An Examination of the Blood Pressure Lowering Ability and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Patients With Type II Diabetes

Sponsor
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00403481
Collaborator
(none)
192
27
1
13
7.1
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will examine the ability of olmesartan medoxomil to lower the blood pressure of patients with Type II diabetes and high blood pressure. The medication being tested has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of high blood pressure.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: olmesartan medoxomil
  • Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil plus Hydrochlorothiazide
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
192 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Prospective, Open Label, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Olmesartan Medoxomil Based Treatment Regimen in Type II Diabetic Patients With Hypertension
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2007
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2007

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Active treatment

Blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken every three weeks for 12 weeks. In accordance with their BP results, participants either stayed on their current medication or were started on the next higher regimen at the 3, 6, or 9 week visits. All participants began at 20 mg olmesartan, once daily for 3 weeks. The next higher regimen was olmesartan 40 mg, followed by olmesartan 40 mg + 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, followed by olmesartan 40 mg + 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide.

Drug: olmesartan medoxomil
Olmesartan medoxomil tablets, once daily

Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil plus Hydrochlorothiazide
Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide combination tablets, once daily, if necessary

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic BP (SBP) as Measured by 24-hour ABPM. [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (Systolic). [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 4 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 6 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  6. Change in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  7. Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 Weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

  8. Change in Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last (Week 12 ) 4 and 6 Hours of the Last 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]

    Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients diagnosed with Type II diabetes that are on stable treatment with hypoglycemic agents

  • Patients with a mean seated systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) greater than or equal to 140 mmHg but <200 mmHg and a MSDBP less than or equal to 114 mmHg following a 3 to 4-week single-blind placebo run-in period

  • The difference in MSSBP between Visits 3 and 4 or between Visits 4 and 4X must be less than or equal to 10 mmHg

  • Patients with a mean daytime (8AM - 4PM) SBP > 130 mmHg and less than or equal to 199 mmHg and a mean daytime DBP less than or equal to 114 as measured by an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (ABPM) following placebo run-in period

  • If female, must have negative serum pregnancy test at screening and be either post-menopausal, had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 months before consent or if of childbearing potential, must practice approved measures of birth control throughout study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the last one year

  • History of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft, and/or unstable angina pectoris within the past 6 months

  • Presence of overt proteinuria at screening

  • Severe hypertension (DBP greater than or equal to 115 mmHg or SBP greater than or equal to 200 mmHg)

  • Patients with secondary hypertension of any etiology, such as renal disease, pheochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome

  • Type I or Type II diabetes requiring insulin

  • Evidence of symptomatic resting bradycardia, congestive heart failure, or hemodynamically significant cardiac valvular disease

  • Presence of heart block greater than first degree sinoatrial block, Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Atrial fibrillation, or Atrial Flutter

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Birmingham Alabama United States
2 Mesa Arizona United States
3 Searcy Arkansas United States
4 Los Angeles California United States
5 Roseville California United States
6 Tustin California United States
7 Deland Florida United States
8 Pembroke Pines Florida United States
9 Chicago Illinois United States
10 Wichita Kansas United States
11 Madisonville Kentucky United States
12 Auburn Maine United States
13 Baltimore Maryland United States
14 Oxon Hill Maryland United States
15 Jackson Mississippi United States
16 Florissant Missouri United States
17 Williamsville New York United States
18 Charlotte North Carolina United States
19 Winston-Salem North Carolina United States
20 Cincinnati Ohio United States
21 New Talenwell Tennessee United States
22 New Tazewell Tennessee United States
23 Colleyville Texas United States
24 Corpus Christi Texas United States
25 Richardson Texas United States
26 Murray Utah United States
27 Norfolk Virginia United States

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00403481
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 866-449
First Posted:
Nov 23, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Nov 3, 2016
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2016

