QdV-ONCOREA: Impact of ICU on the Quality of Life in Cancer Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is an observational, prospective, monocentric, case-control study. Investigators aim to compare the quality of life and oncological treatment strategy in cancer patients admitted or not in ICU.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Inclusion of cancer patients (cases) at discharge of surgical, cardiovascular and thoracic and medical ICU of the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital.
Cases will be matched with cancer patients identified in oncologist's consultation.
Inclusion of controls from oncologist consultations (2 controls for 1 case) For cases and controls, medical data will be collected at inclusion, 3 and 6 months.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Cases > 18 years old Non-opposition of the patient or relatives Lung, head and neck or colorectal cancer Non scheduled ICU admission At least 24 hours of ICU stay Alive at ICU discharge Able to answer by phone to quality of life questionary |
Other: Questionnaires
Quality of life questionary: 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (36-SF) at 3 and 6 months from inclusion By phone
|
Controls Cancer patients not admitted in ICU, matched with the cases according to the type of primary cancer the presence or absence of oncogenic addiction the setting of anticancer treatment (curative/palliative) the line of anticancer treatment (none/L1/L2-L3/>L3). |
Other: Questionnaires
Quality of life questionary: 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (36-SF) at 3 and 6 months from inclusion By phone
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- quality of life questionary 36-item short form survey instrument (36-SF) [3 months]
score of 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (very good quality of life)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- intensity of antitumoral treatment compared to standard treatment [3 months]
standard treatment vs adaptated treatment vs palliative care standard treatment was defined by the treatment recommended in the ESMO guidelines for each cancer (lung, colorectal, and head and neck cancer)
- quality of life questionary 36-item short form survey instrument (36-SF) [6 months]
score of 0 (poor quality of life) to 100 (very good quality of life)
- intensity of antitumoral treatment compared to standard treatment [6 months]
standard treatment vs adaptated treatment vs palliative care standard treatment was defined by the treatment recommended in the ESMO guidelines for each cancer (lung, colorectal, and head and neck cancer)
- ECOG - Performance status [3 months and 6 months]
From 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead)
- Activities of Daily Living [6 months]
From 0 (dependent ) to 6 (autonomous)
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [3 months and 6 months]
Anxiety scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 21 (anxiety) Depression Scale from 0 (no depression) to 21 (depression)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18 ans
-
Non-opposition of the patient or relatives
-
Lung, head and neck or colorectal cancer
-
Non scheduled ICU admission
-
At least 24 hours of ICU stay
-
Alive at ICU discharge
-
Able to answer by phone to quality of life questionary
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Unable to answer by phone to quality of life questionary
-
Patient participating in another clinical study that could interfere with the results of the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chu Grenoble Alpes | Grenoble Cedex 9 | France | 38043 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University Hospital, Grenoble
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 38RC19.420
- 2019-A03307-40