Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03399786
Collaborator
(none)
65
30
2
25.9
2.2
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by evinacumab intravenously (IV) in comparison to placebo after 24 weeks in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the effect of evinacumab IV on other lipid parameters, evaluate the effect of evinacumab on LDL-C goal attainment, assess the effect of evinacumab on eligibility for apheresis (using German and US apheresis criteria), evaluate the safety and tolerability of evinacumab in patients with HoFH, assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of evinacumab in patients with HoFH and evaluate the potential development of anti-evinacumab antibodies.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
65 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 18, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 10, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 17, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: evinacumab

Drug: evinacumab
IV administration of evinacumab
Other Names:
  • REGN1500
  • Experimental: Placebo

    Drug: Placebo
    IV administration of placebo

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent Change in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change was calculated as 100x(calculated LDL-C value at Week 24 - calculated LDL-C value at baseline)/calculated LDL-C value at baseline. The baseline LDL-C value was the last calculated LDL-C value obtained before the first dose of double-blind-study drug. The calculated LDL-C at week 24 was the LDL-C value obtained within the week 24 efficacy analysis window, regardless of adherence to treatment and subsequent therapies (intent-to-treat [ITT] estimand). The ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change in Apo B from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    2. Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    3. Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change in TC from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    4. Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [At Week 24]

      Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in calculated LDL-C ≥30% at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    5. Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [At Week 24]

      Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in calculated LDL-C ≥ 50% at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    6. Absolute Change in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Absolute change in calculated LDL-C from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    7. Percentage of Participants Who Met United States (US) Apheresis Eligibility Criteria at Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [At Week 24]

      US apheresis eligibility criteria included participants who had inadequate response to diet and LMTs after 6 months of treatment and with functional Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) or Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) (with 0-1 risk factor) with LDL-C ≥ 300 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L). Percentage of participants who met US apheresis eligibility criteria at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    8. Percentage of Participants With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (2.59 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [At Week 24]

      Percentage of participants with LDL-C value <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) in the DBTP at Week 24 was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analysed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    9. Percentage of Participants Who Met European Union (EU) Apheresis Eligibility Criteria at Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [At Week 24]

      EU apheresis eligibility criteria included participants who had inadequate response to diet and Lipid modifying therapies (LMTs) after 3 months of treatment, Primary prevention: Participants with Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with LDL-C >160 mg/dL (4.2 mmol/L) and Cardiovascular (CV) events in close relatives. Secondary prevention: Participants with progressive CV events with LDL-C > 120 to 130 mg/dL (3.1-3.4 mmol/L). Percentage of participants who met EU apheresis eligibility criteria at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    10. Percentage of Participants With Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [At Week 24]

      Percentage of participants with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    11. Percent Change in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change from baseline in TG at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    12. Percent Change in Lipoprotein A (Lp[a]) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change in Lp(a) from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    13. Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Absolute change in Apo B from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    14. Absolute Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Absolute change in non-HDL-C from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    15. Absolute Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Absolute change in TC from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    16. Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand) [Week 24]

      Percent change in Apo CIII from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    12 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Key Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Diagnosis of functional HoFH

    2. If undergoing LDL apheresis, must have initiated LDL apheresis at least 3 months prior to screening and must have been on a stable weekly or every other week schedule and/or stable settings for at least 8 weeks

    3. Willing to consistently maintain his/her usual low fat or heart-healthy diet for the duration of the study

    Key Exclusion Criteria:
    1. LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at the screening visit

    2. Background medical Lipid Modifying Therapy (LMT) (if applicable) that has not been stable before the screening visit

    3. Lipid-apheresis schedule /apheresis settings (if applicable) that have not been stable for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit

    4. Use of nutraceuticals or over-the-counter therapies known to affect lipids, at a dose/amount that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit

    5. Presence of any clinically significant uncontrolled endocrine disease known to influence serum lipids or lipoproteins

    6. Newly diagnosed (within 3 months prior to randomization visit) diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled (HbA1c >9%) diabetes

    7. History of a MI, unstable angina leading to hospitalization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, carotid surgery or stenting, stroke, transient ischemic attack, valve replacement surgery, carotid revascularization, endovascular procedure or surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease within 3 months prior to the screening visit

    8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women

    9. Sexually active women of child bearing potential (WOCBP), who are unwilling to practice a highly effective birth control method prior to the initial dose, during the study, and for 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug

