Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Current evidence suggests a mechanistic and physiological rationale for the use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in acute respiratory hypoxemic failure (AHRF) based on physiological studies in airway models, healthy volunteers and patients with Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD). This is supported by observational studies in patients with AHRF with reductions in a range of respiratory and other physiological parameters. Observational studies also suggest similar intubation rates and lower failure rates with HFNC when compared to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with improved patient acceptance and tolerance for HFNC.
The role of HFNC is less clear in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Although non-invasive ventilation is the recommended treatment, it is associated with discomfort, and a significant proportion (up to 25% in some reports) cannot tolerate non-invasive ventilation. Observational reports and limited data from randomized controlled trials suggests that HFNC is effective in treating patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure.
We designed this trial to assess whether early application of HFNC in patients with non-severe hypercapnic respiratory failure can correct barometric abnormalities, and prevent progression to non-invasive ventilation or tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: High Flow Nasal Cannula
|
Device: High flow nasal cannula
HFNC with the maximum tolerated flow (up to 60 L/min). Titration of supplemental oxygen to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Oxygenation with low flow cannula
|
Device: Conventional low flow oxygenation
Conventional oxygenation through nasal prongs or a facemask, with supplemental oxygen titrated to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of patients progressing to NIV in each cohort [6 hours]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Venous blood gas PCO2 [1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours]
- Venous blood gas pH [1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours]
- Respiratory rate [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completion]
Number of breaths per minute, as documented in the medical chart
- Heart rate [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completion]
Number of heart beats per minute, as documented in the medical chart
- Mean arterial pressure [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until study completion]
Mean arterial pressure, as documented in the medical chart
- Incidence of intubation [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]
- Admission to the intensive care unit [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]
- In-hospital mortality [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]
- Intensive care unit length of stay [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until discharge from the intensive care unit]
- Hospital length of stay [Up to 90 days after enrolment, or until hospital discharge]
- Patient comfort [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until cessation of oxygen therapy, up to a maximum of 7 days]
Level of comfort assessed on a visual analogue scale by the patient
- Shortness of breath [1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and daily until cessation of oxygen therapy, up to a maximum of 7 days]
Severity of the shortness of breath assessed on a visual analogue scale by the patient
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adult patients > 18 years of age
-
Acute Hypercapnic respiratory failure with pH < 7.35 and pCO2 > 45 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnant or Breast-Feeding
-
Patients who cannot read and understand French or English
-
Hypercapnia secondary to a drug toxicity or non-pulmonary aetiology
-
Hypercapnia secondary to exacerbation of asthma
-
Contraindication to NIV
-
Contraindication to HFNC
-
Not for escalation to NIV based on a ceiling of care
-
pH < 7.15
-
GCS 8 or less
-
Shock defined as systolic < 90 mmHg or a reduction by 20mmHg from usual systolic BP despite volume resuscitation
-
Respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest
-
Any other indication that requires immediate invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CISSS-de-la-Montérégie-Centre | Longueuil | Quebec | Canada | J4V 2H2 |
2 | CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'ïle-de-Montréal | Montréal | Quebec | Canada | H1T 2M4 |
3 | Hôpital de Verdun | Montréal | Quebec | Canada | H4G2A2 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hôpital de Verdun
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ivan Pavlov, M.D., CIUSSS-Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Verdun2022_01