Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer After Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Introduction:
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in clinical dentistry due to their advantageous properties. However, they present inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to resin composites.
Aim:
Clinical evaluation of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement. .
Methodology:
Eighteen healthy patients with 36-second molar teeth will be selected where each patient should have two oclusso- mesial cavities. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities will be prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth will be restored with chemically cured conventional GICs without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth will be restored by chemically cured conventional GICs that enhanced with radiant heat (LED) (M2 group). functional and biological criteria of each restoration will be clinically evaluated at 4 time points
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Introduction:
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in clinical dentistry due to their advantageous properties. However, they present inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to resin composites. Various techniques have been suggested to improve properties of conventional GICs such as radiant heat transfer by Light Emitting Diode (LED) or lasers, ultrasonic energy transfer also using of (CaCl2) solution.
Aim:
Clinical evaluation of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement. .
Methodology:
Eighteen healthy patients with 36-second molar teeth will be selected where each patient should have two oclusso- mesial cavities. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities will be prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth will be restored with chemically cured conventional GICs without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth will be restored by chemically cured conventional GICs that enhanced with radiant heat (LED) (M2 group). functional and biological criteria of each restoration will be clinically evaluated immediately after restoration (T0), six months later (T1), and after 12 months (T2) using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: chemically cured conventional glass ionomer restorative (Ketac Universal Aplicap) For restoration of M1 group, capsule activation will be performed through loading of the KetacTM Universal AplicapTM GIC capsule into its activator keeping the applicator nozzle closed, using the ball of my hand to depress the activator lever firmly as far as it will go and hold it down for 2 to 4 seconds. Then the capsule will be mixed in a high frequency mixing device for 8 seconds. The mixed capsule will be immediately removed from the mixer and loaded into the AplicapTM Applier then application nozzle will be opened to extrude the mixture directly into the preparation as a single bulk within 1:40 minute. The preliminary contour will be done using a ball burnisher. |
Other: KetacTM Universal AplicapTM
chemically cured conventional GICs
|
Experimental: Ketac Universal Aplicap enhanced with light-emitting diode radiant heat Restoration of M2 group will be performed following the same steps which will be carried out for M1 group but the achieved restorations will be enhanced by light-emitting diode radiant heat for 60 seconds |
Other: KetacTM Universal AplicapTM with light cure
chemically cured conventional GICs with light curing enhancement
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical performance of biological properties [12 months]
Clinical performance of biological properties according to FDI criteria
- Clinical performance of Functional properties [12 months]
Clinical performance of Functional properties according to FDI criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age group 21 - 45 years.
-
Both males and females will be included.
-
Ability to return for periodic follow-up (good general health).
-
Only co-operative patients.
-
Vital upper or lower carious posterior teeth.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Teeth with any pathologic pulpal disease.
-
Teeth with previous restorations
-
Teeth with surface loss due to attrition, erosion, abrasion, or abfraction.
-
Patients with severe or chronic periodontitis.
-
Patients have allergy to the materials used in this trial. 6- Nonfunctioning teeth with no opposing dentition.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Faculty of dentistry, Suez Canal university | Ismailia | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Suez Canal University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 431/2021