    10. Men who are sexually active with women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) and are unwilling to consistently use condoms during the study drug treatment period and for 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug regardless of vasectomy status

    Note: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Regeneron Research Site Boca Raton Florida United States 33434
    2 Regeneron Research Site Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
    3 Regeneron Research Site New York New York United States 10029
    4 Regeneron Research Site Cincinnati Ohio United States 45227
    5 Regeneron Research Site Portland Oregon United States 97239
    6 Regeneron Research Site Dallas Texas United States 78226
    7 Regeneron Research Site Camperdown New South Wales Australia 2050
    8 Regeneron Research Site Perth Western Australia Australia 6000
    9 Regeneron Research Site Innsbruck Austria 6020
    10 Regeneron Research Site Chicoutimi Quebec Canada G7H 7K9
    11 Regeneron Research Site Québec Quebec Canada G1V 4W2
    12 Regeneron Research Site Paris Cedex France 75651
    13 Regeneron Research Site Marseille France 13385
    14 Regeneron Research Site Ioánnina Ioannina Greece 45500
    15 Regeneron Research Site Athens Greece 17674
    16 Regeneron Research Site # 2 Napoli Italy 80131
    17 Regeneron Research Site Kurume Fukuoka Japan 830-8522
    18 Regeneron Research Site Nishinomiya Hyogo Japan 662-0918
    19 Regeneron Research Site Kanazawa Ishikawa Japan 920-8641
    20 Regeneron Research Site #3 Suita Osaka Japan 565-0871
    21 Regeneron Research Site Suita Osaka Japan 565-8565
    22 Regeneron Research Site Osaka Japan 530-0001
    23 Regeneron Research Site Amsterdam Netherlands 1105 AZ
    24 Regeneron Research Site Rotterdam Netherlands 3045 PM
    25 Regeneron Research Site Parktown Johannesburg South Africa 2000
    26 Regeneron Research Site Ivano-Frankivs'k Ukraine 76075
    27 Regeneron Research Site Kharkiv Ukraine 61039
    28 Regeneron Research Site #2 Kharkiv Ukraine 61176
    29 Regeneron Research Site #2 Kyiv Ukraine 02660
    30 Regeneron Research Site Kyiv Ukraine 03680

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Clinical Trial Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03399786
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • R1500-CL-1629
    • 2017-001388-19
    First Posted:
    Jan 16, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details This study was conducted at 30 centers that enrolled participants in 11 countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and Australia. Randomization was stratified by apheresis treatment status and by region (Japan, Rest of the World [ROW]).
    Pre-assignment Detail A total of 75 participants were screened and 65 participants randomized. There were 10 participants that were considered screen failures.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W (DBTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (DBTP) Placebo IV Q4W (OLTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (OLTP)
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants in the placebo arm who completed the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). All participants in the evinacumab arm who completed the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Period Title: Double-blind Treatment Period (DBTP)
    STARTED 22 43 0 0
    COMPLETED 21 43 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 1 0 0 0
    Period Title: Double-blind Treatment Period (DBTP)
    STARTED 0 0 20 44
    COMPLETED 0 0 19 43
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 1 1

