Efficacy and Safety Study of PDT Using Photofrin in Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (OPUS)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a combination of a drug, porfimer sodium (Photofrin), which is activated by a light from a laser that emits no heat. This technique works to allow the medical doctor to specifically target and destroy abnormal or cancer cells while limiting damage to surrounding healthy tissue. The activation of the drug is done by lighting the abnormal areas using a fiber optic device (very fine fiber like a fishing line that permits light transmission) inserted into a flexible tube with a light called cholangioscope for the bile duct. The light will activate the porfimer sodium concentrated in the abnormal tissue, leading to its destruction.
This research study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT with porfimer sodium administered with Standard Medical Care (SMC) compared to SMC alone on the overall survival time of patients with non-operable advanced cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer of the bile ducts. It will involve 200 patients across North America and Europe. Other countries may participate if needed. Participation will last at least 18 months.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a combination of a drug, porfimer sodium (Photofrin), which is activated by a light from a laser that emits no heat. This technique works to allow the medical doctor to specifically target and destroy abnormal or cancer cells while limiting damage to surrounding healthy tissue. The activation of the drug is done by lighting the abnormal areas using a fiber optic device (very fine fiber like a fishing line that permits light transmission) inserted into a flexible tube with a light called cholangioscope for the bile duct. The light will activate the porfimer sodium concentrated in the abnormal tissue, leading to its destruction.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is defined as primary malignant tumors of the bile ducts. The exact etiology remains unknown. These cancerous tumors block the bile flow and can be intrahepatic (IH) or extrahepatic (EH). The distinction between IH- and EH-CCA has become increasingly important, as the epidemiological features (i.e., incidence and risk factors), the biologic and pathologic characteristics and the clinical course are largely different. Unfortunately, most subjects are found to have metastases or unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis. Median survival for subjects with unresectable perihilar-CCA varies between five and eight months. The one-year survival is 50%, with 20% surviving at two years and 10% at three years. Unresected CCA is a rapidly fatal process with cholangitis being a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in these subjects.
This study was designed to confirm the efficacy of PHOPDT + standard medical care (SMC) defined as stents plus gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy regimen on the overall survival of subjects with unresectable cholestasis perihilar Bismuth type III or IV - tumor TNM stage III or IVa CCA.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Photodynamic therapy-Photofrin plus SMC Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the i.v. injection of Photofrin followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) will be applied to the tumor. A second light application will be given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients will undergo stenting as part of standard medical care procedure. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) may be given at 3-month intervals. Standard Medical Care (SMC) is defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. |
Drug: Photodynamic therapy-Photofrin
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) will be applied to the tumor. A second light application will be given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients will undergo stenting as part of standard medical care procedure. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) may be given at 3-month intervals.
Other Names:
Procedure: Stenting procedure
As per standard medical procedures, stenting procedure consists in the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) when the ERCP approach has been unsuccessful.
Other Names:
Drug: Chemotherapy regimen
The regimen will comprise gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen may be administered if there is no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Standard Medical Care (SMC) Standard Medical Care (SMC) is defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen will comprise gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen may be administered if there is no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. |
Procedure: Stenting procedure
As per standard medical procedures, stenting procedure consists in the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) when the ERCP approach has been unsuccessful.
