BORG: Effect of Beta-blockers on Structural Remodeling and Gene Expression in the Failing Human Heart
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary goal of the study is to measure in the intact human heart, the alterations in gene expression over time that are associated with reverse remodeling in response to β-blockade. The second goal is to investigate the signaling mechanisms which in turn are responsible for these changes in gene expression, and the third goal is to determine the relationship between intrinsic systolic dysfunction and remodeling of the left ventricle. This will be accomplished by measuring ventricular size, function, and gene expression in myocardial tissue samples obtained by percutaneous biopsy prior to initiation of β-blockade and at 3 and 12 months after start of therapy. The specific Aims and Hypotheses to be tested are:
- Aim: Determine the changes in gene expression associated with changes in intrinsic systolic function and with functional decompensation in the intact, failing human heart.
- Hypothesis: Changes in the expression of select genes precede or accompany changes in left ventricular systolic function in humans with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC).
- Aim: Identify signaling mechanisms responsible for alterations in expression of key genes involved in mediation of ventricular hypertrophy or contractile dysfunction.
- Hypothesis: Myocardial-failure-associated regulation of select messenger ribonucleic acids and proteins are related to left ventricular wall stress and neurohormonal signaling.
- Aim: In the relationship between contractile dysfunction and dilatation/remodeling, determine the relationship between contractile dysfunction and structural remodeling.
- Hypothesis: the contractile dysfunction is primary and structural remodeling secondary.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Non-failing control Patients with normal ejection fraction who underwent a single myocardial biopsy and received no β-blocker therapy |
|
Active Comparator: Metoprolol succinate Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months |
Drug: Metoprolol succinate
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin titrated to a goal of 200 mg and 8 mg by mouth daily for 18 months |
Drug: Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Carvedilol Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months |
Drug: Carvedilol
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at 12 Months [12 months]
The primary clinical outcome will be LVEF response at 12 months defined as an improvement in LVEF of ≥ 8% at 12 months or if not available, ≥5% at 3 months in the absence of an adverse clinical outcome. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Improvement in LVEF at 3 Months [3 months]
A secondary outcome will be LVEF response at 3 months, defined as an improvement of ≥ 5% Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure.
- Composite of All-cause Mortality, Need for Heart Transplant or Need for Ventricular Assist Device. [18 months]
Clinical status at 18 months will be assessed at time of study completion, specifically for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, need for heart transplant, or need for ventricular assist device. Outcomes are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure.
Other Outcome Measures
- Change in Myocardial Gene Expression at 3 Months [3 months]
Changes in myocardial mRNA expression at 3 months compared to baseline using targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction and genome wide microarray assays. Due to the large number of results genes interrogated (~ 20,000 genes), these results will instead be uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus.
- Change in Myocardial Gene Expression at 12 Months [12 months]
Changes in myocardial mRNA expression at 12 months compared to baseline using targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Affymetrix genome-wide microarray assays. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure.
- Change in Myocardial microRNA Expression at 3 Months [3 months]
Changes in myocardial microRNA expression at 3 months compared to baseline using an Affymetrix microRNA microarray assay. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure.
- Change in Myocardial microRNA Expression at 12 Months [12 months]
Changes in myocardial microRNA expression at 12 months compared to baseline using an Affymetrix microRNA microarray assay. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with New York Heart Association Class II-IV symptoms
-
No evidence of coronary artery disease by angiography within 2 years of randomization
-
If female, patient is (a) surgically sterile or (b) practices an accepted method of birth control and has negative serum pregnancy test
-
Patient has been on other conventional cardiac heart failure(CHF) therapy at least 3 weeks prior to baseline assessments (includes angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin, diuretics, and/or vasodilators)
-
Patient has left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% by radionuclide ventriculography within 60 days of randomization
-
Patient must demonstrate mental and physical ability and willingness to follow all study-specific instructions
-
Patient must voluntarily sign Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form prior to any study-specific procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patient has heart failure due to or associated with uncorrected primary valvular disease, uncorrected thyroid disease, obstructive/hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis, active myocarditis, or malfunctioning artificial heart valve.
-
Patient is actively on heart transplant list or anticipated to be within 6 months of randomization
-
Patient is receiving any of the following medicines:
-
Calcium channel blockers
-
Theophylline
-
Tricyclic antidepressants
-
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors
-
β-agonists
-
β-adrenergic blocking agent (oral)
-
Any investigational cardiovascular medication or involvement in another investigational trial
-
Flecainide, encainide, propafenone, sotalol, disopyramide, or amiodarone
-
Patient has a contraindication to β-blockade (eg asthma)
-
Patient has another life-threatening disease with life expectancy < 2 years due to other illness
-
Patient has active hepatic, renal, hematologic, gastrointestinal, immunologic, endocrine, metabolic, or central nervous system disease which may adversely affect the safety and efficacy of the study drug or life span of the patient
-
Unstable decompensated heart failure (evidence of hypoperfusion, acute pulmonary edema, or hypotension with SBP < 80 mm Hg)
-
Patient is actively abusing ethanol or illicit drugs within 3 months of randomization
-
Patient has an automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator that has fired within 3 months of randomization
-
Patient has an asymptomatic waking, resting heart rate < 50 bpm or symptomatic bradycardia < 60 bpm.