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 22 43 65
    Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    36.7
    (11.52)
    44.3
    (16.78)
    41.7
    (15.54)
    Age, Customized (Number) [Number]
    ≥12 years to <18 years of age
    1
    4.5%
    1
    2.3%
    2
    3.1%
    ≥18 years to <45 years of age
    16
    72.7%
    23
    53.5%
    39
    60%
    ≥45 years to <65 years of age
    5
    22.7%
    11
    25.6%
    16
    24.6%
    ≥65 years to <75 years of age
    0
    0%
    7
    16.3%
    7
    10.8%
    ≥75 years of age
    0
    0%
    1
    2.3%
    1
    1.5%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    11
    50%
    24
    55.8%
    35
    53.8%
    Male
    11
    50%
    19
    44.2%
    30
    46.2%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    1
    4.5%
    1
    2.3%
    2
    3.1%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    20
    90.9%
    38
    88.4%
    58
    89.2%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    1
    4.5%
    4
    9.3%
    5
    7.7%
    Race (Count of Participants)
    White
    17
    77.3%
    31
    72.1%
    48
    73.8%
    Black or African American
    0
    0%
    2
    4.7%
    2
    3.1%
    Asian
    4
    18.2%
    6
    14%
    10
    15.4%
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Not Reported
    0
    0%
    2
    4.7%
    2
    3.1%
    Other
    1
    4.5%
    2
    4.7%
    3
    4.6%
    Calculated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Milligrams per Deciliter (mg/dL)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Milligrams per Deciliter (mg/dL)]
    246.5
    (153.71)
    259.5
    (172.40)
    255.1
    (165.21)
    Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) (mg/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL]
    175.9
    (98.76)
    169.1
    (82.75)
    171.4
    (87.78)
    Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (mg/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL]
    269.9
    (157.81)
    281.9
    (172.61)
    277.8
    (166.60)
    Total Cholesterol (TC) (mg/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL]
    315.9
    (150.44)
    325.6
    (170.76)
    322.3
    (163.05)
    Lipoprotein A (Lp[a]) (Nanomoles per Liter (nmol/L)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Nanomoles per Liter (nmol/L)]
    103.4
    (109.43)
    111.3
    (114.40)
    108.7
    (111.95)
    Fasting Triglycerides (TG) (mg/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL]
    144.1
    (144.54)
    113.1
    (68.39)
    123.6
    (100.71)
    Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) (mg/dL) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dL]
    9.7
    (5.23)
    9.2
    (4.00)
    9.39
    (4.42)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Estimand)
    Description Percent change was calculated as 100x(calculated LDL-C value at Week 24 - calculated LDL-C value at baseline)/calculated LDL-C value at baseline. The baseline LDL-C value was the last calculated LDL-C value obtained before the first dose of double-blind-study drug. The calculated LDL-C at week 24 was the LDL-C value obtained within the week 24 efficacy analysis window, regardless of adherence to treatment and subsequent therapies (intent-to-treat [ITT] estimand). The ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    1.9
    (6.5)
    -47.1
    (4.6)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments Confidence interval (CI) with p-value was based on-treatment group difference of least squares (LS) means using mixed-effect model repeat measurement (MMRM), randomization strata, treatment/strata/baseline value-by-time point interaction and continuous fixed covariates of baseline calculated LDL-C value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measure (MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -49.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -65.0 to -33.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 8.0
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percent change in Apo B from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    -4.5
    (4.8)
    -41.4
    (3.3)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. CI with p-value was based on-treatment group difference of LS means using MMRM, randomization strata, treatment/strata/baseline value-by-time point interaction and continuous fixed covariates of baseline calculated Apo B value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measure (MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -36.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -48.6 to -25.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 5.9
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    2.0
    (5.4)
    -49.7
    (3.8)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. CI with p-value was based on-treatment group difference of LS means using MMRM, randomization strata, treatment/strata/baseline value-by-time point interaction and continuous fixed covariates of baseline calculated non-HDL-C value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measure (MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -51.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -64.8 to -38.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 6.6
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percent change in TC from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    1.0
    (4.2)
    -47.4
    (3.0)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. CI with p-value was based on-treatment group difference of LS means using MMRM, randomization strata, treatment/strata/baseline value-by-time point interaction and continuous fixed covariates of baseline calculated TC value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measure (MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -48.4
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -58.7 to -38.1
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 5.1
    Estimation Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With ≥30% Reduction in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in calculated LDL-C ≥30% at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame At Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    18.2
    82.7%
    83.7
    194.7%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for secondary endpoints in pre-specified order to control type I error.Testing sequence continued only when previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05.Multiple imputation addressed missing data at week 24.Combined estimate for odds ratio obtained by Rubin's formulae.Logistic regression models stratified by randomized strata include fixed categorical effect of treatment group & continuous fixed covariate of baseline calculated LDL-C.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments A 2-step multiple imputation method addressed missing values (seeds = 1629 & 9261 with number of imputations = 100 in first and number of imputation=1 in second step).
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments
    Method Logistic Regression Models Analyses
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 25.2
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    5.7 to 110.5
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Reduction in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in calculated LDL-C ≥ 50% at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame At Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    4.5
    20.5%
    55.8
