An Exploratory Study to Investigate the Inflammatory Response During a Cold Sore Episode
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will treat approximately 24 participants who experience cold sores. Patches will be applied to the cold sore for up to ten days, and the symptoms will be measured during daily clinic visits using non-invasive measurement techniques.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 1 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Test patch Patch containing acyclovir applied to cold sore |
Device: Acyclovir patch
Patch containing acyclovir
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo patch Patch without acyclovir applied to cold sore |
Device: Placebo patch
Patch without acyclovir
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Flow [Baseline to Day 10]
Measurement of blood flow was performed using Field Laser Perfusion Imaging (FLPI) technique. Total episode value (TEV) was calculated as the summation of (test region response minus control region response) across all days. Maximum episode value (MEV) was calculated as the maximum of (test region response minus control region response) across all days.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Temperature [Baseline to Day 10]
Lesion thermographic parameters for TEV and MEV were analysed.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Color Intensity of Lesions [Baseline to Day 10]
The redness of the cold sores to be measured and quantified using sophisticated, standardized and reproducible color photography. Parameter represents distance between test and control values according to a* axis and b* axis colour intensity values. The values on the scale ranged from -100 (green, lowest intensity) to +100 (red, highest intensity).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Participant Assessment of Patch Comfort and Noticeability at Day 5 [Day 5]
Participants reported experience of the patch aesthetics and cold sore noticeability on the cold sore using a 5-point scale ( 1=Strongly Disagree 2=Rather Disagree 3=Neither Agree nor Disagree 4=Mostly Agree 5=Completely Agree) on 9 questions asked to them: Today my sore felt completely protected Today my cold sores interfered with facial movements such as smiling, eating or drinking Today my cold sores interfered with my interaction with other people Today the patch disguised my cold sores Today I was bothered by the appearance of my cold sores Today my patch was easy to apply Today the patch covering my cold sores was bothersome Today the patches stayed in place on my cold sores until I removed them Today the patches were easy to remove from my lip or skin
- Participant Assessment of Patch Comfort and Noticeability at Day 10 [Day 10]
Participants reported experience of the patch aesthetics and cold sore noticeability on the cold sore using a 5-point scale ( 1=Strongly Disagree 2=Rather Disagree 3=Neither Agree nor Disagree 4=Mostly Agree 5=Completely Agree) on 9 questions asked to them: Today my sore felt completely protected Today my cold sores interfered with facial movements such as smiling, eating or drinking Today my cold sores interfered with my interaction with other people Today the patch disguised my cold sores Today I was bothered by the appearance of my cold sores Today my patch was easy to apply Today the patch covering my cold sores was bothersome Today the patches stayed in place on my cold sores until I removed them Today the patches were easy to remove from my lip or skin
- Participant Assessment of Symptom Intensity at Day 5 [Day 5]
Cold sore symptoms (pain, burning, itching) assessment was evaluated on a 5-point scale: 1=Never Bothered, 2=Rarely Bothered, 3=Bothered Some of the Time, 4=Bothered Often, 5=Bothered All the Time.