Other Names:
Drug: Chemotherapy regimen
The regimen will comprise gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen may be administered if there is no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall Survival Time [Up to 26 months]
Time from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the subject was known to be alive
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time-to-bilirubin Response [Up to 30 days]
From the date of randomization until the date of first documented bilirubin response
- Best Overall Tumor Response as Measured by the RECIST 1.1 Criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) [Up to 26 months]
From the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence the RECIST 1.1 criteria are applied (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
- Time-to-tumor Progression [Up to 26 months]
From the date of first documented response until the date that tumor progression was assessed
- Change From Baseline on Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 7 days]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, up to 4 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 13 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 16 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 29 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 41 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 54 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 66 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
- Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) [Baseline, 78 weeks]
The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) [Baseline, 7 days]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, up to 4 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 13 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 16 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 29 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 41 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 54 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 66 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
- Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 [Baseline, 78 weeks]
Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Males or females aged 18 or older
-
Diagnosed with radiologically and biopsy or cytology confirmed inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Bismuth Tumor Stage III/IV
-
Non-menopausal or non-sterile female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-HCG and use a medically acceptable form of birth control
-
Able to sign an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnostic of cholangiocarcinoma made more than 45 days prior to randomization
-
Cholangiocarcinoma with extra-hepatic metastasis or concurrent non-solid malignancy
-
Presence or history of other neoplasms (treated during the last five years prior to study entry) other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal carcinoma of the skin
-
Previously received photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma
-
Previously undergone surgical resection of the cholangiocarcinoma
-
Previously undergone chemotherapy, brachytherapy, or radiotherapy prior to entering the study
-
Previously undergone metal stent insertion
-
Porphyria or hypersensitivity to porphyrins (constituents of porfimer sodium), gemcitabine, cisplatin or other platinum-containing compounds
-
Presence of infection other than the infection of the bile duct (cholangitis)
-
Acute or chronic medical or psychological illnesses that prevent endoscopy procedures
-
Abnormal blood test results
-
Severe impairment of your kidney or liver function
-
Decompensated cirrhosis
-
Pregnant or intend to become pregnant, breastfeeding or intend to breast-feed during this study
-
Participated in another drug study within 90 days before this one
-
Unable or unwilling to complete the follow-up evaluations required for the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Western Regional Medical Center, Inc. | Goodyear | Arizona | United States | 85338 |
2 | Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | Scottsdale | Arizona | United States | 85259-5499 |
3 | University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90033-1026 |
4 | UC Davis Medical Center | Sacramento | California | United States | 95817 |
5 | University of Colorado Denver | Aurora | Colorado | United States | 80045 |
6 | Oschner Medical Center | Kenner | Louisiana | United States | 70065 |
7 | Henry Ford Health System | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48202 |
8 | SUNY Downstate Medical Center | Brooklyn | New York | United States | 11203 |
9 | Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York | United States | 14263 |
10 | Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York | United States | 10021 |
11 | Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | United States | 10032 |
12 | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | United States | 27710 |
13 | Southwestern Regional Medical Center, Inc. | Tulsa | Oklahoma | United States | 74133 |
14 | Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19107 |
15 | Allegheny Center for Digestive Health - AHN ASRI | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | 15212 |
16 | Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75208 |
17 | Virginia Mason Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98101 |
18 | Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital | Spokane | Washington | United States | 99204 |
19 | St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5B 1W8 |
20 | CHUM Hôpital St-Luc | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H2X 3J4 |
21 | Klinikum Ludwigsburg | Ludwigsburg | Baden Wuerttemberg | Germany | 71640 |
22 | Klinikum Mannheim GmbH | Mannheim | Baden Wuerttemberg | Germany | 68167 |
23 | Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universität Frankfurt | Frankfurt | Hessen | Germany | 60590 |
24 | Medizinische Hochschule Hannover | Hannover | Niedersachsen | Germany | 30625 |
25 | Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR) | Essen | Nordrhein Westfalen | Germany | D-45147 |
26 | Konkuk University Medical Center | Seoul | Gwangjin-gu | Korea, Republic of | 143-729 |
27 | Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital | Bucheon City | Gyeonggi-do | Korea, Republic of | 420-767 |
28 | Seoul National University Bundang Hospital | Seongnam-si | Gyeonggi-do | Korea, Republic of | 463-707 |
29 | Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System | Seoul | Seodaemun-gu | Korea, Republic of | 120-752 |
30 | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 110-744 | |
31 | UniversitätsSpital Zürich | Zürich | Switzerland | 8091 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Concordia Laboratories Inc.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michel Kahaleh, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- PIN-PHO1201
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | An independent expert panel acted as central assessors for subjects across all sites. Central assessors prospectively interpreted all abdominal CT and cholangiogram images taken at screening to establish the final diagnosis and to confirm the randomization. Central assessors had the authority to overrule the investigator's diagnosis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 15 | 13 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 15 | 13 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 15 | 13 | 28 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
63.4
(11.84)
|
66.6
(7.69)
|
64.9
(10.08)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
3
20%
|
5
38.5%
|
8
28.6%
|
Male |
12
80%
|
8
61.5%
|
20
71.4%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
12
80%
|
10
76.9%
|
22
78.6%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
3
20%
|
3
23.1%
|
6
21.4%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
5
33.3%
|
8
61.5%
|
13
46.4%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
1
6.7%
|
0
0%
|
1
3.6%
|
White |
9
60%
|
4
30.8%
|
13
46.4%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
1
7.7%
|
1
3.6%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
South Korea |
5
33.3%
|
8
61.5%
|
13
46.4%
|
United States |
9
60%
|
4
30.8%
|
13
46.4%
|
Germany |
1
6.7%
|
1
7.7%
|
2
7.1%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Overall Survival Time |
---|---|
Description | Time from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the subject was known to be alive |
Time Frame | Up to 26 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants randomized (intent-to-treat population) |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 13 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [days] |
444
|
387
|
Title | Time-to-bilirubin Response |
---|---|
Description | From the date of randomization until the date of first documented bilirubin response |
Time Frame | Up to 30 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Data not collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Best Overall Tumor Response as Measured by the RECIST 1.1 Criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) |
