Identifying Circadian Rest-Activity Rhythm Disorders in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06023654
Collaborator
Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services (Other)
100
2
12.6
50
4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Circadian rest-Activity Rhythm disorders (CARDs) are common in patients with cancer, particularly in advanced disease. CARDs are associated with increased symptoms, poorer quality of life, poorer response to anticancer treatments and shorter survival.

The goal of this observational study is to see how common CARDs are in patients with advanced cancer and to characterise their rest and activity patterns in more detail.

A recent study has outlined a standard way to assess and diagnose a CARD.

This study aims to assess patients with advanced cancer for a CARD using a novel screening tool against this newly formed diagnostic criteria. Potentially modifiable risk factors will be considered along with associations between CARDs and symptoms, sleep preferences, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, quality of life measures and predictors of survival.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    100 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Preliminary Validation of a Novel Screening Tool and Diagnostic Criteria to Identify Circadian Rest-Activity Rhythm Disorders in Patients With Advanced Cancer
    Actual Study Start Date :
    May 15, 2023
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Jun 1, 2024
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Jun 1, 2024

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. To measure preliminary concurrent validity of a novel screening tool to identify Circadian rest-Activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer against diagnostic criteria [Time 1 (baseline), Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Assessing the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tool

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. To measure test-retest reliability of a novel screening tool to identify Circadian rest-Activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer [Time 1 (baseline), Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Assessing the correlation between scores from the screening tool at two time points

    2. To measure acceptability and ease of use of a novel screening tool to identify Circadian rest-Activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Patient ease of use, understandability, acceptability and time to complete.

    3. To measure acceptability and ease of use of a novel sleep and activity diary in patients with advanced cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Patient ease of use, understandability, and acceptability

    4. To identify the incidence of Circadian rest-activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Incidence of Circadian rest-Activity Rhythm Disorders as identified by diagnostic criteria

    5. To assess rest and physical activity patterns in patients with advanced cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Combined assessment using wrist and thigh accelerometry alongside a sleep and activity diary

    6. To assess the relationship between demographic details and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Baseline demographic details collected using a questionnaire

    7. To assess the relationship between past medical history and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Past medical history collected using a questionnaire

    8. To assess the relationship between current medication use and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Current medication use collected using a questionnaire

    9. To assess the relationship between chronotype and the risk of develop a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Chronotype assessed using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)

    10. To assess the relationship between occupation and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Occupation provided by participant using a questionnaire

    11. To assess the relationship between cigarette use and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [During 72 hours period of monitoring]

      Number and timing of last cigarette smoked each day assessed using a patient diary

    12. To assess the relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [During 72 hours period of monitoring]

      Number and timing of alcoholic beverages consumed each day assessed using a patient diary

    13. To assess the relationship between caffeine consumption and the risk of developing a Circadian rest-Activity Rhythms in patients with cancer [During 72 hours period of monitoring]

      Number and timing of last of caffeinated drink consumed each day assessed using a patient diary

    14. To assess associations between Circadian rest-activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer with symptoms [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Symptoms measured using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale - Short Form (MSAS-SF)

    15. To assess associations between Circadian rest-activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer and prognosis [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Prognosis measured using the Prognosis in Palliative Care tool (PiPS-B)

    16. To assess associations between Circadian rest-activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer with quality of life [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Quality of Life measured using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

    17. To assess associations between Circadian rest-activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer with sleep quality [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Sleep quality measured using the brief Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Instrument (bPSQI)

    18. To assess associations between Circadian rest-activity Rhythm Disorders in patients with advanced cancer with daytime sleepiness [Time 2 (after 72 consecutive hours of accelerometry monitoring)]

      Daytime sleepiness assess using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adult (18 years of age or older)

    • Locally advanced or metastatic cancer

    • Outpatient

    • Ambulatory

    • Prognosis of 3 months or more

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Inpatient

    • Shiftworker

    • Recent long-haul travel

    • Cognitive impairment impacting on ability to complete questionnaires

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Our Lady's Hospice & Care Services Dublin Ireland
    2 St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Dublin, Trinity College
    • Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Prof Andrew Davies, Professor of Palliative Medicine, University of Dublin, Trinity College
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT06023654
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1926A
    First Posted:
    Sep 5, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 5, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2023
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 5, 2023