Fluorescein vs. iMRI in Resection of Malignant High Grade Glioma

Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT02540135
Collaborator
(none)
0
1
2
40.6
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study plans to learn more about if fluorescein with intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is as good as intraoperative MRI (iMRI) alone in detecting the presence of tumor tissue during surgery.

Both fluorescein and intraoperative MRI have been studied and routinely used to aid the neurosurgeon in distinguishing normal brain from tumor, helping the neurosurgeon to safely resect more tumor tissue during surgery.

This study will enroll patients with malignant high grade glioma who are going to have a surgery to remove their brain tumor.

For half of the patients, fluorescein and intraoperative MRI will be used together during surgery. For half of the patients, only intraoperative MRI will be used during surgery. iMRI is used as final verification of complete, safe resection in both arms.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: fluorescein
  • Other: intraoperative MRI
N/A

Detailed Description

Extent of surgical resection of malignant high grade glioma has been established as one of the most important predictors of overall survival and six-month progression free survival. Unfortunately, it is often difficult in surgery to distinguish between tumor and normal brain. Various technologies have been developed to help the surgeon more readily safely increase extent of resection in order to achieve an improved survival after glioblastoma resection. Fluorescein has been used at some institutions for a number of years to improve visualization of high-grade gliomas enabling their better resection. Intraoperative MRI has also been developed with similar intent, allowing the patient to be imaged intraoperatively to determine extent of resection and any need for further resection prior to leaving the operating room. While there is some evidence these technologies improve extent of resection in comparison to historical controls, they have never been tested against each other in any prospective fashion.

Intraoperative MRI has significant cost and significantly increases operative time. Fluorescein is a very inexpensive injectable agent and, if as good at achieving gross total resection as intraoperative MRI, would offer patients similar surgical outcomes with less anesthetic time and cost than intraoperative MRI. This study aims to investigate the value of fluorescein or intraoperative MRI in malignant glioma patients' extent of tumor resection in a prospectively randomized manner.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Fluorescein vs. Intraoperative MRI in the Resection of Malignant High Grade Glioma
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 18, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 18, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Arm A

Flourescein plus intraoperative MRI

Other: fluorescein
fluorescein and conventional neuro-navigation

Other: intraoperative MRI
conventional neuro-navigation and iMRI
Other Names:
  • iMRI
  • Active Comparator: Arm B

    intraoperative MRI alone

    Other: intraoperative MRI
    conventional neuro-navigation and iMRI
    Other Names:
  • iMRI
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Extent of resection [36 hours]

      This outcome will utilize tumor volumetry of residual enhancing tumor after resection.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Surgical time difference [36 hours]

      This outcome will evaluate the difference in length of surgery time between each arm.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Presents with presumed or pathologically proven enhancing primary or secondary high grade glioma for surgical resection

    • Eligible for gross total resection of enhancing component of tumor

    • Karnofsy performance status >/= 70%

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Presence of multi-focal disease

    • Disease that crosses the mid-line

    • History of adverse reaction to flourescein

    • Known ongoing pregnancy

    • Inability to grant consent

    • Contraindication to perform iMRI

    • Contraindication to flourescein

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado United States 80045

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Colorado, Denver

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: David R Ormond, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Colorado, Denver
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02540135
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 15-1313
    First Posted:
    Sep 3, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 20, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2018
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by University of Colorado, Denver
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 20, 2018