---|---|
Description | From the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence the RECIST 1.1 criteria are applied (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) |
Time Frame | Up to 26 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 9 | 8 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
56
373.3%
|
75
576.9%
|
Title | Time-to-tumor Progression |
---|---|
Description | From the date of first documented response until the date that tumor progression was assessed |
Time Frame | Up to 26 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Change From Baseline on Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 7 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At Day 7, all 15 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 9/13 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 9 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-0.7
(7.99)
|
0
(0)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. |
Time Frame | Baseline, up to 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At 4 weeks, 12 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 9 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 12 | 9 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
1.7
(5.77)
|
0
(0)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 13 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At 13 weeks, 8 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 8 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 8 | 8 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
0.0
(7.56)
|
2.5
(4.63)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 16 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At 16 weeks, 9 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 9 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 9 | 9 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-6.7
(15.00)
|
3.3
(5.00)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 29 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At 29 weeks, 6 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 5 in the SMC Alone group were analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 6 | 5 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
0.0
(8.94)
|
2.0
(4.47)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 41 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At 41 weeks, 2 subjects in the PDT +SMC group were analysed and 1 in the SMC Alone group was analysed. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 2 | 1 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
10.0
(14.14)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 54 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
At 54 weeks, only 1 subject in each group was measured. Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 1 | 1 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
0.0
(0.0)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 66 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Data not collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) |
---|---|
Description | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 78 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 7 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 9 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-2.2
(30.29)
|
0.0
(0.0)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, up to 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Not collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 13 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 7 | 8 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-7.1
(30.59)
|
6.2
(35.84)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 16 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 9 | 8 |
Mean (Standard Error) [score on a scale] |
-21.3
(33.88)
|
10.4
(31.10)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 29 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 4 | 5 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-12.5
(35.03)
|
5.0
(18.26)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 41 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 2 | 2 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
8.3
(11.79)
|
-16.7
(23.57)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 54 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Due to the premature termination of the study, there was insufficient data to allow statistical analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 1 | 1 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-8.3
(NA)
|
-33.3
(NA)
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 66 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 |
---|---|
Description | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 78 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No data collected |
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 26 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The SMC alone group enrolled 13 subjects but only 10 were treated thus there were only 10 subjects at risk for adverse events. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) | ||
Arm/Group Description | Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involved the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device. Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) was applied to the tumor. A second light application was given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients underwent stenting. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) could be given at 3-month intervals. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. | Standard Medical Care (SMC) was defined as stenting procedure plus chemotherapy regimen. The chemotherapy regimen comprised gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen could be administered if there was no disease progression or intolerable toxicity. As per SMC, stenting procedure consisted of the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/15 (6.7%) | 0/13 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 11/15 (73.3%) | 10/10 (100%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anemia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Pancytopenia | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Thrombocytopenia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Ascites | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||
Catheter site pain | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Pyrexia | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Biloma | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Cholangitis | 6/15 (40%) | 6 | 9/10 (90%) | 9 |
Cholecystitis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Haemobilia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatitis cholestatic | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Jaundice | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Portal vein thrombosis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Cholangitis acute | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Sepsis | 5/15 (33.3%) | 8 | 3/10 (30%) | 4 |
Septic shock | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Liver abcess | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Post-procedural complications | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute respiratory failure | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Deep vein thrombosis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Embolism | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Photodynamic Therapy-Photofrin Plus SMC | Standard Medical Care (SMC) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 13/15 (86.7%) | 10/10 (100%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Iron deficiency anemia | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Pancytopenia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Neutropenia | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Thrombocytopenia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Anemia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Aplastic anemia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Lymphadenitis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Splenic infarction | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Splenomegaly | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Cardiac failure congestive | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Tachycardia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Eustachian tube dysfunction | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Endocrine disorders | ||||
Adrenal insufficiency | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Eye disorders | ||||
Vision blurred | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Cataract | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Conjuctival hemorrhage | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Diplopia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Eye swelling | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 9/15 (60%) | 9 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Abdominal pain | 7/15 (46.7%) | 7 | 5/10 (50%) | 5 |
