Comparison of Home-based Video, Paper/Print Checklist and Professional Home Assessment in Detection of Fall Hazards at Home

Sponsor
McMaster University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02775604
Collaborator
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation (Other)
80
1
2
18.8
4.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and potential impact of video analysis of footage taken with a GoPro camera video in comparison to a homeowner checklist or gold standard home assessment as a means of detecting home fall hazards.

Investigators hypothesize that the assessment of homes for fall hazards with a GoPro camera will be better than a homeowner paper checklist in hazard identification.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Video based/Therapists' rating of comprehensive-home-fall-hazard-checklist (vt-CHFHC)
  • Behavioral: Paper based/Patient self-rating of comprehensive-home-fall-hazard-checklist (pp-CHFHC)
N/A

Detailed Description

80 community-dwelling adults (50-75 years of age) will be recruited from clinics and the community through posters and advertising (n = 40 in the Healthy Group; n = 40 in the Distal Radius Fracture (DRF) Group (adults with 3-12 months post-DRF)).

Participants will be randomly allocated to a homeowner paper checklist or a GoPro video assessment and then cross-over to the opposite intervention.

To assess accuracy, a gold standard home assessment will be completed by a trained evaluator, after the homeowner checklist and GoPro video assessment.

Upon completion of the data collection, the evaluator will conduct their assessment (gold standard); review the findings from the GoPro "playback" with the participant, and conduct a semi-structured interview on their prior awareness of fall hazards, perceptions about the different methods of detecting fall hazards in their home; and intentions to remediate identified hazards.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Comparison of Home-based Video, Paper/Print Checklist and Professional Home Assessment in the Detection of Fall Hazards for Older Adults Living at Home: A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 5, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Home-Based Video

GoPro Camera

Behavioral: Video based/Therapists' rating of comprehensive-home-fall-hazard-checklist (vt-CHFHC)
The participant will use GoPro technology and follow standardized instructions to inspect each room of their house. They will navigate through their home wearing the GoPro camera, recording images about their home and their usual activities and use a talk-aloud approach to describe what they are doing and seeing. The evaluator will provide no feedback during the assessments.

Other: Paper Checklist

Homeowner Print Checklist

Behavioral: Paper based/Patient self-rating of comprehensive-home-fall-hazard-checklist (pp-CHFHC)
A paper version of CHFHC and other self-reported documents will be completed by the participants in their homes based on standardized verbal instruction provided by the research staff.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluation Agreement [Within 1 week of completion of assessment]

    Fall hazard scores will be calculated based on the number and severity of hazards identified from the paper checklist, the GoPro assessment, and the independent evaluation. The extent of agreement on fall-hazard score and time taken to complete the evaluations (home-based video, paper/print checklist; professional home assessment) will be assessed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Feasibility and Fidelity [Within 1 week of completion of assessment]

    Semi-structured phone interviews will be conducted to collect participant feedback on the feasibility, usability, usefulness, acceptance, barriers, facilitators, respondent burden and preference for using GoPro video-technology vs. pp-CHFHC vs. professional assessment. During the interview, participants will also be asked about their prior awareness of fall hazards and experiences about the different methods of detecting fall hazards in their home.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
50 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Healthy Group: community-dwelling adults

  • DRF Group: adults with 3-12 months post DRF

  • ability to read, understand and speak English

Exclusion Criteria:
  • identified cognitive disorder

  • major loss of vision or hearing

  • other concurrent upper extremity injuries or neurological impairments

  • any unhealed fractures

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada L8S 1C7

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • McMaster University
  • Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
McMaster University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02775604
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HIREB 1950
First Posted:
May 17, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Mar 1, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by McMaster University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 1, 2021