CARP: Treatment of Non-resectable Bile Duct Cancer With Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy

Sponsor
University of Leipzig (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05551299
Collaborator
Zentrum für Klinische Studien Leipzig (Other)
258
1
2
66
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Bile duct cancer is often diagnosed after curative options are no longer available. Stent therapy is used to keep the ducts open and can be combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) to extend life expectancy. PDT requires an injection of photosensitizer after which light of a particular wavelength is applied endoscopically to kill the cancer cells. Drawbacks include not only high costs and poor availability, but foremost that patients have to avoid direct sunlight for a period of weeks. Radio frequency ablation (RFA) together with stent implantation constitutes an alternative by which the cancer cells are killed through heat, also applied endoscopically. The RFA technology is more widely available and easier to deploy. However, it has not been studied extensively and no randomized trials exist comparing the two methods. This trial will compare survival in patients with a particular bile duct cancer depending on whether they receive PDT or RFA. Moreover, data will be collected on side-effects and quality of life.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Klatskin tumours are a form of bile duct cancer. They are generally not diagnosed until quite late and a curative operation is rarely a possibility. Their anatomic location usually results in bile duct obstruction and the aim of therapy is thus to keep the ducts open. This is accomplished through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by implanting stents. Stent therapy combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) extends life expectancy. PDT requires an injection of photosensitizer that is absorbed primarily by the cancer cells. Light of a particular wavelength is then applied with ERCP to kill the cancer cells. Drawbacks include not only high costs and poor availability, but foremost that patients have to avoid direct sunlight for a period of weeks. Radio frequency ablation (RFA) together with stent implantation constitutes an alternative by which the cancer cells are killed through heat applied during ERCP. The RFA technology is more widely available and easier to deploy. However, it has not been studied extensively and no randomized trials exist comparing the two methods. This trial will compare survival in patients with Klatskin tumours depending on whether they receive PDT or RFA. Moreover, data will be collected on side-effects and quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
258 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cholangiocarcinoma Treatment With Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2028
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2028

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Photodynamic therapy (PDT)

The index procedure in all patients at baseline includes stenting, using an endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) procedure. The Intervention is at least one PDT at baseline according to the clinical routine of the trial site.

Drug: Photosensitizer
A photosensitizer, which is absorbed preferentially by tumour cells, is administered 24 - 48 hours prior to PDT. Light of a particular wavelength is then applied during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to kill primarily cancer cells locally within the stenosis. Immediately after PDT treatment, new stents are inserted into all treated segments if needed.
Other Names:
  • Photodynamic therapy (PDT)
  • Experimental: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

    The index procedure in all patients at baseline includes stenting, using an endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) procedure. The Intervention is at least one RFA at baseline according to the clinical routine of the trial site.

    Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
    RFA is also carried out as part of an ERCP. The RFA-probe is placed within the tumour stenosis and electrical current is applied. New stents are inserted into all treated segments if needed.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall survival [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Hazard ratio from a Cox regression model will be used to compare randomization arms. Covariates will be stratification variables, classification of local inoperability, use of prophylactic antibiotics, Bismuth type and time between diagnosis and beginning RFA/PDT.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall survival (complementary perspective: median survival time) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Estimates of the difference in median survival time between the groups will be based on the method of Chen and Zhang (PMID: 26983640).

    2. Overall survival (complementary perspective: two-year overall survival) [up to two years]

      Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used.

    3. Overall survival (complementary perspective: restricted mean survival on a time horizon of two-years) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used (see e.g. PMID: 15690989)

    4. Days alive and out of hospital up to two years [up to two years]

      This constitutes a basic and easy to understand measure of quality of life. Only in-hospital stays will be included in this endpoint and the day of arrival and dismissal will each be counted. The source of data will be the hospital records, epicrisis and patient disclosure.

