Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Sponsor
Hôpital de Verdun (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05497986
Collaborator
(none)
84
3
2
21
28
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Current evidence suggests a mechanistic and physiological rationale for the use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in acute respiratory hypoxemic failure (AHRF) based on physiological studies in airway models, healthy volunteers and patients with Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD). This is supported by observational studies in patients with AHRF with reductions in a range of respiratory and other physiological parameters. Observational studies also suggest similar intubation rates and lower failure rates with HFNC when compared to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with improved patient acceptance and tolerance for HFNC.

The role of HFNC is less clear in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Although non-invasive ventilation is the recommended treatment, it is associated with discomfort, and a significant proportion (up to 25% in some reports) cannot tolerate non-invasive ventilation. Observational reports and limited data from randomized controlled trials suggests that HFNC is effective in treating patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure.

We designed this trial to assess whether early application of HFNC in patients with non-severe hypercapnic respiratory failure can correct barometric abnormalities, and prevent progression to non-invasive ventilation or tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: High flow nasal cannula
  • Device: Conventional low flow oxygenation
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
84 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Due to the nature of the intervention, nor the participants, nor the treating physicians, nor the investigator can be blinded. However, the outcomes will be analyzed an independent statistician blinded to the treatment assignments.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: High Flow Nasal Cannula

Device: High flow nasal cannula
HFNC with the maximum tolerated flow (up to 60 L/min). Titration of supplemental oxygen to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
Other Names:
  • High flow oxygenation
  • High flow oxygen therapy
  • Active Comparator: Conventional Oxygenation with low flow cannula

    Device: Conventional low flow oxygenation
    Conventional oxygenation through nasal prongs or a facemask, with supplemental oxygen titrated to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Proportion of patients progressing to NIV in each cohort [6 hours]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Venous blood gas PCO2 [1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours]

    2. Venous blood gas pH [1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours]

    3. Respiratory rate [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completion]

      Number of breaths per minute, as documented in the medical chart

    4. Heart rate [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completion]

      Number of heart beats per minute, as documented in the medical chart

    5. Mean arterial pressure [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completion]

      Mean arterial pressure, as documented in the medical chart

    6. Incidence of intubation [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]

    7. Admission to the intensive care unit [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]

    8. In-hospital mortality [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]

    9. Intensive care unit length of stay [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until discharge from the intensive care unit]

    10. Hospital length of stay [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]

    11. Patient comfort [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until cessation of oxygen therapy, up to a maximum of 7 days]

      Level of comfort assessed on a visual analogue scale by the patient

    12. Shortness of breath [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until cessation of oxygen therapy, up to a maximum of 7 days]

      Severity of the shortness of breath assessed on a visual analogue scale by the patient

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adult patients > 18 years of age

    • Acute Hypercapnic respiratory failure with pH < 7.35 and pCO2 > 45 mmHg

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Pregnant or Breast-Feeding

    • Patients who cannot read and understand French or English

    • Hypercapnia secondary to a drug toxicity or non-pulmonary aetiology

    • Hypercapnia secondary to exacerbation of asthma

    • Contraindication to NIV

    • Contraindication to HFNC

    • Not for escalation to NIV based on a ceiling of care

    • pH < 7.15

    • GCS 8 or less

    • Shock defined as systolic < 90 mmHg or a reduction by 20mmHg from usual systolic BP despite volume resuscitation

    • Respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest

    • Any other indication that requires immediate invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 CISSS-de-la-Montérégie-Centre Longueuil Quebec Canada J4V 2H2
    2 CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'ïle-de-Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada H1T 2M4
    3 Hôpital de Verdun Montréal Quebec Canada H4G2A2

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hôpital de Verdun

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ivan Pavlov, M.D., CIUSSS-Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hôpital de Verdun
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05497986
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Verdun2022_01
    First Posted:
    Aug 11, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 11, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Hôpital de Verdun
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 11, 2022