The Impact of Chloroprocaine 3% for Ambulatory Foot Surgery on Perioperative Process Costs

Sponsor
Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02406703
Collaborator
(none)
100
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Background and Objectives Short acting regional anesthetics have already been successfully employed for peripheral nerve blocks in an ambulatory surgery setting. However, the impact on direct and indirect perioperative costs comparing two different short-acting local anesthetics has not been performed, yet.

Methods In an observational study including 50 patients per group, patient undergoing popliteal block with chloroprocaine 3% or mepivacaine 1.5% for ambulatory minor foot surgery were compared. The primary outcome was the saving of both direct and indirect perioperative costs. Secondary outcomes were block success, onset time and block duration, patient satisfaction and unplanned outpatient visits or readmissions after discharge.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
100 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Can the Choice of the Local Anesthetic Have an Impact on Ambulatory Surgery Perioperative Costs? Chloroprocaine for Popliteal Block in Outpatient Foot Surgery
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Chloroprocaine

Patient undergoing popliteal block with chloroprocaine

Drug: Chloroprocaine

Mepivacaine

Patient undergoing popliteal block with mepivacaine

Drug: Mepivacaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Cost minimization analysis [6 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • ASA I-III scheduled for elective, unilateral, ambulant minor foot surgery (percutaneous hallux valgus correction, osteotomies, tenotomies, mallet and hammer toes correction, screws and/or plaques removal)
Exclusion Criteria:
  • known allergy to drugs used in the study;

  • coagulopathies, known neuropathy;

  • pregnancy;

  • chronic pain;

  • drug or alcohol abuse;

  • psychiatric disease or lack of competence affecting compliance and evidence of ongoing sepsis or local skin / subcutaneous tissues infections in the popliteal fossa.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Andrea Saporito, MD, Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02406703
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BLV07
First Posted:
Apr 2, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Mar 11, 2020
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2020
Keywords provided by Andrea Saporito, MD, Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 11, 2020