Improving BP Control in Diverse Populations Using BP MAP

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03818659
Collaborator
OCHIN, Inc. (Other), Louisiana Public Health Institute (Other), American Medical Association (Other), American Heart Association (Other)
24
24
3
29
1
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

BP-MAP is a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the effectiveness of BP lowering from a clinic-based quality improvement program with Full Support (dedicated practice facilitation) vs. a Self-Guided version of the program. The American Medical Association (AMA) developed the framework for the interventions.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Self-Guided M.A.P. BP Improvement Program
  • Other: Full Support M.A.P. BP Improvement Program
N/A

Detailed Description

BP-MAP is a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the effectiveness of BP lowering from a clinic-based quality improvement program with Full Support (dedicated practice facilitation) vs. a Self-Guided version of the program. The American Medical Association (AMA) developed the framework for the interventions. The trial will be conducted within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) that enables distributed querying of electronic health record data in a common data model. The primary outcome will be change in clinic-level blood pressure (BP) control at 6 months. Secondary outcomes will include other blood pressure (BP) control metrics, other time points (12 and 18 months), and process measures such as BP measurement accuracy, medication intensification, and average systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction after a medication intensification, and repeat visit within 4 weeks after a visit with elevated BP. The investigators hypothesize clinics randomized to the Full Support version will achieve a larger increase from baseline in the proportion of their hypertensive patients with controlled BP at 6 months as compared to clinics randomized to the Self-Guided version, and also as compared with usual care. The investigators will also conduct non-randomized comparisons of BP control in the Full Support and Self-Guided intervention arms to BP control in non-participating "Usual Care" institutions in PCORnet. This study was submitted to the IRB at UCSF, determined to be quality improvement and exempt from further review.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
24 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Improving Blood Pressure Control in Diverse Populations by Measuring Accurately, Acting Rapidly, and Partnering With Patients
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Self-Guided

Active Clinics randomized to the Self-Guided Arm will receive access to an AHA/AMA web platform that includes the posted M.A.P. materials and limited access to AMA Staff who are available to answer questions. The study team will facilitate access to staff by hosting a kick-off webinar for program participants that will include an orientation to the materials on the website, general advice and practical tips about what works for implementation, and time for answering questions and discussion with the group.

Other: Self-Guided M.A.P. BP Improvement Program
Active Clinics randomized to the Self-Guided Arm will receive access to an AHA/AMA web platform that includes the posted M.A.P. materials and limited access to AMA Staff who are available to answer questions. The study team will facilitate access to staff by hosting a kick-off webinar for program participants that will include an orientation to the materials on the website, general advice and practical tips about what works for implementation, and time for answering questions and discussion with the group.

Experimental: Full Support

Active Clinics randomized to the Full Support Arm will receive online access to M.A.P. materials and orientation webinar and also a Practice Change Facilitator who will lead the health center clinical staff, site champions and physician leads at each clinic over the course of 6 months to support the implementation of the MAP Program. With support from an AMA "Improvement Advisor", the Practice Change Facilitators will perform a baseline assessment of current workflows and assess each domain of M.A.P. The goal of the Full Support program is to help care teams develop skills and sustainable workflows that are effective at attaining and maintaining high levels of BP control.

Other: Full Support M.A.P. BP Improvement Program
Active Clinics randomized to the Full Support Arm will receive online access to M.A.P. materials and orientation webinar and also a Practice Change Facilitator who will lead the health center clinical staff, site champions and physician leads at each clinic over the course of 6 months to support the implementation of the MAP Program. With support from an AMA "Improvement Advisor", the Practice Change Facilitators will perform a baseline assessment of current workflows and assess each domain of M.A.P. The goal of the Full Support program is to help care teams develop skills and sustainable workflows that are effective at attaining and maintaining high levels of BP control.

No Intervention: Usual Care

The investigators will also conduct non-randomized comparisons of BP control in the Full Support and Self-Guided intervention arms to BP control in non-participating "Usual Care" institutions in PCORnet.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in % Blood Pressure Control [6 months]

    The primary outcome will be clinic-level change in the proportion of patients with controlled BP from baseline to 6 months after the start of the intervention. BP control will be defined according to NQF 0018 as the percent of eligible patients (defined below) with SBP <140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg, based on measurements obtained at the most recent ambulatory clinical encounter at baseline (using the lowest measures of SBP and DBP at that encounter) and similarly at the 6-month time point after initiation of the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Medication intensification, % of visits [6 months]

    This process measure captures the proportion of visits where BP is uncontrolled where a medication is ordered that is of a different class of medication than had previously been used. Note that this explicitly does not give credit for ordering a simple refill or medication dose increase, or use of a different medication in the same class.

  2. Confirmatory repeated blood pressure measurement, % of visits [6 months]

    This process measure is designed to capture the practice of repeating a blood pressure measurement in the same visit when the first measurement done in clinic is high (SBP≥140 mmHg or DBP≥90 mmHg).

  3. Average Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) reduction after a medication intensification visit, mmHg [6 months]

    This continuous metric describes the change in SBP observed between a visit with a medication intensification to the subsequent visit. Note that Metric 11 (added later) is the standard deviation of the same measurements.

  4. Improvement in Blood Pressure, % of patients [6 months]

    This overall measure of BP improvement implements CMS065v4[ref], which defines BP improvement as either a reduction of 10 mmHg in SBP or achievement of SBP that is "adequately controlled" (SBP < 140 mmHg) in months 10-12 of the measurement period, among hypertensive patients not previously controlled.

  5. Use of fixed dose combination product among patients taking 2 or more classes of medications, % of patients [6 months]

    Use of fixed dose combination medications helps with adherence, promotes rational combinations of medications, and increases likelihood of achieving BP control. This metric, which is limited to patients taking more than one medication class, describes the prevalence of fixed dose combination pill use.

