TA: Treatment Advocacy Intervention for HIV-Positive African Americans
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that participants in the treatment advocacy intervention will show significantly better HIV treatment adherence than will participants in the no-treatment (wait-list) control group.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Compared to other races/ethnicities, African Americans with HIV have lower levels of engagement in care, are less likely to be on antiretroviral treatment (ART), and are more likely to delay care and ART initiation; those on ART are less likely to be adherent at high enough levels for the treatment to be effective. We propose to test an innovative, culturally relevant treatment advocacy (TA) intervention for African Americans with HIV that targets social, cultural, and structural issues contributing to poor HIV treatment behaviors. TA, which has been sustained in many community organizations throughout the HIV epidemic, has never been systematically evaluated. TA facilitates patient navigation through the medical system and provides tailored HIV treatment education and client-centered counseling to improve adherence and engagement in care. TA targets structural issues in healthcare and patients' lives by advocating to providers to improve patient-provider relationships, recommending changes in treatment and/or providers (if needed), and referring patients to mental health and social services. TA is particularly appropriate for African Americans with HIV, who may be mistrustful of providers: it can be conducted outside of the medical system in a safe, neutral community setting by individuals not associated with patients' healthcare. We developed a culturally relevant TA program that additionally discusses factors such as racism that undermine healthcare in Black communities, by acknowledging and directly addressing patients' medical mistrust and stigma as coping strategies that arise in response to oppression. The specific aims are to (1) conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of a culturally relevant TA program on adherence among African Americans with HIV; (2) identify culturally relevant mediators that explain the effects of treatment advocacy on antiretroviral treatment adherence among African Americans with HIV (e.g., improved behavioral adherence skills, coping with stress/discrimination, mental health, and patient satisfaction; lower levels of HIV misconceptions, internalized HIV stigma/homophobia, medical mistrust, and substance use); and (3) explore culturally relevant moderators of the effects of treatment advocacy on antiretroviral treatment adherence among African Americans with HIV (e.g., access to care, discrimination, incarceration, poverty, social support, spirituality, and trauma). A sample of 200 African Americans with HIV will be randomly assigned to a TA intervention or wait-list control group. Participants will complete surveys at screening, and at 3- and 6-months post-baseline, to assess pre-, intra-, and post-intervention effects on adherence.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Wait-list control Participants in the wait-list control group will not receive the intervention until after the 6-month follow-up assessment. |
|
Experimental: treatment advocacy Treatment advocacy is a 24-week intervention with booster sessions, including a 4-week intensive intervention followed by a 20-week maintenance period. In the first 4 weeks, all participants receive 4 individual weekly 60-minute sessions and 1 group HIV education session. In the next 20 weeks, all participants receive booster sessions in weeks 12 and 20, and a counselor check-in phone call in week 8 regarding need for new referrals and adherence barriers. Participants who have not demonstrated good adherence (≥90%) during the prior 2 weeks receive ≤4 additional booster sessions at weeks 14, 16, 22, and 24. Clients receive additional linkage with AIDS Project Los Angeles' (APLA) social service programs, as necessary. |
Behavioral: Treatment Advocacy
Treatment advocacy is a 24-week intervention with booster sessions, including a 4-week intensive intervention followed by a 20-week maintenance period. In the first 4 weeks, all participants receive 4 individual weekly 60-minute sessions and 1 group HIV education session. In the next 20 weeks, all participants receive booster sessions in weeks 12 and 20, and a counselor check-in phone call in week 8 regarding need for new referrals and adherence barriers. Participants who have not demonstrated good adherence (≥90%) during the prior 2 weeks receive ≤4 additional booster sessions at weeks 14, 16, 22, and 24. Clients receive additional linkage with APLA's social service programs, as necessary.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Medication Adherence [Baseline, 1.5 months, 3 months, 4.5 months, and 6 months]
