Hyperopic LASIK With Crosslinking Versus Standard LASIK

Sponsor
Minia University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03224013
Collaborator
(none)
25
2
17.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Analysis corneal and refractive stability of hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with and without concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking (CXL).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: LASIK
N/A

Detailed Description

Interventional prospective consecutive comparative case control series of cases; 50 eyes of 25 patients with mean age 35.7 ± 12.4 (Range 18-61years) with hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism underwent customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in right eye (group 1) and customized LASIK only in left eye (group 2). Cases with hyperopia +1 diopter to +6 diopters or hyperopic astigmatism up to 4 diopters were included in the study. Patients with previous intraocular or corneal surgery, active corneal disease were excluded from the study.

Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), cycloplegic refractive spherical equivalent (CRSE), keratometric measurements and spherical aberrations at 4 mm and maximum pupil and their evolution along 6 months postoperatively.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
25 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Interventional prospective consecutive comparative case control series of cases; 50 eyes of 25 patients with mean age 35.7 ± 12.4 (Range 18-61years) with hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism underwent customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in right eye (group 1) and customized LASIK only in left eye (group 2). Cases with hyperopia +1D to +6D or hyperopic astigmatism up to 4D were included in the study. Patients with previous intraocular or corneal surgery, active corneal disease were excluded from the study. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), cycloplegic refractive spherical equivalent (CRSE), keratometric measurments and spherical aberrations at 4 mm and maximum pupilnand their ecolution along 6 months postoperatively.Interventional prospective consecutive comparative case control series of cases; 50 eyes of 25 patients with mean age 35.7 ± 12.4 (Range 18-61years) with hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism underwent customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in right eye (group 1) and customized LASIK only in left eye (group 2). Cases with hyperopia +1D to +6D or hyperopic astigmatism up to 4D were included in the study. Patients with previous intraocular or corneal surgery, active corneal disease were excluded from the study. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), cycloplegic refractive spherical equivalent (CRSE), keratometric measurments and spherical aberrations at 4 mm and maximum pupilnand their ecolution along 6 months postoperatively.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Hyperopic LASIK With Concurrent Prophylactic High-fluence Cross-linking Versus Standard LASIK Outcomes
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 18, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 12, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 12, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Hyperopic LASIK with crosslinking

group 1:hyperopic customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking

Procedure: LASIK
LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high fluence crosslinking in right eye ( After the excimer laser ablation, and with the flap folded onto itself and protected with a dry sponge, one drop of Vibex Rapid™ , consisting of 0.10% saline-diluted riboflavin (a very slightly hypotonic solution, mixed with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, a dextran substitute), was placed on the exposed stromal bed afforded by the open LASIK flap and carefully spread over the bed area with an irrigating cannula for 60 seconds and LASIK only in left eye

Active Comparator: Hyperopic LASIK only

group 2: hyperopic customized LASIK only

Procedure: LASIK
LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high fluence crosslinking in right eye ( After the excimer laser ablation, and with the flap folded onto itself and protected with a dry sponge, one drop of Vibex Rapid™ , consisting of 0.10% saline-diluted riboflavin (a very slightly hypotonic solution, mixed with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, a dextran substitute), was placed on the exposed stromal bed afforded by the open LASIK flap and carefully spread over the bed area with an irrigating cannula for 60 seconds and LASIK only in left eye

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. assessment of changes in refractive spherical equivalent [preoperative and 3 months and 6 months postoperative]

    assessment of changes in manifest refraction by autorefractometer and then calculate spherical equivalent

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 61 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Cases with hyperopia +1diopter to +6 diopters or hyperopic astigmatism up to 4 diopters
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with previous intraocular or corneal surgery, active corneal disease

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Minia University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jorge L Alio, MD, MD, Phd, FEBO

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ahemd Abdelghany, Lecturer of Ophthalmology.Faculty of Medicine, Minia University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03224013
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Hyperopic LASIK
First Posted:
Jul 21, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jul 21, 2017
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 21, 2017