Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach or Filling the Buccal Gap Versus Connective Tissue Graft

Sponsor
Cairo University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05776498
Collaborator
(none)
36
1
3
26
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Tooth extraction is followed by ridge alteration and soft tissue collapse and recession. Different strategies were proposed to limit this collapse however, the ability of these techniques to mimic the original soft tissue level and to maintain long term stability is unclear (Slagter et al., 2014). Using customized contoured healing abutments at the time of immediate implant placement is a treatment modality to improve esthetics by maintaining the soft tissue level and contour (Ruales-Carrera et al, 2019, Perez et al, 2020). Using connective tissue grafts has been suggested to enhance and maintain soft tissue stability, however, the effect of the combined procedures for maintenance of the soft tissue morphology compared to customized healing abutments alone remains unclear (Atieh et al, 2019). In patients with non-restorable teeth in the esthetic zone, will the use of bone grafts to the dual zone or filling the buccal gap with customized healing abutment vs the use of connective tissue graft with customized healing abutment in immediately placed implants shows better buccal contour avoiding horizontal collapse?

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique.
  • Procedure: immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting
  • Procedure: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft till the bone crest
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
36 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach or Filling the Buccal Gap Versus Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique.

immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique.

Procedure: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique.
Tooth extraction and immediate implant placement as mentioned, then particulate bone graft will be packed in the gap between the implant and the buccal plate of bone and the tissue (dual zone), then will be covered by a customized healing abutment.

Experimental: immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting

immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting

Procedure: immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting
Tooth extraction and immediate implant placement as mentioned. Connective tissue grafts will be harvested from the hard palate and placed at the implant sites in a supraperiosteal partial dissection pouch prepared at the buccal aspect without using vertical incisions and without flap elevation. Sutures will be used to stabilize the graft in its desired place. Followed by customized healing abutment.

Active Comparator: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft till the bone crest

immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft till the bone crest

Procedure: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft till the bone crest
After atraumatic extraction, immediate implant of suitable size will be placed using standard implant system protocol Placement of the implant without any raising of the flap will be performed in the correct implant position. Primary stability of the implant will be measured by rotational insertion torque value, to be ≥30Ncm. After then, the temporary cylindrical abutment will be screwed to the implant and then flowable composite will be injected to adapt to the abutment that will be sand-blasted previously for mechanical retention of the composite, taking the shape of the socket at the marginal gingiva. Particulate bone grafts will be packed in the gap between the implant and the buccal plate of bone till the crest level, then will be covered by a customized healing abutment that will be done as mentioned before but will only seal the socket without extending deeper apically in the soft tissue. The custom healing screw will then be screwed to the implant with the correct torque.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. pink esthetic score (PES) [3 months after crown placement]

    To evaluate the pink esthetic score 1-14 score

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Volumetric analysis of buccal contour [6 months]

    3D viewer soft tissue; mm changes in the buccal soft tissue contour in comparison to the original ones, at 2,4 and 6 mm from the pre-operative gingival margin

  2. Mid-facial recession [1 year]

    3D viewer soft tissue

  3. Interdental papilla [1 year]

    3D viewer soft tissue

  4. Horizontal labio-palatal bone width [1 year]

    CBCT cone beam CT

  5. Bone formed labial to the implant [1 year]

    CBCT cone beam CT

  6. gingival biotype [1 year]

    thickness in millimeters mm

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion criteria:
Patient-related criteria:
  • Adults at or above the age of 18.

  • Non-restorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth requiring extraction and needed an implant placing therapy.

  • The failing tooth will have adjacent and opposing natural teeth.

  • Sufficient mesial-distal and interocclusal space for placement of the implant and definitive restoration.

  • Able to tolerate surgical periodontal procedures.

  • Full mouth plaque and bleeding scores less than 20%.

  • Compliance with the maintenance program.

  • Provide informed consent.

  • Accepts the one-year follow-up period.

Teeth related criteria:
  • Intact thick biotype gingival tissue with at least 2mm band of keratinized tissue.

  • Intact socket wall before the extraction, buccal bone thickness ≤1mm assessed by CBCT.

  • Sufficient apical bone to place an immediate implant with minimum primary stability of 30Ncm.

Exclusion criteria:
  • Patients diagnosed with periodontal diseases.

  • Current or previous smokers.

  • Pregnant and lactating females.

  • Patients with medical conditions that would compromise the surgical procedures; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, taking IV Bis-phosphonates for treatment of osteoporosis.

  • Patients with active infection related at the site of implant/bone graft placement.

  • Patients with parafunctional habits

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 International Dental Continuing Education Cairo Egypt 00000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Cairo University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Noha A Ghallab, PhD, Professor of Oral Medicine & Periodontology

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nesma Mohamed Fouad Shemais, Lecturer in the department of Oral Medicine & Periodontology, Cairo University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05776498
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IDCE.N3
First Posted:
Mar 20, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Mar 20, 2023
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Nesma Mohamed Fouad Shemais, Lecturer in the department of Oral Medicine & Periodontology, Cairo University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 20, 2023