    129.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for secondary endpoints in pre-specified order to control type I error.Testing sequence continued only when previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05.Multiple imputation addressed missing data at week 24.Combined estimate for odds ratio obtained by Rubin's formulae.Logistic regression models stratified by randomized strata include fixed categorical effect of treatment group & continuous fixed covariate of baseline calculated LDL-C.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments A 2-step multiple imputation method addressed missing values (seeds = 1629 & 9261 with number of imputations = 100 in first and number of imputation=1 in second step).
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.0028
    Comments
    Method Logistic Regression Models Analyses
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 24.2
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    3.0 to 195.6
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change in Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Absolute change in calculated LDL-C from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Milligrams per Deciliter (mg/dL)]
    -2.6
    (17.6)
    -134.7
    (12.4)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. CI with p-value was based on-treatment group difference of LS means using MMRM, randomization strata, treatment/strata/baseline value-by-time point interaction and continuous fixed covariates of baseline calculated LDL-C value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value < 0.0001
    Comments
    Method Mixed-effect Model Repeat Measure (MMRM)
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
    Estimated Value -132.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    -175.3 to -88.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
    Value: 21.5
    Estimation Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Met United States (US) Apheresis Eligibility Criteria at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description US apheresis eligibility criteria included participants who had inadequate response to diet and LMTs after 6 months of treatment and with functional Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) or Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) (with 0-1 risk factor) with LDL-C ≥ 300 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L). Percentage of participants who met US apheresis eligibility criteria at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame At Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    22.7
    103.2%
    7.0
    16.3%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. Combined estimate for odds ratio was obtained by using Rubin's formulae. Logistic regression models stratified the fixed categorical effect of treatment group and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline calculated LDL-C value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments A 2-step multiple imputation method addressed missing values (seeds = 1629 & 9261 with number of imputations = 100 in first and number of imputation=1 in second step).
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.0845
    Comments
    Method Logistic Regression Models Analyses
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 0.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0 to 1.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (2.59 Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percentage of participants with LDL-C value <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) in the DBTP at Week 24 was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analysed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame At Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    22.7
    103.2%
    46.5
    108.1%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. Combined estimate for odds ratio was obtained by using Rubin's formulae. Logistic regression models stratified the fixed categorical effect of treatment group and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline calculated LDL-C value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments A 2-step multiple imputation method addressed missing values (seeds = 1629 & 9261 with number of imputations = 100 in first and number of imputation=1 in second step).
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.0203
    Comments The p-value is nominal for descriptive purpose only due to statistical hypothesis testing terminated previously.
    Method Logistic Regression Models Analyses
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 5.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.3 to 24.9
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Met European Union (EU) Apheresis Eligibility Criteria at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description EU apheresis eligibility criteria included participants who had inadequate response to diet and Lipid modifying therapies (LMTs) after 3 months of treatment, Primary prevention: Participants with Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with LDL-C >160 mg/dL (4.2 mmol/L) and Cardiovascular (CV) events in close relatives. Secondary prevention: Participants with progressive CV events with LDL-C > 120 to 130 mg/dL (3.1-3.4 mmol/L). Percentage of participants who met EU apheresis eligibility criteria at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame At Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    77.3
    351.4%
    32.6
    75.8%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo IV Q4W, Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Comments A 2-sided hierarchical testing procedure was used for the secondary endpoints in a pre-specified order to control type I error. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when the previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.05 level. Combined estimate for odds ratio was obtained by using Rubin's formulae. Logistic regression models stratified the fixed categorical effect of treatment group and the continuous fixed covariate of baseline calculated LDL-C value.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments A 2-step multiple imputation method addressed missing values (seeds = 1629 & 9261 with number of imputations = 100 in first and number of imputation=1 in second step).
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value = 0.0004
    Comments The p-value is nominal for descriptive purpose only due to statistical hypothesis testing terminated previously.
    Method Logistic Regression Models Analysis
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
    Estimated Value 0.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.0 to 0.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percentage of participants with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame At Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    4.5
    20.5%
    27.9
    64.9%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Fasting Triglycerides (TG) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percent change from baseline in TG at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    -4.6
    (7.0)
    -55.0
    (3.1)
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Lipoprotein A (Lp[a]) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percent change in Lp(a) from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    -3.6
    (5.8)
    -5.5
    (4.0)
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Absolute change in Apo B from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mg/dL]
    -8.0
    (9.1)
    -74.4
    (6.3)
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Absolute change in non-HDL-C from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mg/dL]
    -0.4
    (17.4)
    -148.0
