Immediate Implant With Different Filling Materials

Sponsor
Mansoura University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05878392
Collaborator
(none)
36
1
3
12
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

36 patients, were included in this study. They were chosen from the Outpatient Clinic in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: bone filling materials
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
36 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison Between Different Filling Materials in Immediate Implant
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: group 1

immediate implant placement and the buccal jumping gap was packed using PRF

Other: bone filling materials
the buccal jumping gap was packed using PRF in group 1 the buccal jumping gap was packed using xenograft in group 2 the buccal jumping gap was packed using Alloplastic β-tricalcium phosphate in group 3

Experimental: group 2

immediate implant placement and the buccal jumping gap was packed using xenograft

Other: bone filling materials
the buccal jumping gap was packed using PRF in group 1 the buccal jumping gap was packed using xenograft in group 2 the buccal jumping gap was packed using Alloplastic β-tricalcium phosphate in group 3

Experimental: group 3

immediate implant placement and the buccal jumping gap was packed using alloplast

Other: bone filling materials
the buccal jumping gap was packed using PRF in group 1 the buccal jumping gap was packed using xenograft in group 2 the buccal jumping gap was packed using Alloplastic β-tricalcium phosphate in group 3

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. marginal bone loss [1 year]

    Cone Beam CT (CBCT) was used measure marginal bone loss

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Implant Stability: [1 year]

    Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to measure implant stability with an Osstell Mentor device.

  2. Peri-implant Pocket depth [1 year]

    A graduated probe was used to measure the distance between the base of the pocket and the gingival margin

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient medically free from systemic diseases.

  • Age above 18 years.

  • A single maxillary anterior or premolar tooth that cannot be restored.

  • No acute infection is present.

  • Patients with sufficient quality and quantity of bone.

  • Free from history of bruxism.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • A medical condition that would prevent implant surgery.

  • Existence of non-treated generalized progressive periodontitis.

  • Patients who are smokers.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Heba Elsheikh Mansoura, Egypt Egypt 002

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mansoura University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05878392
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A0103023OS
First Posted:
May 26, 2023
Last Update Posted:
May 26, 2023
Last Verified:
May 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 26, 2023