  6. Use of a CCB or thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic among African-American patients on at least one medication, % of patients [6 months]

    Use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) OR a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic medication classes is recommended to treat black or African American patients as first line monotherapy due to increased efficacy. This metric, which is limited to African-American patients with a diagnosis of hypertension taking at least one medication class, describes the prevalence of those receiving the recommended drug class.

  7. Terminal digit = zero, % of measurements [6 months]

    Inappropriate rounding of blood pressure measurements (usually to zero) leads to measurement error and worse treatment decisions. This metric is designed to catch this behavior, which would lead to a terminal digit of zero of greater than 10% (if an automated BP monitor is used) or greater than 20% (if a manual BP monitor is used with recommended rounding to even digits). Unlike most of our metrics, lower is better, down to an ideal value of 10-20%, which would be expected if no rounding were occurring.

  8. Repeat visit in 4 weeks after a visit with uncontrolled HTN, % of visits [6 months]

    This process measure captures the proportion of persons who had uncontrolled HTN who made a subsequent visit within the following 4 weeks.

  9. Blood Pressure Controlled to 2017 Guideline Goal, % of patients [6 months]

    This alternative overall measure of BP control is identical to Metric 1, except that attainment of BP Control is defined by SBP < 130 mmHg and DBP < 80 mmHg, as per the goal stated in the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline[ref]. Note that while the treatment threshold varies in the Guideline, depending on cardiovascular risk, the goal applies to all patients.

  10. Standard deviation of SBP reduction after a medication intensification visit, mmHg [6 months]

    This continuous metric describes the standard deviation of the change in SBP observed between a visit with a medication intensification to the subsequent visit. Note that Metric 4 is the average of the same measurements.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No

ACTIVE CLINICS

For inclusion as an Active Clinic in this study, clinics may participate must be able to identify:

  • A Site Champion who works at the clinic and who is willing to take primary responsibility for implementing the M.A.P. intervention

  • A Physician Champion who works at the clinic and who is willing to advocate actively for the M.A.P. intervention

  • A Practice Change Facilitator willing to attend a 1-day training and help guide implementation of the M.A.P intervention for Full Support sites, with the support of AMA staff (may be the Site Champion or Physician Champion, or a person with regional responsibilities who can support multiple sites)

Sites will be excluded if they:
  • Have implemented any high blood pressure quality improvement component from the M.A.P. BP improvement program as part of Target: BP or from the AMA or Target: BP websites

  • Are currently involved in an ongoing clinical trial or grant funded project related to high blood pressure or hypertension

USUAL CARE CLINICS:

Usual Care Clinics will include PCORnet Datamarts participating in BP TRACK, a concurrently-running BP Control Registry within PCORnet that will provide quarterly datamart-level estimates of BP control and other aggregate metrics relevant to BP control.

All participating datamarts will be included, with the following exceptions:
  • Datamarts with any Active Clinics participating in BP MAP will be excluded

  • Datamarts that obscure dates via date-shifting will be excluded, as this will not allow for control of concurrent secular trends

PATIENTS

Within clinics (Active or Usual Care), patients will be eligible (and identified from the electronic health record) if they meet National Quality Forum BP Control Metric (NQF 0018) criteria:

  • Age 18-85 on the date of analysis

  • At least one outpatient encounter with a diagnosis of hypertension during the first six months of the measurement year (ending on the date of analysis)

  • No diagnosis or evidence of end-stage renal disease on or prior to the end of the measurement year

  • No pregnancy during the measurement year

  • No admission to an inpatient setting during the measurement year

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Open Door Del Norte CHC Crescent City California United States 95531
2 Open Door Eureka Community Health & Wellness Center Eureka California United States 95501
3 QueensCare Echo Park Clinic Los Angeles California United States 90026
4 Monterey County Health Department Laurel Family Practice Salinas California United States 93906
5 Belle Chasse Community Health Center Belle Chasse Louisiana United States 70037
6 Daughters of Charity Carrollton Carrollton Louisiana United States 70118
7 St. Bernard Community Health Center Chalmette Louisiana United States 70043
8 Daughters of Charity Gretna Gretna Louisiana United States 70056
9 Daughters of Charity Kenner Kenner Louisiana United States 70065
10 Kenner Community Health Center Kenner Louisiana United States 70065
11 St Charles Community Health Center- Paul Maillard Luling Louisiana United States 70070
12 St. Charles Community Health Center Luling Louisiana United States 70070
13 Daughters of Charity Metairie Metairie Louisiana United States 70001
14 Daughters of Charity St. Cecilia New Orleans Louisiana United States 700117
15 Daughters of Charity Higgins New Orleans Louisiana United States 700126
16 Daughters of Charity New Orleans East New Orleans Louisiana United States 700127
17 Access Health Louisiana Primary Care at the Pythian New Orleans Louisiana United States 70112
18 Daughters of Charity Gentilly New Orleans Louisiana United States 70122
19 Waterfall CHC N. Bend Oregon United States 97459
20 Tillamook CHC Tillamook Oregon United States 97141
21 Public Health: Seattle & King County Eastgate Public Health Center Bellevue Washington United States 98007
22 Public Health: Seattle & King County Primary Care at Navos Burien Washington United States 98166
23 Cowlitz County Health Department Cowlitz County: North Beach Clinic Longview Washington United States 98632
24 Public Health: Seattle & King County Downtown Public Health Center Seattle Washington United States 98121

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of California, San Francisco
  • OCHIN, Inc.
  • Louisiana Public Health Institute
  • American Medical Association
  • American Heart Association

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Pletcher, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03818659
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 18-25890
First Posted:
Jan 28, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Oct 26, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 26, 2021