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Subjects were recruited at 24 US sites over 10 months from November 2006 to August 2007 from each physician's clientele base. Approximately 200 eligible subjects, men and women at least 18 years of age with stage I/II hypertension and stable type 2 diabetes mellitus, were to be enrolled on active treatment.
Pre-assignment Detail 192 participants started this single arm titration study. Participants remained in their group or were titrated at 3-week intervals depending on achievement their blood pressure goals.
Arm/Group Title Active Treatment Period
Arm/Group Description All participants started this arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled.
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg
STARTED 192
COMPLETED 186
NOT COMPLETED 6
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg
STARTED 182
COMPLETED 177
NOT COMPLETED 5
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg
STARTED 173
COMPLETED 168
NOT COMPLETED 5
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg
STARTED 144
COMPLETED 142
NOT COMPLETED 2

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Active Treatmant Arm
Arm/Group Description All participants started this arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled.
Overall Participants 192
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
58.1
(10.3)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
85
44.3%
Male
107
55.7%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number]
Black/African American
43
22.4%
Asian
3
1.6%
White
145
75.5%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
1
0.5%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
192
100%
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg]
90.0
(10.0)
Heart rate (beats/min) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [beats/min]
76.4
(10.4)
Systolic BP (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg]
158.1
(12.6)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic BP (SBP) as Measured by 24-hour ABPM.
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 172
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg]
-20.4
(0.88)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments No multiplicity adjustments
Method One-sample t-test
Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (Systolic).
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 172
Daytime
-22.3
(1.05)
Nighttime
-18.8
(0.94)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments <0.0001 for both daytime and nighttime. No multiplicity adjustments.
Method one-sample t-test
Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12) 24-hour Dosing Period.
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 169 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 169
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg]
-18.6
(1.11)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method One-sample t-test
Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 4 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 171 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 171
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg]
-18.2
(1.00)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0001
Comments No multiplicity adjustments
Method one-sample t-test
Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 6 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 171 had the required measurements
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 171
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg]
-18.6
(0.92)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory BP (Diastolic)
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 172
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg]
-11.1
(0.54)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method one-sample t-test
Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 172
Daytime
-12.0
(0.68)
Nighttime
-10.2
(0.55)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments <0.0001 applies to both the daytime and nighttime analyses
Method one-sample t-test
Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 Weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.Of the 172 participants, only 169 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 169
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg]
-10.6
(0.78)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method one-sample t-test
Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Change in Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last (Week 12 ) 4 and 6 Hours of the Last 24-hour Dosing Period.
Description Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Time Frame baseline and 12 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 171 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis.
Arm/Group Title Overall Study Population
Arm/Group Description
Measure Participants 171
4 hours
-10.7
(0.66)
6 hours
-10.8
(0.61)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Overall Study Population
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments <0.0001 applies to both 4 hour and 6 hour analyses
Method one-sample t-test
Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame 12 week treatment period plus 30 days after the last dose of study medication.
Adverse Event Reporting Description Safety assessments included physical examination, reporting of adverse events, and changes in laboratory values. At each visit, the investigator determined whether any adverse events had occurred by evaluating the subject. Subjects were to be questioned in a general way, without asking about the occurrence of any specific symptoms.
Arm/Group Title Olmesartan 20 mg Olmesartan 40 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg
Arm/Group Description All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled
All Cause Mortality
Olmesartan 20 mg Olmesartan 40 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Olmesartan 20 mg Olmesartan 40 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/192 (0%) 0/182 (0%) 1/173 (0.6%) 0/144 (0%)
General disorders
Death due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease 0/192 (0%) 0/182 (0%) 1/173 (0.6%) 0/144 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Olmesartan 20 mg Olmesartan 40 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 4/192 (2.1%) 5/182 (2.7%) 3/173 (1.7%) 6/144 (4.2%)
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis 3/192 (1.6%) 3/182 (1.6%) 0/173 (0%) 0/144 (0%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 1/192 (0.5%) 2/182 (1.1%) 2/173 (1.2%) 3/144 (2.1%)
Pain in extremity 0/192 (0%) 0/182 (0%) 1/173 (0.6%) 3/144 (2.1%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

If identified by Daiichi Sankyo Inc., any of DSI's confidential information, as defined to the author, shall be deleted. Nothing in our site agreement shall be taken as giving Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. any right of editorial control over any publication prepared by the study site.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title John J. Raia, R.Ph, Pharm. D.
Organization Daiichi Sankyo
Phone 1-877-437-7763
Email druginfo@dsus.com
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00403481
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 866-449
First Posted:
Nov 23, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Nov 3, 2016
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2016