Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With CTG vs ADM
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study aims at comparing two different approaches for vertical soft tissue augmentation at implant sites exhibiting soft tissue dehiscences: autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The present randomized clinical trial aims at investigating two approaches (autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative) when performed for vertical soft tissue augmentation at sites with peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences. Clinical, volumetric, ultrasonographic, and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at different time points up to 1 year.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Connective tissue graft Autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft and then de-epithelialized |
Procedure: Vertical soft tissue augmentation
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG)
|
Experimental: Dermal matrix + EMD Acellular dermal matrix and enamel matrix derivative |
Procedure: Vertical soft tissue augmentation
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Soft tissue dehiscence depth [12 months]
Change of the depth of the Soft tissue dehiscence (vertical measurement of the complication, in relation to the level of the cemento-enamel junction of the contralateral homologous tooth) at 12 months compared to baseline (expressed in millimeters)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Complete peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage [12 months]
Percentage of cases with complete resolution of the implant esthetic complication (expressed as a percentage)
- mean peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage [12 months]
Percentage of coverage of the soft tissue dehiscence compared to baseline, measured with a formula considering final PSTD depth and initial PSTD depth (expressed as a percentage)
- Mucosal thickness changes [3, 6, and 12 months]
Changes within the mucosal thickness measured with ultrasonography (expressed in mm)
- 3D Volumetric changes [3, 6, and 12 months]
Changes within the buccal contour measured by superimposing digital impressions obtained with optical scanning (expressed in mm^3)
- Post-operative pain [14 days after the surgery]
Patient-reported pain after the surgical procedure (expressed with a 0-10 visual analogue scale [VAS])
- Professional esthetic assessment (IDES) [12 months]
Esthetic outcomes of the treatment assessed by a calibrated operator using the Implant soft tissue Dehiscence coverage Esthetic Score (IDES) (expressed using points, based on the IDES classification system from Zucchelli et al. 2021) The range is from 0 (worst outcome) to 10 (best outcome)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
-
Age ≥ 18 years
-
Periodontally and systemically healthy
-
Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20% (measured at four sites per tooth)
-
Presence of single functional dental implant in the anterior with a PSTD
-
Implants diagnosed as healthy (Berglundh et al., 2018)
Exclusion criteria are:
-
Contraindications for surgery
-
Systemic condition (e.g. diabetes mellitus, HIV, cancer, etc) that could compromise wound healing
-
Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported)
-
Untreated periodontitis
-
Untreated peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al., 2018)
-
Smoking, defined as self-reported daily habit. Occasional smokers won't be excluded
-
History of soft tissue grafting at the implant site within the last 6 months
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Harvard School of Dental Medicine | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Tavelli, DDS, MS, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, USA
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ITI IMP (22-0600)