- Participant Assessment of Symptom Intensity at Day 10 [Day 10]
Cold sore symptoms (pain, burning, itching) assessment was performed on a 5-point scale: 1=Never Bothered 2=Rarely Bothered 3=Bothered Some of the Time 4=Bothered Often 5=Bothered All the Time.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Participants who are susceptible to cold sores that reactivate when exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | proDERM Institute for Applied Dermatological Research GmbH | Hamburg | Germany | 22869 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Labtec GmbH
Investigators
- Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- E7411153
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited at the clinical site. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 105 screened, 60 underwent ultraviolet (UV) rays induction, 25 developed a cold sore and were randomized into the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 12 | 13 |
COMPLETED | 12 | 13 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. Baseline measures were determined for Safety population. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. Baseline measures were determined for Safety population. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 12 | 13 | 25 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
47.6
(14.88)
|
43.2
(15.60)
|
45.3
(15.11)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
11
91.7%
|
12
92.3%
|
23
92%
|
Male |
1
8.3%
|
1
7.7%
|
2
8%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Flow |
---|---|
Description | Measurement of blood flow was performed using Field Laser Perfusion Imaging (FLPI) technique. Total episode value (TEV) was calculated as the summation of (test region response minus control region response) across all days. Maximum episode value (MEV) was calculated as the maximum of (test region response minus control region response) across all days. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Day 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent to Treat (ITT) population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and have at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
TEV (Day 1 to Day 10) |
2558.65
(627.87)
|
3470.13
(603.23)
|
MEV |
809.88
(127.93)
|
960.86
(122.91)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Acyclovir Patch, Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered no difference between study treatments for TEV. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3061 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA model with a factor for treatment group. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least square mean difference |
Estimated Value | -911.48 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -2712.65 to 889.69 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference calculated as first named treatment minus second named treatment, such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Acyclovir Patch, Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered no difference between treatments for MEV. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.4035 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA model with a factor for treatment group. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -150.99 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -517.97 to 215.99 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference calculated as first named treatment minus second named treatment, such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment. |
Title | Mean Change From Baseline in Temperature |
---|---|
Description | Lesion thermographic parameters for TEV and MEV were analysed. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Day 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and have at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
TEV (Day 1 to Day 10) |
3.24
(0.86)
|
0.76
(0.82)
|
MEV |
0.90
(0.15)
|
0.51
(0.15)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Acyclovir Patch, Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered no difference between study treatments for TEV (Day 1 to day 10). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0486 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA model with a factor for treatment group. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 2.48 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.02 to 4.93 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference calculated as first named treatment minus second named treatment, such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Acyclovir Patch, Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered no difference between study treatments for MEV. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0799 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA model with a factor for treatment group. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.38 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.05 to 0.82 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference calculated as first named treatment minus second named treatment, such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment. |
Title | Mean Change From Baseline in Color Intensity of Lesions |
---|---|
Description | The redness of the cold sores to be measured and quantified using sophisticated, standardized and reproducible color photography. Parameter represents distance between test and control values according to a* axis and b* axis colour intensity values. The values on the scale ranged from -100 (green, lowest intensity) to +100 (red, highest intensity). |
Time Frame | Baseline to Day 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and have at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
TEV |
11.05
(1.12)
|
8.91
(1.07)
|
MEV |
2.66
(0.22)
|
2.29
(0.21)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Acyclovir Patch, Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered no difference between study treatments for TEV. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1790 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA model with a factor for treatment group. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS mean difference |
Estimated Value | 2.14 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.06 to 5.35 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference calculated as first named treatment minus second named treatment, such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Acyclovir Patch, Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered no difference between study treatments for MEV. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.2446 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ANOVA model with a factor for treatment group. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS mean difference |