-
Patient has uncontrolled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with a history of frequent hypoglycemia episodes
-
Patient has a high degree atrioventricular block (Mobitz Type II or complete heart block)
-
Patient is unable to tolerate magnetic resonance imaging procedures
-
Patient has demonstrated non-compliance with previous medical regimens
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Colorado Hospital | Denver | Colorado | United States | 80220 |
2 | University of Utah Medical Center | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84132 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- GlaxoSmithKline
- AstraZeneca
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael R Bristow, MD PhD, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 00-0242
- 2R01HL048013
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Patients were recruited between 9/1/2000 and 3/1/2008 from outpatient general cardiology and heart failure specialty clinics at the University of Colorado Hospital and University of Utah Health Sciences Center. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 65 patients met screening criteria and provided consent. Exclusions included personal preference (4), administrative reasons such as relocation (2), normalization of LVEF prior to assignment (2), and lack of central venous access (1). |
Arm/Group Title | Non-failing Control | Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with normal ejection fraction who underwent a single myocardial biopsy and received no β-blocker therapy | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin mesylate titrated to goals of 200 mg (metoprolol succinate) and 8 mg (doxazosin mesylate) by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months Carvedilol |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
STARTED | 4 | 19 | 16 | 17 |
COMPLETED | 4 | 17 | 14 | 16 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Non-failing Control | Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with normal ejection fraction who underwent a single myocardial biopsy and received no β-blocker therapy | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin mesylate titrated to goals of 200 mg (metoprolol succinate) and 8 mg (doxazosin mesylate) by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months Carvedilol | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 4 | 19 | 16 | 17 | 56 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
41.0
(17.1)
|
45.9
(13.6)
|
46.0
(7.5)
|
44.9
(15.1)
|
45.3
(12.8)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
1
25%
|
4
21.1%
|
6
37.5%
|
5
29.4%
|
16
28.6%
|
Male |
3
75%
|
15
78.9%
|
10
62.5%
|
12
70.6%
|
40
71.4%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||||
European Ancestry |
4
100%
|
15
78.9%
|
9
56.3%
|
13
76.5%
|
41
73.2%
|
African Ancestry |
0
0%
|
1
5.3%
|
4
25%
|
0
0%
|
5
8.9%
|
Hispanic |
0
0%
|
2
10.5%
|
1
6.3%
|
4
23.5%
|
7
12.5%
|
Other |
0
0%
|
1
5.3%
|
2
12.5%
|
0
0%
|
3
5.4%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||||
United States |
4
100%
|
19
100%
|
16
100%
|
17
100%
|
56
100%
|
LV ejection fraction (%) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [%] |
58.8
(7.4)
|
22.5
(7.1)
|
28.5
(8.7)
|
28.6
(8.7)
|
28.6
(11.9)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at 12 Months |
---|---|
Description | The primary clinical outcome will be LVEF response at 12 months defined as an improvement in LVEF of ≥ 8% at 12 months or if not available, ≥5% at 3 months in the absence of an adverse clinical outcome. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients naive to beta-blocker therapy |
Arm/Group Title | Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin titrated to a goal of 200 mg and 8 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months Carvedilol |
Measure Participants | 17 | 14 | 16 |
Number [LVEF responders] |
12
|
10
|
9
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Metoprolol Succinate, Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin, Carvedilol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in rate of LVEF improvement according to treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.685 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Improvement in LVEF at 3 Months |
---|---|
Description | A secondary outcome will be LVEF response at 3 months, defined as an improvement of ≥ 5% Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin titrated to a goal of 200 mg and 8 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months Carvedilol |
Measure Participants | 17 | 14 | 16 |
Number [LVEF responders] |
16
|
10
|
10
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Metoprolol Succinate, Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin, Carvedilol |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in rate of LVEF improvement according to treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.071 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Composite of All-cause Mortality, Need for Heart Transplant or Need for Ventricular Assist Device. |
---|---|
Description | Clinical status at 18 months will be assessed at time of study completion, specifically for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, need for heart transplant, or need for ventricular assist device. Outcomes are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Time Frame | 18 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to different beta-blocker strategies. Data does not include non-failing controls, as these patients only underwent baseline evaluation with no treatment or follow-up, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Arm/Group Title | Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin mesylate titrated to goals of 200 mg (metoprolol succinate) and 8 mg (doxazosin mesylate) by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months Carvedilol |
Measure Participants | 17 | 14 | 16 |
Number [participants] |
1
25%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Title | Change in Myocardial Gene Expression at 3 Months |
---|---|
Description | Changes in myocardial mRNA expression at 3 months compared to baseline using targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction and genome wide microarray assays. Due to the large number of results genes interrogated (~ 20,000 genes), these results will instead be uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Change in Myocardial Gene Expression at 12 Months |
---|---|
Description | Changes in myocardial mRNA expression at 12 months compared to baseline using targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Affymetrix genome-wide microarray assays. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Change in Myocardial microRNA Expression at 3 Months |
---|---|
Description | Changes in myocardial microRNA expression at 3 months compared to baseline using an Affymetrix microRNA microarray assay. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Time Frame | 3 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Change in Myocardial microRNA Expression at 12 Months |
---|---|
Description | Changes in myocardial microRNA expression at 12 months compared to baseline using an Affymetrix microRNA microarray assay. Data are not presented for non-failing controls, who only went baseline evaluation and did not undergo treatment, given that they did not have heart failure. |
Time Frame | 12 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 18 months | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol | |||
Arm/Group Description | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients randomized to metoprolol succinate titrated to a goal of 200 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive metoprolol succinate and doxazosin titrated to a goal of 200 mg and 8 mg by mouth daily for 18 months Metoprolol succinate + doxazosin | Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients who were randomized to receive carvedilol titrated to a goal of 25 mg by mouth twice daily for 18 months Carvedilol | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Metoprolol Succinate | Metoprolol Succinate + Doxazosin | Carvedilol | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/14 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Michael Bristow, MD PhD |
---|---|
Organization | University of Colorado, Denver |
Phone | 303-724-5453 |
Michael.Bristow@ucdenver.edu |
- 00-0242
- 2R01HL048013