An Examination of the Blood Pressure Lowering Ability and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Patients With Type II Diabetes
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will examine the ability of olmesartan medoxomil to lower the blood pressure of patients with Type II diabetes and high blood pressure. The medication being tested has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of high blood pressure.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Active treatment Blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken every three weeks for 12 weeks. In accordance with their BP results, participants either stayed on their current medication or were started on the next higher regimen at the 3, 6, or 9 week visits. All participants began at 20 mg olmesartan, once daily for 3 weeks. The next higher regimen was olmesartan 40 mg, followed by olmesartan 40 mg + 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, followed by olmesartan 40 mg + 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. |
Drug: olmesartan medoxomil
Olmesartan medoxomil tablets, once daily
Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil plus Hydrochlorothiazide
Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide combination tablets, once daily, if necessary
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic BP (SBP) as Measured by 24-hour ABPM. [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (Systolic). [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 4 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 6 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 Weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
- Change in Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last (Week 12 ) 4 and 6 Hours of the Last 24-hour Dosing Period. [baseline and 12 weeks]
Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients diagnosed with Type II diabetes that are on stable treatment with hypoglycemic agents
-
Patients with a mean seated systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) greater than or equal to 140 mmHg but <200 mmHg and a MSDBP less than or equal to 114 mmHg following a 3 to 4-week single-blind placebo run-in period
-
The difference in MSSBP between Visits 3 and 4 or between Visits 4 and 4X must be less than or equal to 10 mmHg
-
Patients with a mean daytime (8AM - 4PM) SBP > 130 mmHg and less than or equal to 199 mmHg and a mean daytime DBP less than or equal to 114 as measured by an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (ABPM) following placebo run-in period
-
If female, must have negative serum pregnancy test at screening and be either post-menopausal, had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 months before consent or if of childbearing potential, must practice approved measures of birth control throughout study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
History of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the last one year
-
History of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft, and/or unstable angina pectoris within the past 6 months
-
Presence of overt proteinuria at screening
-
Severe hypertension (DBP greater than or equal to 115 mmHg or SBP greater than or equal to 200 mmHg)
-
Patients with secondary hypertension of any etiology, such as renal disease, pheochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome
-
Type I or Type II diabetes requiring insulin
-
Evidence of symptomatic resting bradycardia, congestive heart failure, or hemodynamically significant cardiac valvular disease
-
Presence of heart block greater than first degree sinoatrial block, Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Atrial fibrillation, or Atrial Flutter
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | ||
2 | Mesa | Arizona | United States | ||
3 | Searcy | Arkansas | United States | ||
4 | Los Angeles | California | United States | ||
5 | Roseville | California | United States | ||
6 | Tustin | California | United States | ||
7 | Deland | Florida | United States | ||
8 | Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States | ||
9 | Chicago | Illinois | United States | ||
10 | Wichita | Kansas | United States | ||
11 | Madisonville | Kentucky | United States | ||
12 | Auburn | Maine | United States | ||
13 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | ||
14 | Oxon Hill | Maryland | United States | ||
15 | Jackson | Mississippi | United States | ||
16 | Florissant | Missouri | United States | ||
17 | Williamsville | New York | United States | ||
18 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | ||
19 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | ||
20 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | ||
21 | New Talenwell | Tennessee | United States | ||
22 | New Tazewell | Tennessee | United States | ||
23 | Colleyville | Texas | United States | ||
24 | Corpus Christi | Texas | United States | ||
25 | Richardson | Texas | United States | ||
26 | Murray | Utah | United States | ||
27 | Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 866-449
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Subjects were recruited at 24 US sites over 10 months from November 2006 to August 2007 from each physician's clientele base. Approximately 200 eligible subjects, men and women at least 18 years of age with stage I/II hypertension and stable type 2 diabetes mellitus, were to be enrolled on active treatment. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 192 participants started this single arm titration study. Participants remained in their group or were titrated at 3-week intervals depending on achievement their blood pressure goals. |
Arm/Group Title | Active Treatment Period |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants started this arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. |
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg | |
STARTED | 192 |
COMPLETED | 186 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 |
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg | |
STARTED | 182 |
COMPLETED | 177 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 |
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg | |
STARTED | 173 |
COMPLETED | 168 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 |
Period Title: Olmesartan Medoxomil (Olm) 20 mg | |
STARTED | 144 |
COMPLETED | 142 |
NOT COMPLETED | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Active Treatmant Arm |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants started this arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. |
Overall Participants | 192 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
