Safety and Efficacy of Sonohysterosalpingography for the Evaluation of Infertility
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This pilot study is a collaborative effort between Northwell Health's Departments of Fertility and Radiology.The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the Sonohysterosalpingography (sonoHSG) for it to be determined as the standard of care. Additionally, it aims to improve the work up of infertility by integrating the examination of structural abnormalities of the Fallopian tubes and uterus into a single radiation free ultrasound guided procedure, the sonoHSG.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This pilot study is a collaborative effort between Northwell Health Fertility and the Radiology Department to streamline the fertility evaluation process and reduce the burden of stress many fertility patients experience by eliminating an imaging examination which is painful and exposes the patient to potentially harmful radiation.
The aim of this study is to improve the workup of infertility by integrating the examination of structural abnormalities of the fallopian tubes and uterus into a single radiation-free ultrasound guided procedure, the sonohysterosalpingogram (sonoHSG). Confirmation of tubal patency is extremely important as approximately 25-35% of female infertility can be attributed to fallopian tube pathology. The current paradigm is to use two separate imaging exams; the hysterosalpingogram (HSG), a transvaginal procedure that uses radiation and iodinated contrast to visualize the fallopian tubes, and the sonohysterogram, a transvaginal procedure that uses ultrasound and saline to visualize the uterus. By using agitated saline, to produce air bubbles, fallopian tube visualization is optimized during the time of sonohysterogram (sonoHSG). The investigators plan to also utilize a continuous saline-air device that may produce a technically superior sonoHSG.
As a result of this study, the Radiology Department and Northwell Health Fertility will work together to encourage, educate, and support physicians to promote the utility of sonoHSG as the first imaging examination for the infertility workup. Currently, this institution is not routinely utilizing the sonoHSG despite the advantages in safety, comfort, and convenience to the patient. The investigators aim to effect a change in the current practice at this institution by increasing the knowledge and visibility of the sonoHSG by creating educational materials for referring physicians, and creating a pilot program that demonstrates the value and efficacy of the exam. SonoHSG can be performed concurrently at the time of the sonohysterogram at no additional cost to the patient.
The investigators will enroll 30 patients from Northwell Health Fertility over the course of one year. Measures of success will include concordance between sonoHSG and HSG in patients who receive both procedures, and patient surveys evaluating pain utilizing the pain scale. If sonoHSG proves to be efficacious, future steps will be to educate referring physicians and patients about the utility of the examination using print materials and a grand rounds lecture. The investigators will also measure the number of sonoHSGs ordered compared to HSGs for the evaluation of fallopian tube patency in order to evaluate if there has been a shift in the standard of care.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: sonoHSG This is the research procedure and it will be added onto the standard of care procedure for all subjects. |
Procedure: sonoHSG
This procedure uses agitated saline to produce air bubbles at the time of the Sonohysterogram which optimizes fallopian tube visualization. The sonoHSG is free of radiation and use of contrast. In this study, in order to produce the air bubbles at the time of the sonohysterogram, the investigators will be using a continuous saline-air device that may produce a technically superior image. For the ultrasound images, General Electric will be supporting us by providing us the Voluson E10 and RIC5-9-D.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Concordance between sonoHSG and HSG results. The sonoHSG and HSG will be considered interchangeable if the level of agreement between them is >= 80%. [1 year]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Quantification of level of patient pain in regard to sonoHSG versus HSG [1 year]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Undergoing evaluation for infertility in the Northwell Health System
-
Non-pregnant women age 18-50 years old
-
Subject is not menstruating at the time of study
-
Provide written informed consent and written HIPAA authorization prior to study initiation
-
Willing to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation schedule
Exclusion Criteria:
-
History of active pelvic infection
-
History of tubal ligation or salpingectomy
-
History of adverse reaction to iodinated contrast
-
Subject is pregnant
-
Subject is menstruating at time of study
-
Subject is unable to participate in study evaluations pre- and post-treatment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Northwell Health- North Shore University Hospital | Manhasset | New York | United States | 11030 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Northwell Health
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Pellerito, MD, Northwell Health
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Carusotti C, Lanzi G, Marconi D, Arduini D. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Aug;10(3):367-72.
- Handelzalts JE, Levy S, Peled Y, Binyamin L, Wiznitzer A, Goldzweig G, Krissi H. Information seeking and perceptions of anxiety and pain among women undergoing hysterosalpingography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
- Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Luciano AA. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):994-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Review.
- Maheux-Lacroix S, Boutin A, Moore L, Bergeron MÈ, Bujold E, Laberge PY, Lemyre M, Dodin S. Hysterosalpingosonography for diagnosing tubal occlusion in subfertile women: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 4;2:50. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-50.
- Marci R, Marcucci I, Marcucci AA, Pacini N, Salacone P, Sebastianelli A, Caponecchia L, Lo Monte G, Rago R. Hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy): evaluation of the pain perception, side effects and complications. BMC Med Imaging. 2013 Aug 23;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-28.
- Schankath AC, Fasching N, Urech-Ruh C, Hohl MK, Kubik-Huch RA. Hysterosalpingography in the workup of female infertility: indications, technique and diagnostic findings. Insights Imaging. 2012 Oct;3(5):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s13244-012-0183-y. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
- Szymusik I, Grzechocińska B, Marianowski P, Kaczyński B, Wielgoś M. Factors influencing the severity of pain during hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 May;129(2):118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
- 16-0967