We used a repeated measures linear regression modeling continuous adherence with intervention, linear time, and their interaction, and demographic covariates. Continuous adherence is measured as average percentages of doses taken.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18 years of age or older;
-
self-identify as African American or Black
-
client of APLA
-
they are on ART and missed at least 1 dose in the past month
-
they have a currently detectable or unknown HIV viral load (or have not had a viral load test within the last six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- received treatment advocacy in last 6 months
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AIDS Project Los Angeles | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90005 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Boston Children's Hospital
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Laura M Bogart, PhD, RAND
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- R01MD006058
- R01MD006058
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the wait-list control group will not receive the intervention until after the 6-month follow-up assessment. | Treatment advocacy is a 24-week intervention with booster sessions, including a 4-week intensive intervention followed by a 20-week maintenance period. In the first 4 weeks, participants receive 4 individual weekly 60-minute sessions and 1 group HIV education session. In the next 20 weeks, all participants receive booster sessions in weeks 12 and 20, and a counselor check-in phone call in week 8 regarding need for new referrals and adherence barriers. Participants who have not demonstrated good adherence (≥90%) during the prior 2 weeks receive ≤4 additional booster sessions at weeks 14, 16, 22, and 24. Clients receive additional linkage with APLA's social service programs, as necessary. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 108 | 108 |
COMPLETED | 85 | 86 |
NOT COMPLETED | 23 | 22 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the wait-list control group will not receive the intervention until after the 6-month follow-up assessment. | Treatment advocacy is a 24-week intervention with booster sessions, including a 4-week intensive intervention followed by a 20-week maintenance period. In the first 4 weeks, participants receive 4 individual weekly 60-minute sessions and 1 group HIV education session. In the next 20 weeks, all participants receive booster sessions in weeks 12 and 20, and a counselor check-in phone call in week 8 regarding need for new referrals and adherence barriers. Participants who have not demonstrated good adherence (≥90%) during the prior 2 weeks receive ≤4 additional booster sessions at weeks 14, 16, 22, and 24. Clients receive additional linkage with APLA's social service programs, as necessary. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 108 | 107 | 215 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
47.0
(10.2)
|
50.1
(10.0)
|
48.6
(10.2)
|
Sex/Gender, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
Male |
79
73.1%
|
78
72.9%
|
157
73%
|
Female |
24
22.2%
|
27
25.2%
|
51
23.7%
|
Transgender |
5
4.6%
|
2
1.9%
|
7
3.3%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
7
6.5%
|
6
5.6%
|
13
6%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
101
93.5%
|
101
94.4%
|
202
94%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Income (Count of Participants) | |||
None |
11
10.2%
|
10
9.3%
|
21
9.8%
|
>$0 - <$10K |
66
61.1%
|
53
49.5%
|
119
55.3%
|
$10K - $20K |
18
16.7%
|
35
32.7%
|
53
24.7%
|
>$20K - $30K |
10
9.3%
|
8
7.5%
|
18
8.4%
|
>$30K - $40K |
2
1.9%
|
0.0
0%
|
2
0.9%
|
Unknown |
1
0.9%
|
1
0.9%
|
2
0.9%
|
Education (Count of Participants) | |||
7th to 11th Grade |
17
15.7%
|
23
21.5%
|
40
18.6%
|
High School diploma or GED |
37
34.3%
|
33
30.8%
|
70
32.6%
|
Some college |
41
38%
|
40
37.4%
|
81
37.7%
|
College degree |
6
5.6%
|
7
6.5%
|
13
6%
|
Some graduate school |
3
2.8%
|
4
3.7%
|
7
3.3%
|
Graduate degree |
4
3.7%
|
0.0
0%
|
4
1.9%
|
Housing Status (Count of Participants) | |||
Rent/Own |
65
60.2%
|
69
64.5%
|
134
62.3%
|
Treatment facility |
9
8.3%
|
2
1.9%
|
11
5.1%
|
Subsidized / Sect. 8 |
8
7.4%
|
8
7.5%
|
16
7.4%
|
Friend / relative |
11
10.2%
|
8
7.5%
|
19
8.8%
|
Temporary or transitional |
9
8.3%
|
13
12.1%
|
22
10.2%
|
Homeless |
5
4.6%
|
6
5.6%
|
11
5.1%
|
Other |
1
0.9%
|
1
0.9%
|
2
0.9%
|
Employment Status (Count of Participants) | |||
Full time |
4
3.7%
|
1
0.9%
|
5
2.3%
|
Part time |
4
3.7%
|
5
4.7%
|
9
4.2%
|
Unemployed |
63
58.3%
|
71
66.4%
|
134
62.3%
|
Retired |
19
17.6%
|
14
13.1%
|
33
15.3%
|
Other |
18
16.7%
|
17
15.9%
|
35
16.3%
|
Length of Time Diagnosed (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
