Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Versus Platelet Rich Plasma and Outcomes of Frozen Embryo Transfer

Sponsor
Wael Elbanna Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03945812
Collaborator
National Research Centre, Egypt (Other)
390
1
28.8
13.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The rationale behind this current study is to assess the impact of using PRP versus GCSF on the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer in term of clinical pregnancy rates.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
  • Other: Platelet Rich Plasma Arm
  • Other: Saline

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION AND STUDY RATIONALE Despite the advancements in the treatment of infertility, repeated failure of implantation continues as a challenging difficulty.

Embryo implantation is affected by many factors. Many efforts were made to improve the implantation rate by different methods blastocyst transfer, assisted hatching, preimplantation genetic screening, hysteroscopy, removal of hydrosalpinges and endometrial scratch. Furthermore, infertility specialists suggested some empirical methods like the infusion in the uterine cavity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients with thin endometrium which has been shown to be effective in improving the pregnancy rate.

Another factor is granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) which has receptors in endometrial cells and may have a role in implantation. The use of G-CSF in assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been tried by many research studies either via intrauterine or systemic administration.

There is only one study compared the impact of PRP and GCSF administration on the pregnancy rate and on the endometrial thickness with a small sample size.

The rationale behind this current study is to assess the impact of using PRP versus GCSF on the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer in term of clinical pregnancy rates.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Primary:

The primary objective of the study is to compare the clinical pregnancy rate determined by presence of fetal heart beat in transvaginal ultrasound after embryo transfer in all groups.

Secondary:
To compare the following in the three study arms:
  • Chemical pregnancy determined by positive serum β-HCG, 2 weeks after embryo transfer.

  • Clinical pregnancy rate adjusted by the endometrial thickness (thin versus normal) in all groups.

  • The midluteal endometrial thickness in all groups (histopathology & TVUS).

  • The number of women who had thin endometrium and reaches endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm after using G-CSF or PRP.

  • Implantation rate

  • Miscarriage rate

  • Live-birth rate

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
390 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
The Impact of Using Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Versus Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) on the Outcomes of Frozen Embryo Transfer; Randomized Controlled Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 15, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 15, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 8, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Arm

Women in this group will receive G-CSF with conventional hormonal therapy: Estradiol valerate 6mg/day from day 2 of menstrual cycle Vaginal sildenafil citrate 25mg / 6 hours Then frozen embryo transfer cycle will be performed.

Drug: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
Filgrastim, Amgen, California, USA 300 mg/1.0 mL
Other Names:
  • Filgrastim
  • Platelet Rich Plasma Arm

    Women in this group will receive PRP with conventional hormonal therapy: Estradiol valerate 6mg/day from day 2 of menstrual cycle Vaginal sildenafil citrate 25mg / 6 hours Then frozen embryo transfer cycle will be performed.

    Other: Platelet Rich Plasma Arm
    Platelet Rich Plasma Arm

    Saline

    Women in this group will receive saline with conventional hormonal therapy: Estradiol valerate 6mg/day from day 2 of menstrual cycle Vaginal sildenafil citrate 25mg / 6 hours Then frozen embryo transfer cycle will be performed.

    Other: Saline
    Saline 9%
    Other Names:
  • Saline 9%
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The clinical pregnancy rate [Up to 2 weeks]

      The clinical pregnancy rate

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Chemical pregnancy rate [Up to 2 weeks]

      Chemical pregnancy rate

    2. endometrial thickness [Up to 2 weeks]

      endometrial thickness in all groups (histopathology & TVUS)

    3. Implantation rate [Up to 2 weeks]

      Implantation rate

    4. Miscarriage rate [With second trimester]

      Miscarriage rate

    5. Live-birth rate [1 year]

      Live-birth rate

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    20 Years to 40 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • All women aged 20-40 years

    • non-smoker

    • BMI < 30

    • Normal endometrial cavity confirmed by hysteroscopy

    • Visiting the center for IVF by frozen embryo transfer during the period of the study

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History of anti-phospholipid syndrome confirmed by serological tests.

    • History of any hematological and immunological disorders

    • History of chromosomal or genetic abnormalities in the patient or in the family

    • Any uterine abnormalities (congenital or acquired)

    • Previous uterine surgeries except caesarean section

    • Hypersensitivity to G-CSF

    • Uncontrolled systemic disease

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Wael El-Banna Clinic Maadi Cairo Egypt

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Wael Elbanna Clinic
    • National Research Centre, Egypt

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Wael SS Elbanna, Consultant, Wael Elbanna Clinic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Wael Elbanna Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03945812
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • INDV-0909012
    First Posted:
    May 10, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 30, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Wael Elbanna Clinic
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 30, 2021