Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With CTG vs ADM

Sponsor
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM) (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05729607
Collaborator
(none)
28
1
2
32.9
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study aims at comparing two different approaches for vertical soft tissue augmentation at implant sites exhibiting soft tissue dehiscences: autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Vertical soft tissue augmentation
  • Procedure: Vertical soft tissue augmentation
N/A

Detailed Description

The present randomized clinical trial aims at investigating two approaches (autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative) when performed for vertical soft tissue augmentation at sites with peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences. Clinical, volumetric, ultrasonographic, and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at different time points up to 1 year.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
28 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Parallel-armParallel-arm
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With Dermal Matrix and Enamel Matrix Derivative vs Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized, Controlled, Clinical, Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 27, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 27, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Connective tissue graft

Autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft and then de-epithelialized

Procedure: Vertical soft tissue augmentation
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG)

Experimental: Dermal matrix + EMD

Acellular dermal matrix and enamel matrix derivative

Procedure: Vertical soft tissue augmentation
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Soft tissue dehiscence depth [12 months]

    Change of the depth of the Soft tissue dehiscence (vertical measurement of the complication, in relation to the level of the cemento-enamel junction of the contralateral homologous tooth) at 12 months compared to baseline (expressed in millimeters)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Complete peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage [12 months]

    Percentage of cases with complete resolution of the implant esthetic complication (expressed as a percentage)

  2. mean peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage [12 months]

    Percentage of coverage of the soft tissue dehiscence compared to baseline, measured with a formula considering final PSTD depth and initial PSTD depth (expressed as a percentage)

  3. Mucosal thickness changes [3, 6, and 12 months]

    Changes within the mucosal thickness measured with ultrasonography (expressed in mm)

  4. 3D Volumetric changes [3, 6, and 12 months]

    Changes within the buccal contour measured by superimposing digital impressions obtained with optical scanning (expressed in mm^3)

  5. Post-operative pain [14 days after the surgery]

    Patient-reported pain after the surgical procedure (expressed with a 0-10 visual analogue scale [VAS])

  6. Professional esthetic assessment (IDES) [12 months]

    Esthetic outcomes of the treatment assessed by a calibrated operator using the Implant soft tissue Dehiscence coverage Esthetic Score (IDES) (expressed using points, based on the IDES classification system from Zucchelli et al. 2021) The range is from 0 (worst outcome) to 10 (best outcome)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion criteria:
  • Age ≥ 18 years

  • Periodontally and systemically healthy

  • Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20% (measured at four sites per tooth)

  • Presence of single functional dental implant in the anterior with a PSTD

  • Implants diagnosed as healthy (Berglundh et al., 2018)

Exclusion criteria are:
  • Contraindications for surgery

  • Systemic condition (e.g. diabetes mellitus, HIV, cancer, etc) that could compromise wound healing

  • Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported)

  • Untreated periodontitis

  • Untreated peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al., 2018)

  • Smoking, defined as self-reported daily habit. Occasional smokers won't be excluded

  • History of soft tissue grafting at the implant site within the last 6 months

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts United States 02115

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Tavelli, DDS, MS, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, USA

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Lorenzo Tavelli, Assistant Professor, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05729607
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ITI IMP (22-0600)
First Posted:
Feb 15, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Feb 16, 2023
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 16, 2023