15.3
(8.8)
|
15.5
(7.9)
|
15.5
(8.3)
|
Viral Load (Count of Participants) | |||
Detectable |
41
38%
|
30
28%
|
71
33%
|
Undetectable (<200 copies) |
41
38%
|
54
50.5%
|
95
44.2%
|
Unknown |
26
24.1%
|
23
21.5%
|
49
22.8%
|
CD4 Cell Count (cells per microliter) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cells per microliter] |
534
(316)
|
650
(343)
|
593
(334)
|
Received HIV care in last 6 months (Count of Participants) | |||
received HIV care |
103
95.4%
|
102
95.3%
|
205
95.3%
|
did not receive HIV care |
5
4.6%
|
5
4.7%
|
10
4.7%
|
Sexual Orientation (Count of Participants) | |||
Straight |
36
33.3%
|
43
40.2%
|
79
36.7%
|
Gay man |
50
46.3%
|
42
39.3%
|
92
42.8%
|
Gay woman |
1
0.9%
|
3
2.8%
|
4
1.9%
|
Bisexual |
16
14.8%
|
16
15%
|
32
14.9%
|
Not Sure |
1
0.9%
|
2
1.9%
|
3
1.4%
|
Other |
4
3.7%
|
2
1.9%
|
6
2.8%
|
Ever Incarcerated (Count of Participants) | |||
ever incarcerated |
58
53.7%
|
59
55.1%
|
117
54.4%
|
never incarcerated |
49
45.4%
|
48
44.9%
|
97
45.1%
|
Unknow |
1
0.9%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Medication Adherence |
---|---|
Description | We used a repeated measures linear regression modeling continuous adherence with intervention, linear time, and their interaction, and demographic covariates. Continuous adherence is measured as average percentages of doses taken. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 1.5 months, 3 months, 4.5 months, and 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the wait-list control group will not receive the intervention until after the 6-month follow-up assessment. | Treatment Advocacy: Treatment advocacy is a 24-week intervention with booster sessions, including a 4-week intensive intervention followed by a 20-week maintenance period. In the first 4 weeks, all participants receive 4 individual weekly 60-minute sessions and 1 group HIV education session. In the next 20 weeks, all participants receive booster sessions in weeks 12 and 20, and a counselor check-in phone call in week 8 regarding need for new referrals and adherence barriers. Participants who have not demonstrated good adherence (≥90%) during the prior 2 weeks receive ≤4 additional booster sessions at weeks 14, 16, 22, and 24. Clients receive additional linkage with APLA's social service programs, as necessary. This description is subject to change after consideration by the community advisory board. |
Measure Participants | 85 | 86 |
Baseline |
77.96
(23.15)
|
80.13
(21.74)
|
1.5 month follow-up |
64.87
(33.88)
|
76.13
(25.55)
|
3 month follow-up |
63.44
(33.01)
|
76.76
(24.60)
|
4.5 month follow-up |
63.69
(32.08)
|
79.17
(25.31)
|
6 month follow-up |
56.50
(33.97)
|
78.76
(22.46)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Wait-list Control, Treatment Advocacy |
---|---|---|
Comments | We used generalized linear mixed models predicting adherence at baseline and 1.5-, 3-, 4.5-, and 6-months post-baseline, with intervention , time, interaction between intervention and time, medical and socio-demographic covariates, and baseline viral load. Sample size was determined with a power analysis assuming .80 power and an alpha level of .05 that would allow for detection of a small-to-medium effect size in adherence between arms. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .005 |
Comments | a priori threshold for significance for p < .05 | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 0.79 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.69 to 0.91 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants in the wait-list control group will not receive the intervention until after the 6-month follow-up assessment. | Treatment advocacy is a 24-week intervention with booster sessions, including a 4-week intensive intervention followed by a 20-week maintenance period. In the first 4 weeks, participants receive 4 individual weekly 60-minute sessions and 1 group HIV education session. In the next 20 weeks, all participants receive booster sessions in weeks 12 and 20, and a counselor check-in phone call in week 8 regarding need for new referrals and adherence barriers. Participants who have not demonstrated good adherence (≥90%) during the prior 2 weeks receive ≤4 additional booster sessions at weeks 14, 16, 22, and 24. Clients receive additional linkage with APLA's social service programs, as necessary. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/108 (0%) | 0/107 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Wait-list Control | Treatment Advocacy | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/108 (0%) | 0/107 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Laura M. Bogart, PhD |
---|---|
Organization | RAND Corporation |
Phone | (310) 393-0411 ext 7281 |
lbogart@rand.org |
- R01MD006058
- R01MD006058