HtDCS: A Novel Neurorehabilitation Approach for Cognitive Aging With HIV

Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02391311
Collaborator
(none)
42
1
2
10.1
4.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to conduct a small, self-contained project to test the hypothesis that tDCS will augment SOP cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) in older HIV+ adults. The investigators will randomly assign 60 HIV+ older adults (i.e., ≥ 50 years old) to 10-hours in either a SOP CRT + sham tDCS condition (n=30) or SOP CRT + active tDCS condition (n=30) and examine neurocognitive functioning at baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention. Hypothesis 1: The SOP CRT + active tDCS condition will show larger proximal (i.e., SOP) gains than the SOP CRT + sham tDCS condition. Hypothesis 2: The active tDCS condition will demonstrate generalization to secondary neurocognitive domains compared to the sham tDCS condition.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
42 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Speed of Processing Training With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older HIV+ Adults (HtDCS)
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation

Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition.

Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
Other Names:
  • transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)
  • Experimental: Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation

    Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition.

    Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
    Other Names:
  • transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in the Processing of Speed [baseline, 6 week posttest]

      Computerized and paper & pencil processing speed measures were used to evaluate this outcome. The Letter and Pattern Comparison Tasks are traditional paper and pencil (SOP) measures. Specifically, they assess perceptual speed. In Letter Comparison subjects are shown three sets of 32 pairs of letters containing 3, 6, or 9 segments. The participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns between the pairs are the same or different within each set, with a time limit of 20 sec per set. Pattern Comparison also presents three sets of 32 pairs of patterns with 3, 6, or 9 line segments. Similarly, participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns are the same or different within the 20 sec time limit. For each measure, the total score is the number of correct answers from all three sets. Larger scores indicate better reasoning and cognitive functioning. In this study scores from Letter and Pattern Comparison were combined for a total Letter/Pattern Score.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Driving Simulator Performance [baseline, 6 week posttest]

      Driving Simulator Performance: Center lane crossings (a count of how many times an individual crosses the centerline during the entire simulator drive). A difference score was taken between time 2 and time 1 and compared between treatment groups (sham condition and tDCS condition). A negative difference score indicates that fewer center line crossings were made at time 2 than time 1, while positive difference scores indicate the opposite direction, and scores of 0 represent no change.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    50 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • HIV+

    • Aged 50 and older

    • Patient at University HIV/AIDS Clinic

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Not homeless

    • Not blind or deaf

    • No significant neuromedical issues (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, stroke, epilepsy or history of seizures)

    • No pacemaker or other biomedical devices or metal implants

    • No untreated hypertension

    • Not undergoing chemo or radiation

    • No head injury with LOC greater than 30 mins

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 UAB 1917 Clinic Birmingham Alabama United States 35294

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Pariya L Fazeli, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Pariya L. Fazeli, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02391311
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • K99AG048762
    First Posted:
    Mar 18, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    May 15, 2017
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by Pariya L. Fazeli, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Protocol Open to Accrual: March 2015, Primary Completion Date: January 2016 and Study Completion Date: January 2016. Recruitment location: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
    Pre-assignment Detail 48 subjects were screened/eligible, however the phone screen did not include consenting. 42 showed up for baseline testing and were consented, thus 42 subjects were enrolled. 42 were randomized immediately after baseline testing, however 5 were either lost to followup or deemed ineligible after baseline testing. See below for further breakdown.
    Arm/Group Title Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Arm/Group Description Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions. Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 21 21
    COMPLETED 18 19
    NOT COMPLETED 3 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Total
    Arm/Group Description Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions. Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 16 17 33
    Age (years) [Mean (Full Range) ]
    Mean (Full Range) [years]
    55.63
    56
    55.82
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    5
    31.3%
    6
    35.3%
    11
    33.3%
    Male
    11
    68.8%
    11
    64.7%
    22
    66.7%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Asian
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    14
    87.5%
    14
    82.4%
    28
    84.8%
    White
    2
    12.5%
    3
    17.6%
    5
    15.2%
    More than one race
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    16
    100%
    17
    100%
    33
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change in the Processing of Speed
    Description Computerized and paper & pencil processing speed measures were used to evaluate this outcome. The Letter and Pattern Comparison Tasks are traditional paper and pencil (SOP) measures. Specifically, they assess perceptual speed. In Letter Comparison subjects are shown three sets of 32 pairs of letters containing 3, 6, or 9 segments. The participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns between the pairs are the same or different within each set, with a time limit of 20 sec per set. Pattern Comparison also presents three sets of 32 pairs of patterns with 3, 6, or 9 line segments. Similarly, participants are instructed to decide whether the patterns are the same or different within the 20 sec time limit. For each measure, the total score is the number of correct answers from all three sets. Larger scores indicate better reasoning and cognitive functioning. In this study scores from Letter and Pattern Comparison were combined for a total Letter/Pattern Score.
    Time Frame baseline, 6 week posttest

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    n=33 subjects were included in final analyses. Of the 37 that completed the study, 4 were deemed ineligible after they had completed the study due to confirmation with medical records they had conditions that may affect neurocognition (stroke and schizophrenia) although they self reported on the screen they did not have these conditions.
    Arm/Group Title Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Arm/Group Description Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions. Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
    Measure Participants 16 17
    Mean (Full Range) [units on a scale]
    2.63
    6.06
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Driving Simulator Performance
    Description Driving Simulator Performance: Center lane crossings (a count of how many times an individual crosses the centerline during the entire simulator drive). A difference score was taken between time 2 and time 1 and compared between treatment groups (sham condition and tDCS condition). A negative difference score indicates that fewer center line crossings were made at time 2 than time 1, while positive difference scores indicate the opposite direction, and scores of 0 represent no change.
    Time Frame baseline, 6 week posttest

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    While n=33 was the final sample used for the primary outcome analyses, n=30 was used for the secondary outcome as 3 subjects did not have available simulator data.
    Arm/Group Title Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Arm/Group Description Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions. Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
    Measure Participants 15 15
    Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Times crossing center lane]
    1.867
    -1.800

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Functioning at baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Arm/Group Description Subjects in the sham arm will be administered sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., tDCS will be administered for 30 seconds and then will automatically turn off). Sham group will have identical intervention of engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during sham tDCS as with the active tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions. Subjects in the active arm will be administered active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (i.e., 2.0 mA tDCS will be administered for 20 minutes and then will automatically turn off). Active group will have identical intervention engagement in 10 1-hour computerized cognitive remediation therapy sessions during active tDCS as with the sham tDCS condition. transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): tDCS is a low level electrical stimulation that will be applied to F10. The sham group will receive 2 mA (milliamps) for 30 seconds, while the experimental group will receive 2 mA for 20 minutes. Both groups will have 10, 1 hour sessions of playing cognitive remediation games, while receiving the respective level of tDCS for sham vs experimental conditions.
    All Cause Mortality
    Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/18 (0%) 0/19 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/18 (0%) 0/19 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Sham tDCS + Cognitive Remediation Active tDCS + Cognitive Remediation
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/18 (0%) 0/19 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Pariya L Fazeli, PhD
    Organization UAB
    Phone 205-996-0330
    Email plfazeli@uab.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Pariya L. Fazeli, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02391311
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • K99AG048762
    First Posted:
    Mar 18, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    May 15, 2017
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2017