Constipation | 7/15 (46.7%) | 7 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Ascites | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Dry mouth | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Dyspepsia | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Vomiting | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Abdominal pain upper | 4/15 (26.7%) | 4 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Abdominal discomfort | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Abdominal distension | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Diarrhea | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Duodenal stenosis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Dysphagia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Feces discolored | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Gastric ulcer | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
GERD | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Hiatus hernia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Ileus | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Small intestinal hemorrhage | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Stomatitis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 6/15 (40%) | 6 | 2/10 (20%) | 4 |
Pyrexia | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 6/10 (60%) | 6 |
Chills | 4/15 (26.7%) | 4 | 4/10 (40%) | 4 |
Asthenia | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Catheter site pain | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Edema peripheral | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Catheter site discharge | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Catheter site injury | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Generalized edema | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Influenza-like illness | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Non-cardiac chest pain | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Peripheral swelling | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholangitis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Cholangitis acute | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Bile duct obstruction | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Cholecystitis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Cholestasis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Gallbladder perforation | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Jaundice | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Portal hypertension | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Septic shock | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Sepsis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Biliary tract infection bacteria | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Candida infection | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Catheter site infection | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Enterococcal bacteremia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Herpes simplex | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Oral candidiasis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Tinea pedis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Urinary tract infection | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Nausea | 1/15 (6.7%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Skin cut | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Procedural nausea | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Procedural vomiting | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Skin wound | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations | ||||
Bilirubine increase | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
CA-19 increase | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
GGT | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Weight decreased | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
AST increased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Alkaline phosphatase increased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Blood creatinine increased | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Blood magnesium decreased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Blood potassium decreased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Blood urea increased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Hemoglobin decreased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Heart rate increased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
INR increased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Neutrophil count decreased | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Platelet count decreased | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Pulse abnormal | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 6/15 (40%) | 6 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Hypokaliemia | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Hypoalbuminemia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Fluid imbalance | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Fluid overload | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Hyperglycemia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Hyperkaliemia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Hypocalcemia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Hypomagnesemia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Hyponatremia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Vitamine D deficiency | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Pain in extremity | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Groin pain | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Joint stiffness | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Muscle tightness | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 4/15 (26.7%) | 4 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Dizziness | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Neuropathy peripheral | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Asterixis | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Dysgeusia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Hyperaesthesia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Insomnia | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Anxiety | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Abnormal dreams | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Agitation | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Depression | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Food aversion | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Chromaturia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Uretherolithiasis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Calculus bladder | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Pollakiuria | 1/15 (6.7%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Urethrolithiasis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Dyspnea | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Oropharyngeal pain | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Atelectasis | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Epistaxis | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Productive cough | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Cough | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Hiccups | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Pulmonary congestion | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Pulmonary embolism | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Rhinorrhea | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Tonsillar disorder | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Upper airway cough syndrome | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Rash | 5/15 (33.3%) | 5 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Pruritis | 3/15 (20%) | 3 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Night sweats | 2/15 (13.3%) | 2 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Alopecia | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Blister | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 1/10 (10%) | 1 |
Photosensitivity reaction | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Pruritis generalized | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Rash erythmetous | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Solar lentigo | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Swelling face | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 0/10 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypotension | 1/15 (6.7%) | 1 | 3/10 (30%) | 3 |
Deep vein thrombosis | 0/15 (0%) | 0 | 2/10 (20%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Michelle Depot |
---|---|
Organization | At the request of Concordia Laboratories Inc. |
Phone | |
michelle.depot@advanzpharma.com |
- PIN-PHO1201