    5. Quality of Life (QoL) measured using QLQ-C30 at various points in time after randomization (V2 (14 days), V3 (ca. 3 months), as a function of time after 6 months, adjusting for the baseline value) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Prolonging life is especially worthwhile if QoL is sufficiently good. The established cancer-specific Core Quality of Life questionnaire QLQ-C30 from the EORTC (European Organisation for Research will be used. Shortly after the index therapy (V2, V3), the difference between arms will be assessed. The requirement to stay indoors may affect QoL. At later points in time, a description per arm is of interest and will be based on a weighted mean of all available questionnaires, weighting according to calendar time.

    6. Quality of Life (QoL) measured using FACT-Hep at various points in time after randomization (V2 (14 days), V3 (ca. 3 months), as a function of time after 6 months, adjusting for the baseline value) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Prolonging life is especially worthwhile if QoL is sufficiently good. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire, containing the hepatobiliary-specific cancer subscale, will be used as a second instrument for assessing QoL. Shortly after the index therapy (V2, V3), the difference between arms will be assessed. The requirement to stay indoors may affect QoL. At later points in time, a description per arm is of interest and will be based on a weighted mean of all available questionnaires, weighting according to calendar time.

    7. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Using QALYs, a weighted measure of survival will be compared between RFA and PDT that takes QoL into account. The details will be provided in a Statistical Analysis Plan.

    8. Stent patency based on clinician's assessment (e.g. cholangitis, cholestasis, ultrasound) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Stent patency provides one measure of the burden of the disease and efficacy of the treatment. Mean time to stent closure/replacement/death after last stent replacement will be analysed.

    9. Laboratory parameter (leucocytes) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    10. Laboratory parameter (haematocrit) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    11. Laboratory parameter (haemoglobin) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    12. Laboratory parameter (bilirubin) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    13. Laboratory parameter (albumin) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    14. Laboratory parameter (CA 19-9) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    15. Laboratory parameter (CRP) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    16. Laboratory parameter (ALT) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    17. Laboratory parameter (GGT) [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Changes in laboratory parameters after index treatment (V3) and as a function of time will be analysed and compared between randomization arms.

    18. Pruritus as reported by patients on a scale from 0 ("no itching") to 10 ("worst imaginable itching"). [through study completion, an average of 1 year]

      Pruritus will be analysed as a function of time.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (cytological or histological confirmation)

    2. Surgery is not planned

    3. Age ≥ 18 years

    4. Written informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Tumour not accessible endoscopically

    2. Known hypersensitivity to porphyrins or to any of the other ingredients of the photosensitizer chosen

    3. Leukopenia (< 2000/mm3)

    4. Thrombocytopenia (< 100,000 / mm³)

    5. Severe, uncorrected coagulopathy (at the discretion of the physician)

    6. Suspected erosion of major blood vessels, because of the risk of life-threatening mass haemorrhage exists

    7. Porphyria (clinician's assessment) or other light-exacerbated diseases

    8. Severely impaired liver and or kidney function (at the discretion of the physician)

    9. Bedridden for more than 50% of the time (similar to ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) grade 3)

    10. Planned surgical procedure within the next 30 days

    11. Concurrent eye disease that will require a slit lamp examination within the next 30 days

    12. Prior radiotherapy within the last four weeks

    13. Previous PDT or RFA

    14. Planned liver transplantation

    15. Fertile women (within two years of their last menstruation) without appropriate contraceptive measures (implanon, injections, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, partner with vasectomy) while participating in the trial (participants using a hormone-based method have to be informed of possible effects of the trial medication on contraception)

    16. Participation in other interventional trials

    17. Patients under legal supervision or guardianship

    18. Pregnant or nursing women

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Hospital of Leipzig, Department of Gastroenterology Leipzig Germany

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Leipzig
    • Zentrum für Klinische Studien Leipzig

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Albrecht Hoffmeister, Prof.Dr.med., Universitätsklinikum Leipzig; Bereich Gastroenterologie

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Albrecht Hoffmeister, Prof. Dr. med., University of Leipzig
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05551299
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CARP
    • 2022-500107-50-00
    • 434336116
    First Posted:
    Sep 22, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 18, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Albrecht Hoffmeister, Prof. Dr. med., University of Leipzig
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 18, 2022