    (12.3)
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Absolute Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Absolute change in TC from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [mg/dL]
    -0.4
    (17.2)
    -161.6
    (12.2)
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline to Week 24 (ITT Estimand)
    Description Percent change in Apo CIII from baseline at Week 24 in the DBTP was reported; value obtained regardless of adherence to study treatment and subsequent therapies (ITT estimand). ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose or part of a dose of double-blind study drug. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization (i.e., as randomized participant group).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W Evinacumab 15 mg/kg IV Q4W
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants who completed the double-blind treatment period received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    Measure Participants 22 43
    Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percent Change]
    5.8
    (5.5)
    -84.1
    (3.9)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame All Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up until end of study (Week 68) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product (IP).
    Adverse Event Reporting Description For purpose of safety analysis, arm assignments for participants in Safety Set were based on actual treatment received, such that 1 participant assigned to Placebo arm who inadvertently received evinacumab 15mg/kg was included in Evinacumab 15mg/kg arm
    Arm/Group Title Placebo IV Q4W (DBTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (DBTP) Placebo IV Q4W (OLTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (OLTP)
    Arm/Group Description Participants received IV infusion of placebo matched to evinacumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). Participants received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from day 1 to week 20 in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP). All participants in the placebo arm who completed the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP). All participants in the evinacumab arm who completed the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) received IV infusion of evinacumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg Q4W from week 24 to week 44 in the open-label treatment period (OLTP).
    All Cause Mortality
    Placebo IV Q4W (DBTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (DBTP) Placebo IV Q4W (OLTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (OLTP)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/21 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 0/20 (0%) 0/44 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Placebo IV Q4W (DBTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (DBTP) Placebo IV Q4W (OLTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (OLTP)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/21 (0%) 2/44 (4.5%) 0/20 (0%) 7/44 (15.9%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Angina pectoris 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Angina unstable 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Cardiac failure congestive 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Coronary artery disease 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Eye disorders
    Glaucoma 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Infections and infestations
    Pyelonephritis 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Urosepsis 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1 0/20 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Cardiac procedure complication 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Carotid artery restenosis 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Psychiatric disorders
    Suicide attempt 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1 0/20 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Nephrocalcinosis 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Vascular disorders
    Aortic stenosis 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Placebo IV Q4W (DBTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (DBTP) Placebo IV Q4W (OLTP) Evinacumab 15 mg/kg (OLTP)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 13/21 (61.9%) 20/44 (45.5%) 12/20 (60%) 19/44 (43.2%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Toothache 2/21 (9.5%) 2 2/44 (4.5%) 8 1/20 (5%) 1 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Nausea 1/21 (4.8%) 1 1/44 (2.3%) 1 0/20 (0%) 0 3/44 (6.8%) 4
    Constipation 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 2 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    General disorders
    Influenza like illness 0/21 (0%) 0 5/44 (11.4%) 5 0/20 (0%) 0 2/44 (4.5%) 2
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis 5/21 (23.8%) 6 7/44 (15.9%) 7 1/20 (5%) 2 5/44 (11.4%) 5
    Urinary tract infection 2/21 (9.5%) 3 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1
    Gastroenteritis viral 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Influenza 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Procedural headache 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Vaccination complication 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Investigations
    Aspartate aminotransferase increased 2/21 (9.5%) 2 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0
    Bacterial test positive 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Serum ferritin decreased 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Myalgia 2/21 (9.5%) 2 0/44 (0%) 0 0/20 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0
    Back pain 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1 0/20 (0%) 0 3/44 (6.8%) 3
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 5/21 (23.8%) 6 4/44 (9.1%) 7 1/20 (5%) 2 5/44 (11.4%) 5
    Psychiatric disorders
    Generalised anxiety disorder 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Insomnia 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Haematuria 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Menstrual discomfort 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthma 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Rhinorrhoea 0/21 (0%) 0 3/44 (6.8%) 4 0/20 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Dermatitis contact 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Pruritus generalised 0/21 (0%) 0 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 2 0/44 (0%) 0
    Urticaria 0/21 (0%) 0 1/44 (2.3%) 1 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 1/21 (4.8%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0 1/20 (5%) 1 0/44 (0%) 0

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The investigator has the right to independently publish study results from the investigator's site after a multi-center publication, or a defined period after the completion of the study by all sites. The investigator must provide the sponsor a copy of any such publication derived from the study for review and comment in advance of any submission, and delay publication, if requested, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Clinical Trials Administrator
    Organization Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Phone 844-734-6643
    Email clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
    Responsible Party:
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03399786
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • R1500-CL-1629
    • 2017-001388-19
    First Posted:
    Jan 16, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2021