MCSkipp: School Influenza Vaccine vs Standard of Care With Nested Trial of 2 Parent Notification Intensities

Sponsor
Monroe County Department of Public Health (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01224301
Collaborator
University of Rochester (Other)
25,366
1
3
16
1585.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Purpose of the study. The purpose of the project is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and cost effectiveness of providing influenza vaccine in schools to children in grades Kindergarten through 6th grade.

Hypothesis 1: School based influenza vaccination (SIV) will increase the overall rate of influenza vaccination in school children.

Hypothesis 2: Higher intensity parent notification about school based influenza vaccination does not increase immunization rates compared to low intensity.

Hypothesis 3: School based vaccination from the perspective of mass vaccinators is cost neutral.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: School based flu vaccine: Low intensity
  • Behavioral: School based flu vaccine: High intensity
N/A

Detailed Description

Background. The ACIP (American Committee on Immunization Practices) has now recommended influenza vaccination for all children 6 months to 18 years of age. While many school-aged children will be vaccinated in the medical home, the large number of children for whom the vaccine is now recommended exceeds the capacity of many primary care settings. Schools have been recommended as potential sites for influenza vaccination, yet little is known about the feasibility, implementation requirements, costs, or effectiveness of school-based influenza vaccination (SIV) programs. This project will implement and rigorously evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, billing and reimbursement components, costs, cost-effectiveness, and overall effectiveness of an SIV program that targets diverse populations and different intensity of interventions.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
25366 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Factorial Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Monroe COunty School Kids Influenza Prevention Project
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: School based flu vaccine: High intensity

Interventions: Parents in high intensity schools have access to school-based flu vaccine clinics and 3 or more communications from schools about influenza illness, influenza vaccine, and school based clinics.

Behavioral: School based flu vaccine: High intensity
Interventions: Parents in high intensity schools have 3 or more communications from schools about influenza illness, influenza vaccine, and school based clinics.
Other Names:
  • Trivalent injectable influenza vaccine
  • Live Attenuated Influenza vaccine
  • School based vaccines
  • Experimental: School based flu vaccine: Low intensity

    Interventions: Parents in low intensity schools have access to school-based flu vaccine clinics and less than 3 communications from schools about influenza illness, influenza vaccine, and school based clinics.

    Behavioral: School based flu vaccine: Low intensity
    Interventions: Parents of children in Low Intensity Notification schools got less than 3 communications from schools describing influenza vaccine and the clinics, and consent forms sent home one.
    Other Names:
  • Trivalent injectable influenza vaccine
  • Live Attenuated Influenza vaccine
  • School based vaccines
  • No Intervention: Standard of Care

    Control Schools did not have any in school seasonal influenza vaccine clinics. Parents of children in control schools got no notification from the schools and sought seasonal influenza vaccines for their children as they normally would.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Seasonal influenza vaccine rates for children attending schools with and without school-based influenza vaccine delivery as reported in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS). [Year 1 Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 15 2009 to January 15, 2010]

      Number of children with at least one seasonal influenza vaccine given in school compared to number of children with influenza vaccine given elsewhere and number of children with no record of influenza vaccine.

    2. Seasonal influenza vaccine rates for children attending schools with and without school-based influenza vaccine delivery as reported in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS). [Year 2: Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 1, 2010 to January 15, 2011]

      Number of children with at least one seasonal influenza vaccine given in school compared to number of children with influenza vaccine given elsewhere and number of children with no record of influenza vaccine.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of seasonal influenza vaccines received by children enrolled in schools with high vs. low vs. no parental notification. [Year 1 Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 15, 2009 to January 15, 2010]

      Vaccine rates among children offered seasonal influenza vaccine in school whose parents got high intensity notification of the program vs those who got low intensity notification. Notification included educational materials, program description, consent forms, phone messages, and varied by type and frequency for schools with High and Low levels of parental notification.

    2. Number of seasonal influenza vaccines received by children enrolled in schools with high vs low vs no parental notification. [Year 2: Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 1, 2010 to January 15, 2011]

      Vaccine rates among children offered seasonal influenza vaccine in school whose parents got high intensity notification of the program vs those who got low intensity notification. Notification included educational materials, program description, consent forms, phone messages, and varied by type and frequency for schools with High and Low levels of parental notification.

    3. Costs and incremental cost effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines delivered in schools compared to cost of influenza vaccines delivered in private practice. [Time Frame: (FDAAA) Year 1 Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 15 2009 to January 15, 2010]

      Economic analysis of costs and revenues associated with school-based seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by a mass vaccinator. The project is based on a business model for purchasing/acquiring vaccine from vendors and vaccines for children, and recovering payment from insurance. Costs associated with vaccines administered in school are derived from this clinical trial, School Influenza Vaccine vs Standard of Care, and private practice data are from the literature.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    4 Years to 13 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Children in grades K through 5 enrolled in schools that agreed to participate in the randomized trial of school based influenza vaccine

    Exclusion Criteria:

    Children and schools not enrolled in school based influenza vaccine program Children in participating schools in grades other than Kindergarten through 5th grade.

    -

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Monroe County Department of Public Health Rochester New York United States 14692

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Monroe County Department of Public Health
    • University of Rochester

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Sharon G. Humiston, M.D., M.P.H., University of Rochester

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Sharon G. Humiston, M.D., M.P.H., Principal Investigator, University of Rochester
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01224301
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 00439262
    First Posted:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Keywords provided by Sharon G. Humiston, M.D., M.P.H., Principal Investigator, University of Rochester
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 4, 2012