A Precision and Accuracy Study of the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) System.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the agreement rate between the CODMAN Valve Position Verification (VPV) adjustment outcome (reprogramming) and X-ray verification in order to support an alternative to X-ray confirmation with respect to the valve adjustment process.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Patients with Hydrocephalus, managed with an implanted Codman HakimTM Programmable Valve (CHPV), occasionally visit their physician to have their valve adjusted to a different setting to manage their condition. After the adjustment, an x-ray of the skull is taken to confirm the valve setting.
The Codman VPV System is designed to facilitate and confirm the adjustment of a CHPV. After signing the informed consent, Subjects will be enrolled in the study and have their CHPV adjusted using the Codman VPV System. After the adjustment, an x-ray of the skull will be taken to verify the valve setting. No further follow up visit is needed after the adjustment.
This study is expected to enroll about 300 Subjects from up to 20 sites in the United States.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved "Adjustment Complete" and a Consensus X-ray Reading [Day 1]
Up to 5 attempts to achieve "Adjustment Complete" using the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) system for each Subject. Agreement in 2 of 3 valve X-ray readings by independent radiologists for each Subject was considered "consensus X-ray". All participants included achieved "Adjustment Complete" and a "consensus X-ray reading".
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Agreement Between the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) System and Consensus X-rays Using Various Thresholds [Day 1]
Percentage of agreement between consensus X-ray readings and the intended setting programmed by the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) system. This was assessed at various steps (intervals of mmH20) as increments allow on the Codman Hakim Programmable Valve. (1 step = 10 mmH20, 2 steps = 20 mmH20, +2 steps = >20 mmH20)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
A CODMAN Hakim Programmable Valve (CHPV) has been implanted for the management of the Subject's Hydrocephalus.
-
The Subject has given written informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.
-
The Subject requires adjustment of the CODMAN Hakim Programmable Valve (CHPV) for the management of Hydrocephalus·
-
The Subject's implanted CHPV will be adjusted using the Implanted Valve Mode.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
The Subject's valve is located in the deep lumbar position.
-
The Subject has an open and/or recent wound site in the region of the implanted valve.
-
The Subject has a history of Ultrasound gel allergies.
-
The Subject is a prisoner.
-
The subject has been previously enrolled in this protocol.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | ||
2 | Orlando | Florida | United States | ||
3 | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 | |
4 | Newark | New Jersey | United States | ||
5 | New York | New York | United States | ||
6 | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | ||
7 | Portland | Oregon | United States | ||
8 | Richardson | Texas | United States |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Codman & Shurtleff
Investigators
- Study Director: J. Thomas Megerian, MD, Codman & Shurtleff
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- American Society of Radiologic Technologists, Statement on IOM Report, "To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System", www.asrt.org/other_categories/government_relations/iom_report.htm
- Bret P, Guyotat J, Ricci AC, Mottolese C, Jouanneau E. [Clinical experience with the Sp[hy adjustable valve in the treatment of adult hydrocephalus. A series of 147 cases]. Neurochirurgie. 1999 May;45(2):98-108; discussion 108-9. French.
- Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical Statistics at a Glance. Blackwell Science Ltd: 90-91
- Pollack IF, Albright AL, Adelson PD. A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Hakim-Medos Investigator Group. Neurosurgery. 1999 Dec;45(6):1399-408; discussion 1408-11.
- Rohde V, Mayfrank L, Ramakers VT, Gilsbach JM. Four-year experience with the routine use of the programmable Hakim valve in the management of children with hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(11):1127-34.
- Zemack G, Romner B. Seven years of clinical experience with the programmable Codman Hakim valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg. 2000 Jun;92(6):941-8.
- VPV-US03-001
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Subjects were enrolled between September 29, 2004 and October 13, 2006. Twelve (12) investigational sites within the US enrolled 274 Subjects. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Of the 274 Subjects enrolled, 5 were determined to be ineligible - did not have hydrocephalus, a required condition per inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two (2) Subjects withdrew early. Overall, 267 Subjects were eligible for analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Codman VPV System |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 274 |
COMPLETED | 267 |
NOT COMPLETED | 7 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Codman VPV System |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Overall Participants | 267 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
35
13.1%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
90
33.7%
|
>=65 years |
142
53.2%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
57
(26.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
137
51.3%
|
Male |
130
48.7%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
267
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved "Adjustment Complete" and a Consensus X-ray Reading |
---|---|
Description | Up to 5 attempts to achieve "Adjustment Complete" using the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) system for each Subject. Agreement in 2 of 3 valve X-ray readings by independent radiologists for each Subject was considered "consensus X-ray". All participants included achieved "Adjustment Complete" and a "consensus X-ray reading". |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Codman VPV System |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 267 |
Number [Percentage of participants] |
98.33
36.8%
|
Title | Percentage of Agreement Between the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) System and Consensus X-rays Using Various Thresholds |
---|---|
Description | Percentage of agreement between consensus X-ray readings and the intended setting programmed by the Codman Valve Position Verification (VPV) system. This was assessed at various steps (intervals of mmH20) as increments allow on the Codman Hakim Programmable Valve. (1 step = 10 mmH20, 2 steps = 20 mmH20, +2 steps = >20 mmH20) |
Time Frame | Day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Codman VPV System |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 267 |
Percentage of Agreement (exact match) |
63.89
|
Percentage of Agreement in 1 step (+/- 10 mmH20) |
96.11
|
Percentage of Agreement >2 steps (>20 mmH20) |
1.67
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Codman VPV System | |
Arm/Group Description | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||
Codman VPV System | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Codman VPV System | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Codman VPV System | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Jandira Ramos, MPH |
---|---|
Organization | Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. |
Phone | 508-828-3127 |
jramos8@its.jnj.com |
- VPV-US03-001