Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods

Sponsor
University of Aarhus (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01306734
Collaborator
Aarhus University Hospital (Other)
20
1
21.1
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

PURPOSE: To compare crash cooling versus gradient cooling methods for patients undergoing planned surgery on the ascending aorta in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. To investigate the impact of hypothermia and circulatory arrest on the coagulation, stress-response, and cerebral outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cooling to 18 °C using extracorporeal circulation allows for circulatory arrest during surgery on the ascending aorta. Two different methods are used either lowering the temperature of the blood by 10 °C at a time, gradient cooling, or as cold as possible, crash cooling. The distribution of hypothermia is expected to be different for the two methods, the latter predominantly cooling the body core. The influence on the physiological response is expected to vary with the two methods. The surgical procedure and the cooling greatly elicit a stress response and the coagulation is profoundly influenced. There can be adverse effects on the neurological outcome due to the procedure. The two methods are considered equal, but have never been subjected to comparison. The surgery and circulatory changes can have a negative influence on the cerebral outcome .

METHODS: Twenty patients between 18 and 80 yrs randomized either to crash cooling or gradient cooling, ten patients in each group.. Patients with severe comorbidities or known coagulopathy are excluded. Anesthesia and operation as performed routinely in the department. The primary endpoint is duration of cooling, secondary endpoints include coagulation parameters (thromboelastography, clot stability), stress response parameters (adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells, oxidative stress analysis, inflammatory markers), neuropsychological tests, MRI of the cerebrum, markers of cerebral ischemia, and ultrasound imaging of the great vessels for detection of air bubbles. Baseline values are obtained for all parameters.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    20 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods
    Study Start Date :
    Mar 1, 2011
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Sep 1, 2012
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Dec 1, 2012

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    Gradient cooling group

    Study group receiving gradient cooling during the procedure using extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The procedure is used routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. A maximum of 10 degrees celsius is allowed between the measured nasopharyngeal body temperature and the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine, when cooling or rewarming.

    Crash cooling group

    Study group receiving rapid cooling using extracorporeal circulation. The protocol for rapid cooling is using routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. When cooling, the investigators aim for maximal difference in temperature between the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Duration of cooling [intraoperatively]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. MRI of cerebrum [Baseline prior to surgery and 4 to 5 days postoperatively]

      Standard perfusion-weighed Magnetic Resonance imaging of the cerebrum. The same investigator describes all images. No use of contrast agents.

    2. Markers of neurological injury [baseline, postoperative]

      s-100b, Neuron specific enolase

    3. neurological exam [baseline, postoperative, after 4 months]

    4. cognitive test [baseline, postoperative, after 4 months]

    5. markers of elevated inflammatory response [perioperatively]

    6. Markers of oxidative stress [perioperatively]

    7. Coagulation parameters [perioperatively]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients scheduled for surgery on the ascending aorta

    • Need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during the procedure

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known coagulopathy

    • Ejection fraction less than 30 %

    • Severe psychiatric or neurological disease

    • Severe liver disease

    • Severely reduced lung function

    • Glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Department of anesthesia and intensive care, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Aarhus Aarhus N Denmark 8200

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Aarhus
    • Aarhus University Hospital

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Aarhus
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01306734
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • HYPO-SKS-2011
    First Posted:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2012

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 21, 2012