CALCIMIP: Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Tolerability and Efficacy of Microencapsulated Calcium Carbonate
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Interventional Clinical trial with food supplement, randomized, double-blind, comparative between microencapsulated calcium, calcium carbonate salts standardized and calcium citrate, in a population of postmenopausal women, lasting 1 month.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Calcium supplement 10/90 Microencapsulated calcium, 1389 mg orally (10% protein and 90% calcium carbonate, corresponding to 500 mg of calcium element per tablet). There will be 2 doses of 1389 mg each orally, to make a total contribution of 1,000 mg. of calcium element. |
Dietary Supplement: Calcium supplement
Calcium supplement for low contribution of elemental calcium in the daily diet
|
Experimental: Calcium supplement 5/95 Microencapsulated calcium1316 mg orally (5% protein and 95% calcium carbonate, corresponding to 500 mg of calcium element per tablet). There will be 2 shots of 1,316 mg each orally, to make a total contribution of 1,000 mg. calcium element |
Dietary Supplement: Calcium supplement
Calcium supplement for low contribution of elemental calcium in the daily diet
|
Active Comparator: Calcium carbonate supplement 1,250 mg orally (500 mg of calcium element). There will be 2 doses of 1,250 mg. each orally, to make a total contribution of 1,000 mg. of calcium element. |
Dietary Supplement: Calcium supplement
Calcium supplement for low contribution of elemental calcium in the daily diet
|
Active Comparator: Calcium citrate supplement 1,500 mg orally (315 mg of calcium element). There will be 2 taken orally, to make a total contribution of 945 mg. calcium element |
Dietary Supplement: Calcium supplement
Calcium supplement for low contribution of elemental calcium in the daily diet
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Gastric symptoms [1 month]
Using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GRS). The scale measures constipation, diarrhea, windiness, swelling, nausea, reflux, pain and burning. The patient will have to choose the most appropriate response among those proposed. "Not at all" is the better outcome and "very strong discomfort" is the worst outcome
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Changes in bone markers [Basal and 1 month]
Bone Marker Analysis (CTx and P1NP) will be performed
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Postmenopausal woman
-
Low contribution of elemental calcium in the daily diet
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients
-
Renal insufficiency
-
History of kidney or urinary stones
-
Use in the last month of diuretics (furosemide, ethacrynic acid), aluminum salts and / or thyroid hormones
-
Use of any other drug or experimental device during the 30 days prior to the selection
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Instituto Palacios | Madrid | Spain | 28009 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Instituto Palacios
- Nexentia S.A.S.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Santiago Palacios, PI, Instituto Palacios
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CALCIMIP18