunction would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events.

    • Uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection (except viral hepatitis), symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.

    • Any of the following contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization:

    • Bleeding diathesis, not correctable by the standard forms of therapy.

    • Severe peripheral vascular disease that would preclude arterial catheterization.

    • Portal hypertension with hepato-fugal flow as documented on baseline spiral CT scan.

    • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to SIR-Spheres or Sorafenib.

    • Inability or unwillingness to understand or sign a written informed consent document.

    • Female subjects who are pregnant or currently breastfeeding.

    • Female subjects, unless postmenopausal or surgically sterile, unwillingness to practice effective contraception, as per Investigator discretion during the study. The rhythm method is not to be used as the sole method of contraception.

    • Male subjects, unwillingness to practice effective contraception (per Investigator discretion) while taking part in this study, because the effect of the SIR-Spheres treatment on sperm or upon the development of an unborn child are unknown.

    • Current enrolment in any other investigational therapeutic drug or device study.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 The Brunei Cancer Centre Jerudong Brunei Brunei Darussalam 3122
    2 Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong China
    3 University of Udayana, Rumah Sakit Sanglah, Indonesia Denpasar Bali Indonesia 80114
    4 Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital ,University of Indonesia Jakarta Indonesia 16424
    5 Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of 120-752
    6 Korea University Anam Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of 136-705
    7 Seoul St. Mary's Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of 137- 040
    8 Asan Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of 138-736
    9 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul Korea, Republic of 463-707
    10 Sarawak General Hospital Kuching Sarawak Malaysia
    11 University Malaya Medical Center Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
    12 Penang Adventist Hospital Penang Malaysia 10350
    13 National Cancer Center of Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia 210648
    14 Yangon GI & Liver Centre Yangon Myanmar 11141
    15 Auckland City Hospital Grafton Auckland New Zealand 1023
    16 Makati Medical Center Manila Makati City Philippines 1229
    17 The Medical City Pasig City Manila Philippines
    18 St. Luke's Medical Center, Philippines Quezon City Manila Philippines 1102
    19 Davao Doctors Hospital Davao Philippines
    20 National University Hospital Singapore Singapore 119075
    21 Singapore General Hospital Singapore Singapore 168608
    22 National Cancer Center Singapore Singapore Singapore 169610
    23 Khoo Teck Puat Hospital Singapore Singapore 768828
    24 National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei City Taipei Taiwan 100
    25 Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei City Taipei Taiwan 112
    26 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan Taoyuan Hsien Taiwan
    27 Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan 833
    28 China Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan 404
    29 Chulabhorn Hospital Bangkok Thailand 10210

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Singapore General Hospital
    • National Cancer Centre, Singapore
    • National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore
    • Singapore Clinical Research Institute
    • Sirtex Medical

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Pierce KH Chow, MBBS, PhD, National Cancer Centre, Singapore

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Singapore General Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01135056
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AHCC06
    First Posted:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 24, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by Singapore General Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 24, 2018