Estimated Value | 0.37 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.27 to 1.00 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference calculated as first named treatment minus second named treatment, such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment. |
Title | Participant Assessment of Patch Comfort and Noticeability at Day 5 |
---|---|
Description | Participants reported experience of the patch aesthetics and cold sore noticeability on the cold sore using a 5-point scale ( 1=Strongly Disagree 2=Rather Disagree 3=Neither Agree nor Disagree 4=Mostly Agree 5=Completely Agree) on 9 questions asked to them: Today my sore felt completely protected Today my cold sores interfered with facial movements such as smiling, eating or drinking Today my cold sores interfered with my interaction with other people Today the patch disguised my cold sores Today I was bothered by the appearance of my cold sores Today my patch was easy to apply Today the patch covering my cold sores was bothersome Today the patches stayed in place on my cold sores until I removed them Today the patches were easy to remove from my lip or skin |
Time Frame | Day 5 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and had at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. There were difference in number of participants analyzed for each end point as represented by "n". |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
Protection (n = 11, 12) |
4.45
(0.69)
|
4.17
(1.12)
|
Facial Movements (n = 11, 12) |
2.18
(1.33)
|
2.75
(1.60)
|
Interpersonal Interaction (n = 11, 12) |
2.09
(1.45)
|
1.75
(0.97)
|
Cold Sore Cover (n = 11, 12) |
4.45
(0.93)
|
3.92
(1.31)
|
Cold sore appearance (n = 11, 12) |
1.55
(0.93)
|
1.67
(1.16)
|
Ease of application (n = 11, 12) |
4.55
(0.69)
|
4.00
(1.04)
|
Bothersomeness (n = 11, 12) |
1.55
(0.93)
|
1.55
(0.45)
|
Adhesivenes (n = 11, 12) |
4.36
(0.92)
|
3.75
(0.97)
|
Patch removal (n = 9, 10) |
4.33
(1.00)
|
4.60
(0.52)
|
Title | Participant Assessment of Patch Comfort and Noticeability at Day 10 |
---|---|
Description | Participants reported experience of the patch aesthetics and cold sore noticeability on the cold sore using a 5-point scale ( 1=Strongly Disagree 2=Rather Disagree 3=Neither Agree nor Disagree 4=Mostly Agree 5=Completely Agree) on 9 questions asked to them: Today my sore felt completely protected Today my cold sores interfered with facial movements such as smiling, eating or drinking Today my cold sores interfered with my interaction with other people Today the patch disguised my cold sores Today I was bothered by the appearance of my cold sores Today my patch was easy to apply Today the patch covering my cold sores was bothersome Today the patches stayed in place on my cold sores until I removed them Today the patches were easy to remove from my lip or skin |
Time Frame | Day 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and have at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. There were differences in number of participants analyzed for each end point as represented by "n". |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
Protection (n= 4, 7) |
4.50
(1.00)
|
4.14
(1.07)
|
Facial Movements (n= 4, 7) |
1.50
(1.00)
|
2.29
(1.11)
|
Interpersonal Interaction (n= 4, 7) |
1.50
(0.58)
|
1.14
(0.38)
|
Cold Sore Coverage (n= 4, 7) |
4.75
(0.50)
|
4.57
(0.54)
|
Cold sore appearance (n= 4, 7) |
1.50
(0.58)
|
1.14
(0.38)
|
Ease of application (n= 4, 7) |
4.75
(0.50)
|
4.86
(0.38)
|
Bothersomeness (n= 4, 7) |
1.50
(1.00)
|
2.43
(1.40)
|
Adhesiveness (n= 4, 7) |
4.75
(0.50)
|
3.86
(1.35)
|
Patch removal (n = 3, 5) |
4.33
(0.58)
|
4.60
(0.89)
|
Title | Participant Assessment of Symptom Intensity at Day 5 |
---|---|
Description | Cold sore symptoms (pain, burning, itching) assessment was evaluated on a 5-point scale: 1=Never Bothered, 2=Rarely Bothered, 3=Bothered Some of the Time, 4=Bothered Often, 5=Bothered All the Time. |
Time Frame | Day 5 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and have at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. There were differences in number of participants analyzed for each end point as represented by "n". |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
Pain/Soreness (n = 11, 12) |
1.55
(0.82)
|
1.75
(1.22)
|
Itching (n = 11, 12) |
1.18
(0.41)
|
1.67
(0.99)
|
Burning (n = 11, 12) |
1.36
(0.67)
|
1.42
(0.67)
|
Title | Participant Assessment of Symptom Intensity at Day 10 |
---|---|
Description | Cold sore symptoms (pain, burning, itching) assessment was performed on a 5-point scale: 1=Never Bothered 2=Rarely Bothered 3=Bothered Some of the Time 4=Bothered Often 5=Bothered All the Time. |
Time Frame | Day 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: all randomized participants who had a patch applied to their cold sore and have at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. There were differences in the number of participants analyzed for each end point, as represented by "n". |
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area at a time. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area at a time. A maximum of 5 patches/ day were allowed during the 10 day study period. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 13 |
Pain/Soreness (n = 4, 7) |
1.00
(0.00)
|
1.29
(0.49)
|
Itching (n = 4, 7) |
1.00
(0.00)
|
1.14
(0.38)
|
Burning (n = 4, 7) |
1.00
(0.00)
|
1.00
(0.00)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse events were collected from UV exposure until the study completion assessments or the telephone follow-up for those participants not undergoing study completion assessments. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants applied single patch containing acyclovir to the cold sore area. | Participants applied single placebo patch to the cold sore area. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) | 0/13 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Acyclovir Patch | Placebo Patch | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/12 (0%) | 3/13 (23.1%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Lip Erosion | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Oral Herpes | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Hyperkeratosis | 0/12 (0%) | 0 | 1/13 (7.7%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | GSK Response Center |
---|---|
Organization | GlaxoSmithKline |
Phone | 866-435-7343 |
- E7411153