The Impact of Sugammadex on Ileus After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05985343
Collaborator
(none)
184
1
2
12
15.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to determine if the usage of sugammadex would reduce the time to return of bowel function when compared to standard of care (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate) when used for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients with open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

The investigators baseline postoperative ileus (POI) rate in the setting of open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is similar to patients undergoing an open bowel resection and often prolongs patients' hospital stay. Therefore, the investigators aim to determine whether the use of sugammadex has a clinically significant impact on return of postoperative bowel function and prevention of POI in these patients.

The primary outcome is GI-2: postoperative time until passage of 1st bowel movement and tolerance of solid food.

The investigators hypothesize:
  • postoperative time to return of bowel function (GI-2) after open AWR will be significantly shorter for patients who receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade when compared to those receiving standard of care (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate).

  • patients who receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade will have a reduced incidence of POI requiring nasogastric tube (NG) placement, and decreased length of hospital stay when compared to standard of care.

Specific Aim 1: To determine if the use of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal reduces the time to postoperative GI-2 bowel function compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Specific Aim 2: To determine if sugammadex reduces the incidence of postoperative NG placement compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Specific Aim 3: To determine if sugammadex reduces postoperative length of stay following AWR compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
184 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be assigned to receive sugammadex or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular blockadePatients will be assigned to receive sugammadex or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular blockade
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
The patient will be blinded as to what medication they receive for reversal of neuromuscular blockade
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
The Impact of Sugammadex on Ileus After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate

Patients assigned to the control arm receive the standardized reversal neostigmine dose with on-label dosing (0.03-0.07mg/kg) and a fixed ratio of glycopyrrolate

Drug: Neostigmine / Glycopyrrolate
Patients will receive standard of care for reversal of neuromuscular blockade
Other Names:
  • Control arm
  • Other: Sugammadex

    Patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive an IV dose of sugammadex according to the package insert of 2 mg/kg for ≥ 2 twitches, 4 mg/kg for 1-2 post-tetanic twitches

    Drug: Sugammadex
    Patients will receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade
    Other Names:
  • Experimental arm
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Time to GI-2 bowel function after surgery [From time of randomization to progression of bowel function, which is an average of 87 hours, or until 1 month after randomization; whichever comes first]

      The median time to first postoperative bowel movement and tolerance of solid food (defined as GastroIntestinal-2), as measured in hours, will be recorded for each patient and compared between the two groups.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Length of stay [From time of randomization to progression allowing safe discharge home, which is an average of 6 days, or until 1 month after randomization; whichever comes first]

      Duration of hospital stay as measured in hours from end of surgery to placement of discharge order will be

    2. Postoperative nasogastric tube placement rate [Up to 1 month after randomization]

      Placement of nasogastric tube for nausea/vomiting after surgery will be recorded and compared between the two groups.

    3. Postoperative complications [Up to 1 month after randomization]

      All postoperative complications will be recorded and compared between the two groups

    4. Postoperative pain [Postop day 1, 2, 3, and 4]

      Postop pain will be assessed using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) where patients will report their pain on a 0-10 scale, where higher scores mean worse pain. Overall scores will be compared between the two groups.

    5. Opioid used in morphine milligram equivalents [Postop day 1, 2, 3, and 4]

      Total postoperative opioid use will be recorded after converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared between the two groups.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adults >18 years old

    • Patients requiring an open ventral hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement and at least one myofascial advancement flap

    • Hernias with fascial defects < 20cm wide

    • Non-emergent cases

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known serious or severe hypersensitivity reaction to sugammadex or any of the ingredients in sugammadex.

    • Hernias with fascial defects > 20cm wide

    • Concomitant treatment with a strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor (e.g., Ketoconazole and other anti-fungals, Clarithromycin, HIV protease inhibitors, diltiazem, erythromycin, verapamil) or strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., rifampin).

    • Known small bowel obstruction (SBO) at the time of hernia repair

    • Suspected SBO or at risk of recurrent SBO at the time of hernia repair - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.

    • Nasogastric (NG), orogastric (OG), or gastric (eg. PEG) in place at the time of hernia repair and left in beyond the morning of the first postoperative day.

    • Patients with a stoma.

    • Cancer with increased risk of gastro-duodenal perforation (e.g., infiltrative gastrointestinal tract malignancy, recent gastrointestinal tract surgery, diverticular disease including diverticulitis, ischemic colitis, or concomitantly treated with bevacizumab) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.

    • Disorder that could alter the integrity of the gastrointestinal lining (e.g., Crohn's disease) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.

    • Severe hepatic failure (Child-Pugh Class C).

    • Clinically relevant hepatic failure (e.g. cirrhosis) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.

    • Severe renal failure (GFR<30ml/min, on dialysis, or have an arteriovenous fistula, indwelling hemodialysis catheter or peritoneal dialysis catheter) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.

    • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study period.

    • Breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed during study period.

    • Clinically relevant alteration of the blood-brain-barrier - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.

    • Other contraindication to sugammadex as documented by a physician.

    • Unable to give informed consent; vulnerable populations; non-English speaking.

    • Emergent operation.

    • Undergoing minimally invasive approaches.

    • Undergoing repair with mesh placed in a position other than retromuscular.

    • Chronic opioid users, as defined by the daily use of opioids for at least 90 days within the past year

    • Inability to safely extubate the patient at the end of the surgery for any reason, as determined by the operative team.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health Cleveland Ohio United States 44195

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • The Cleveland Clinic

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Clayton C Petro, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Clayton Petro, Assistant Professor of Surgery Lerner College of Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05985343
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 23-700
    First Posted:
    Aug 14, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 14, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 14, 2023