Immune Thrombocytopenia Management in Adults

Sponsor
Nahda University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05861297
Collaborator
(none)
467
1
5
46.9
10

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Immune thrombocytopenia treatment has evolved recently. However, none of treatments have only benefits without drawbacks. This study compares the clinical outcomes and adverse drug patterns of different treatment options. Medications which will be assessed during the current study are High Dose-dexamethasone (HD-DXM) (control group), Prednisolone + Azathioprine, Rituximab, Eltrombopag, and Romiplostim.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

A prospective controlled randomized study was conducted on primary Immune thrombocytopenia patients. The study's main objective is to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events profile of the different therapeutic approaches during Immune thrombocytopenia. Upon the confirmation of the Immune thrombocytopenia diagnosis, all patients immediately initiated the High Dose-dexamethasone as a frontline therapy for Immune thrombocytopenia with a dose of 40 mg/m2 daily for 4 days/week in the first month for one cycle. Then, the recruited patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria are randomly assigned into one of five groups. Among these patients, the control group received IV pulse (HD-DXM) therapy with 40 mg/m2 daily for 4 successive days in a 28-day cycle to complete the six cycles. The Prednisolone + Azathioprine group received 20 mg of Prednisolone three times daily and 1 mg/kg of oral Azathioprine once daily for two weeks, then tapering the Prednisolone dose through the subsequent weeks (6 weeks). While continuing treatment with Azathioprine for a total of six months. The Rituximab group received 500 mg/m2 intravenously of Rituximab once weekly for one month. The Eltrombopag group received 50 mg of Eltrombopag four hours before or after meals as oral daily doses for 6 months. The Romiplostim group received 3μg/kg sub-cutaneous injection of Romiplostim once a week for 6 months. The first evaluation date of confirmed ITP diagnosis was well-defined as the first index date (baseline). After that, every patient visited the investigational site as the protocol prescribes once weekly to assess and adjust the doses of study medications. The outcome measures were judged at baseline, at the end of treatment (6 months), and after an additional 6-month free treatment period.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
467 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Factorial Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
comparsion between five groupscomparsion between five groups
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Outcomes and Safety of Immunomodulators and Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Egyptian Patients With Hemorrhage Comorbidity
Actual Study Start Date :
May 5, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 18, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 2, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group

The first (control )group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received IV pulse (High Dose-Dexamethasone) therapy

Drug: Dexamethasone
Patients were initiated with High Dose-Dexamethasone with a dose of 40 mg/m2 daily for four days per week immediately after the diagnosis of ITP for 6 months

Experimental: PSL - AZA group

The second group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received Prednisolone -Azathioprine therapy

Drug: Prednisolone and Azathioprine
the second group received 20 mg of Prednisolone three times daily and 1 mg/kg of oral Azathioprine once daily for two weeks, then tapering the Prednisolone dose through the subsequent weeks (6 weeks). While continuing treatment with Azathioprine for a total of six months.

Experimental: The RTX group

The third group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received Prednisolone -Azathioprine therapy

Drug: Rituximab
The third group received 500 mg/m2 intravenously of Rituximab once weekly for one month

Experimental: The ELTRO group

The fourth group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received E therapy

Drug: Eltrombopag
The fourth group received 50 mg of Eltrombopag four hours before or after meals as oral daily doses for 6 months

Experimental: The ROMP group

The fifth group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received Romiplostim therapy

Drug: Romiplostim
The fifth group received 3μg/kg subcutaneous injection of Romiplostim once a week for 6 months

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. total patients who achieved sustained and overall response [18 months]

    The primary outcomes were the total percentage of patients achieving a sustained response (SR) till the end of the study, complete response (CR), and partial response (PR). CR was characterized by the absence of bleeding and an increase in the platelet count to above 100×109/L after one month of the treatment. SR was defined as achieving CR or partial response (PR) until the end of the study with a 2-fold upsurge from starting point [20, 21]. PR was represented as PLTs count ≥ 30×109/L after one month following therapy, and no response (NR) was defined as platelets < 30×109/L or bleeding

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. number of patients relapsed and adverse events [18 months]

    The secondary outcome measures were a number of patients relapsed and adverse events (AEs). Relapse was pointed out as PLTs count below 30×109/L or bleeding episodes owing to thrombocytopenia afterward achieving the CR

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Inclusion criteria were adult patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with primary ITP after excluding secondary causes and with an initial PLTs count of less than 30 ×109/L or with hemorrhage manifestations.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with a confirmed secondary ITP diagnoses such as (chemicals induced, systemic lupus erythematosus, immune thyroid diseases, a lymphoproliferative disease, or chronic infection, such as Helicobacter pylori, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV); with cardiac, renal, or liver disease; who had received NSAIDs or anti-platelets within one month before the initiation of the enrollment were excluded from the study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 EL-Kasr elineiy Cairo Egypt 52611

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nahda University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohamed Hussein Meabed, professor, faculty of medicine beni-suef university

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Eman Mostafa Hamed, Teaching Assistant clinical pharmacy department, faculty of pharmacy, Nahda University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05861297
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NahdaV
First Posted:
May 16, 2023
Last Update Posted:
May 16, 2023
Last Verified:
May 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Eman Mostafa Hamed, Teaching Assistant clinical pharmacy department, faculty of pharmacy, Nahda University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 16, 2023