58.1
(10.3)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
85
44.3%
|
Male |
107
55.7%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number] | |
Black/African American |
43
22.4%
|
Asian |
3
1.6%
|
White |
145
75.5%
|
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander |
1
0.5%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
192
100%
|
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg] |
90.0
(10.0)
|
Heart rate (beats/min) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [beats/min] |
76.4
(10.4)
|
Systolic BP (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg] |
158.1
(12.6)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic BP (SBP) as Measured by 24-hour ABPM. |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 172 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg] |
-20.4
(0.88)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | No multiplicity adjustments | |
Method | One-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (Systolic). |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 172 |
Daytime |
-22.3
(1.05)
|
Nighttime |
-18.8
(0.94)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | <0.0001 for both daytime and nighttime. No multiplicity adjustments. | |
Method | one-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12) 24-hour Dosing Period. |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 169 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 169 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg] |
-18.6
(1.11)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | One-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 4 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 171 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 171 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg] |
-18.2
(1.00)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0001 |
Comments | No multiplicity adjustments | |
Method | one-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 6 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 171 had the required measurements |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 171 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg] |
-18.6
(0.92)
|
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 172 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg] |
-11.1
(0.54)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | one-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 172 |
Daytime |
-12.0
(0.68)
|
Nighttime |
-10.2
(0.55)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | <0.0001 applies to both the daytime and nighttime analyses | |
Method | one-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period. |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 Weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM.Of the 172 participants, only 169 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 169 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mm Hg] |
-10.6
(0.78)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | one-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last (Week 12 ) 4 and 6 Hours of the Last 24-hour Dosing Period. |
---|---|
Description | Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. |
Time Frame | baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
A total of 192 participants started. Eighteen dropped out. All Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Subjects (N=172) consisted of all subjects in the efficacy cohort who had a baseline and week 12 ABPM. Of the 172 ABPM participants, only 171 had the required measurements for this outcome analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 171 |
4 hours |
-10.7
(0.66)
|
6 hours |
-10.8
(0.61)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Overall Study Population |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | <0.0001 applies to both 4 hour and 6 hour analyses | |
Method | one-sample t-test | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 12 week treatment period plus 30 days after the last dose of study medication. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Safety assessments included physical examination, reporting of adverse events, and changes in laboratory values. At each visit, the investigator determined whether any adverse events had occurred by evaluating the subject. Subjects were to be questioned in a general way, without asking about the occurrence of any specific symptoms. | |||||||
Arm/Group Title | Olmesartan 20 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg | ||||
Arm/Group Description | All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. | All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled | All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled | All participants started with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). After 3 weeks participants were titrated to 40g Olm, if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 6 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled. After 9 weeks they were titrated to the next step which now included Olm + HCTZ 25 mg if their blood pressure was not controlled | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Olmesartan 20 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Olmesartan 20 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/192 (0%) | 0/182 (0%) | 1/173 (0.6%) | 0/144 (0%) | ||||
General disorders | ||||||||
Death due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease | 0/192 (0%) | 0/182 (0%) | 1/173 (0.6%) | 0/144 (0%) | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Olmesartan 20 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg | Olmesartan 40 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 4/192 (2.1%) | 5/182 (2.7%) | 3/173 (1.7%) | 6/144 (4.2%) | ||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Bronchitis | 3/192 (1.6%) | 3/182 (1.6%) | 0/173 (0%) | 0/144 (0%) | ||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Arthralgia | 1/192 (0.5%) | 2/182 (1.1%) | 2/173 (1.2%) | 3/144 (2.1%) | ||||
Pain in extremity | 0/192 (0%) | 0/182 (0%) | 1/173 (0.6%) | 3/144 (2.1%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
If identified by Daiichi Sankyo Inc., any of DSI's confidential information, as defined to the author, shall be deleted. Nothing in our site agreement shall be taken as giving Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. any right of editorial control over any publication prepared by the study site.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | John J. Raia, R.Ph, Pharm. D. |
---|---|
Organization | Daiichi Sankyo |
Phone | 1-877-437-7763 |
druginfo@dsus.com |
- 866-449